Strong-separation Logic

IF 1.6 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems Pub Date : 2022-07-15 DOI:https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3498847
Jens Pagel, Florian Zuleger
{"title":"Strong-separation Logic","authors":"Jens Pagel, Florian Zuleger","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3498847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most automated verifiers for separation logic are based on the symbolic-heap fragment, which disallows both the magic-wand operator and the application of classical Boolean operators to spatial formulas. This is not surprising, as support for the magic wand quickly leads to undecidability, especially when combined with inductive predicates for reasoning about data structures. To circumvent these undecidability results, we propose assigning a more restrictive semantics to the separating conjunction. We argue that the resulting logic, strong-separation logic, can be used for symbolic execution and abductive reasoning just like “standard” separation logic, while remaining decidable even in the presence of both the magic wand and inductive predicates (we consider a list-segment predicate and a tree predicate)—a combination of features that leads to undecidability for the standard semantics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50939,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3498847","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most automated verifiers for separation logic are based on the symbolic-heap fragment, which disallows both the magic-wand operator and the application of classical Boolean operators to spatial formulas. This is not surprising, as support for the magic wand quickly leads to undecidability, especially when combined with inductive predicates for reasoning about data structures. To circumvent these undecidability results, we propose assigning a more restrictive semantics to the separating conjunction. We argue that the resulting logic, strong-separation logic, can be used for symbolic execution and abductive reasoning just like “standard” separation logic, while remaining decidable even in the presence of both the magic wand and inductive predicates (we consider a list-segment predicate and a tree predicate)—a combination of features that leads to undecidability for the standard semantics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严格分离的逻辑
大多数分离逻辑的自动验证器都基于符号堆片段,这既不允许魔术棒操作符,也不允许将经典布尔操作符应用于空间公式。这并不奇怪,因为对魔术棒的支持很快就会导致不可判定性,特别是当与归纳谓词结合使用用于对数据结构进行推理时。为了避免这些不可判定的结果,我们建议为分离连接赋予更严格的语义。我们认为,由此产生的逻辑,即强分离逻辑,可以像“标准”分离逻辑一样用于符号执行和溯因推理,同时即使在魔术棒和归纳谓词(我们考虑一个列表段谓词和一个树谓词)都存在的情况下仍然是可判定的——这是导致标准语义不可判定的特征组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) is the premier journal for reporting recent research advances in the areas of programming languages, and systems to assist the task of programming. Papers can be either theoretical or experimental in style, but in either case, they must contain innovative and novel content that advances the state of the art of programming languages and systems. We also invite strictly experimental papers that compare existing approaches, as well as tutorial and survey papers. The scope of TOPLAS includes, but is not limited to, the following subjects: language design for sequential and parallel programming programming language implementation programming language semantics compilers and interpreters runtime systems for program execution storage allocation and garbage collection languages and methods for writing program specifications languages and methods for secure and reliable programs testing and verification of programs
期刊最新文献
Proving Correctness of Parallel Implementations of Transition System Models CFLOBDDs: Context-Free-Language Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams Adversities in Abstract Interpretation: Accommodating Robustness by Abstract Interpretation: ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems: Vol 0, No ja Homeostasis: Design and Implementation of a Self-Stabilizing Compiler Locally Abstract, Globally Concrete Semantics of Concurrent Programming Languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1