{"title":"Molecular phylogeny and comparative morphology reveal the species validity and systematic position of Lepidodesma (Bivalvia: Unionidae)","authors":"Ruiwen Wu, Lili Liu, Liping Zhang, Dandong Jin, Xiaoping Wu, Xiongjun Liu, Zhicai Xie, Zhengfei Li","doi":"10.1007/s13127-023-00627-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increasingly sophisticated molecular techniques and research tools have greatly advanced the understanding of species diversity and phylogenetic relationships in freshwater mussels. However, malacologists have been puzzled by the taxonomic position and species validity of certain species, particularly those described solely based on conchological characteristics. The genus <i>Lepidodesma</i> is one such group. Here, we integrate shell morphology, soft-body anatomy, and molecular phylogeny to delimit the species validity of <i>Lepidodesma aligera</i> (Heude in Conchyliologie Fluviatile de la Provoince de Nanking 3:17–24, 1877) and <i>Lepidodesma languilati</i> (Heude in Journal De Conchyliologie 22:112–118, 1874). Comparative morphology reveals that <i>L</i>. <i>aligera</i> can be distinguished from <i>L</i>. <i>languilati</i> by its higher post-dorsal wing covered with scattered nodules, as well as differences in the incurrent aperture, excurrent aperture, and gill. Additionally, the average genetic distance based on DNA barcodes (COI) between both species is 4.0%. Integrative taxonomy supports the distinct species of <i>L. aligera</i>, rather than synonymy for <i>L. languilati</i>. Mitochondrial phylogenomic analyses confirm four monophyletic groups (Ambleminae + (Gonideinae + (Unioninae + Parreysiinae))) within the family Unionidae. <i>L. aligera</i> and <i>L. languilati</i> have a well-supported sister-group relationship and form a basal clade splitting from the rest of Unioninae. Therefore, the genus <i>Lepidodesma</i> should be classified as Lepidodesmini in Unioninae. The molecular clock with fossil calibration indicates that <i>Lepidodesma</i> originated in the Early Cretaceous (~121.30 Mya, 95% HPD = 90.37–156.54 Mya) and diverged in the Middle Neogene (~12.94 Mya, 95% HPD = 6.72–22.13 Mya). This study firstly provides anatomical features and molecular data for <i>L. aligera</i> and demonstrates the species validity and the systematic position of <i>Lepidodesma</i> taxa, which enrich our understanding of this rare group and facilitate its management and conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54666,"journal":{"name":"Organisms Diversity & Evolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organisms Diversity & Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-023-00627-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Increasingly sophisticated molecular techniques and research tools have greatly advanced the understanding of species diversity and phylogenetic relationships in freshwater mussels. However, malacologists have been puzzled by the taxonomic position and species validity of certain species, particularly those described solely based on conchological characteristics. The genus Lepidodesma is one such group. Here, we integrate shell morphology, soft-body anatomy, and molecular phylogeny to delimit the species validity of Lepidodesma aligera (Heude in Conchyliologie Fluviatile de la Provoince de Nanking 3:17–24, 1877) and Lepidodesma languilati (Heude in Journal De Conchyliologie 22:112–118, 1874). Comparative morphology reveals that L. aligera can be distinguished from L. languilati by its higher post-dorsal wing covered with scattered nodules, as well as differences in the incurrent aperture, excurrent aperture, and gill. Additionally, the average genetic distance based on DNA barcodes (COI) between both species is 4.0%. Integrative taxonomy supports the distinct species of L. aligera, rather than synonymy for L. languilati. Mitochondrial phylogenomic analyses confirm four monophyletic groups (Ambleminae + (Gonideinae + (Unioninae + Parreysiinae))) within the family Unionidae. L. aligera and L. languilati have a well-supported sister-group relationship and form a basal clade splitting from the rest of Unioninae. Therefore, the genus Lepidodesma should be classified as Lepidodesmini in Unioninae. The molecular clock with fossil calibration indicates that Lepidodesma originated in the Early Cretaceous (~121.30 Mya, 95% HPD = 90.37–156.54 Mya) and diverged in the Middle Neogene (~12.94 Mya, 95% HPD = 6.72–22.13 Mya). This study firstly provides anatomical features and molecular data for L. aligera and demonstrates the species validity and the systematic position of Lepidodesma taxa, which enrich our understanding of this rare group and facilitate its management and conservation.
期刊介绍:
Organisms Diversity & Evolution (published by the Gesellschaft fuer Biologische Systematik, GfBS) is devoted to furthering our understanding of all aspects of organismal diversity and evolution. Papers addressing evolutionary aspects of the systematics, phylogenetics, morphology and development, taxonomy and biogeography of any group of eukaryotes, recent or fossil, are welcome. Priority is given to papers with a strong evolutionary and/or phylogenetic focus. Manuscripts presenting important methods or tools or addressing key theoretical, methodological, and philosophical principles related to the study of organismal diversity are also welcome. Species descriptions are welcome as parts of a manuscript of broader interest that strive to integrate such taxonomic information with the other areas of interest mentioned above.