Premature deaths, accidental bequests, and fairness*

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Scandinavian Journal of Economics Pub Date : 2022-02-04 DOI:10.1111/sjoe.12478
Marc Fleurbaey, Marie-Louise Leroux, Pierre Pestieau, Gregory Ponthiere, Stephane Zuber
{"title":"Premature deaths, accidental bequests, and fairness*","authors":"Marc Fleurbaey, Marie-Louise Leroux, Pierre Pestieau, Gregory Ponthiere, Stephane Zuber","doi":"10.1111/sjoe.12478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there is little agreement regarding the taxation of bequests in general, there is a widely held view that accidental bequests should be subjected to a confiscatory tax. We re-examine the optimal taxation of accidental bequests by introducing a concern for compensating individuals for a premature death. Assuming that individuals care about what they leave to their children, we show that, whereas the 100 percent tax view holds under the utilitarian criterion, the <i>ex post</i> egalitarian criterion (giving priority to the worst-off <i>ex post</i>) implies subsidizing accidental bequests so as to compensate the short-lived. In a second-best setting, compensating the short-lived justifies taxing total bequests at a rate increasing with the age of the deceased. Finally, when the model is extended to an intergenerational setting, accidental bequests can no longer be used as a redistributive tool, so that <i>ex post</i> egalitarianism rejoins the 100 percent tax view.","PeriodicalId":47929,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Economics","volume":"45 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While there is little agreement regarding the taxation of bequests in general, there is a widely held view that accidental bequests should be subjected to a confiscatory tax. We re-examine the optimal taxation of accidental bequests by introducing a concern for compensating individuals for a premature death. Assuming that individuals care about what they leave to their children, we show that, whereas the 100 percent tax view holds under the utilitarian criterion, the ex post egalitarian criterion (giving priority to the worst-off ex post) implies subsidizing accidental bequests so as to compensate the short-lived. In a second-best setting, compensating the short-lived justifies taxing total bequests at a rate increasing with the age of the deceased. Finally, when the model is extended to an intergenerational setting, accidental bequests can no longer be used as a redistributive tool, so that ex post egalitarianism rejoins the 100 percent tax view.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过早死亡、意外遗赠和公平*
一般来说,关于遗赠的征税问题几乎没有一致意见,但人们普遍认为,意外遗赠应该征收没收税。我们通过引入对个人过早死亡的补偿来重新审视意外遗赠的最佳税收。假设个人关心他们留给孩子的东西,我们表明,在功利主义标准下,100%的税收观点成立,而事后平等主义标准(优先考虑事后最穷的人)意味着补贴意外遗赠,以补偿短命者。在次佳的情况下,补偿短命者证明了对遗赠总额征税的合理性,其税率随着死者年龄的增长而增加。最后,当该模型扩展到代际环境时,意外遗赠不能再用作再分配工具,因此后平均主义重新加入100%税收的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Economics is one of the oldest and most distinguished economics journals in the world. It publishes research of the highest scientific quality from an international array of contributors in all areas of economics and related fields. The journal features: - Articles and empirical studies on economic theory and policy - Book reviews - Comprehensive surveys of the contributions to economics of the recipients of the Alfred Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics - A special issue each year on key topics in economics
期刊最新文献
Income tax evasion and third‐party reported consumption and wealth: implications for the optimal tax structure Optimal redistributive charity Does leadership promote a cleaner climate? Monopoly pricing with unknown demand The making and unmaking of opportunity: educational mobility in 20th‐century Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1