Causation in International Crimes Cases: (Re)Concenptualizing the Causal Linkage

IF 0.9 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Criminal Law Forum Pub Date : 2021-02-27 DOI:10.1007/s10609-020-09410-0
Marjolein Cupido
{"title":"Causation in International Crimes Cases: (Re)Concenptualizing the Causal Linkage","authors":"Marjolein Cupido","doi":"10.1007/s10609-020-09410-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article evaluates and (re)conceptualizes the notion of causation in international criminal law by using insights from legal theory and domestic criminal law. The article draws a distinction between empirical and normative causality and shows that in international case law emphasis has thus far been on empirical causality, whilst the meaning normative causality remains rather undefined and elusive. This is unfortunate, since normative causality is particularly important in international crimes cases, where the empirical linkage with the crimes is often remote and therefore uncertain. In an attempt to outline was normative causality means in relation to international crimes, the article draws upon legal theory and domestic criminal law to identify several factors that can be used to establish normative causation, in particular taking into account the specific nature of international crimes (as system criminality that is committed by groups), and the remote involvement of accused in such crimes.</p>","PeriodicalId":43773,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Law Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-020-09410-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article evaluates and (re)conceptualizes the notion of causation in international criminal law by using insights from legal theory and domestic criminal law. The article draws a distinction between empirical and normative causality and shows that in international case law emphasis has thus far been on empirical causality, whilst the meaning normative causality remains rather undefined and elusive. This is unfortunate, since normative causality is particularly important in international crimes cases, where the empirical linkage with the crimes is often remote and therefore uncertain. In an attempt to outline was normative causality means in relation to international crimes, the article draws upon legal theory and domestic criminal law to identify several factors that can be used to establish normative causation, in particular taking into account the specific nature of international crimes (as system criminality that is committed by groups), and the remote involvement of accused in such crimes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际犯罪案件的因果关系:(再)因果关系的概念化
本文运用法学理论和国内刑法的见解,对国际刑法中的因果关系概念进行了评价和(重新)概念化。文章对经验因果关系和规范因果关系进行了区分,并表明在国际判例法中,迄今为止强调的是经验因果关系,而规范因果关系的含义仍然相当不明确和难以捉摸。这是不幸的,因为规范的因果关系在国际犯罪案件中特别重要,在这些案件中,与罪行的经验联系往往是遥远的,因此是不确定的。为了概述与国际犯罪有关的规范性因果关系手段,本文借鉴了法律理论和国内刑法,以确定可用于建立规范性因果关系的几个因素,特别是考虑到国际犯罪的具体性质(作为由团体实施的系统犯罪),以及被告远程参与此类犯罪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Criminal Law Forum
Criminal Law Forum Multiple-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Criminal Law Forum is a peer-review journal dedicated to the advancement of criminal law theory, practice, and reform throughout the world. Under the direction of an international editorial board, Criminal Law Forum serves the global community of criminal law scholars and practitioners through the publication of original contributions and the dissemination of noteworthy public documents. Criminal Law Forum is published pursuant to an agreement with the Society for the Reform of Criminal Law, based in Vancouver, British Columbia.
期刊最新文献
National Security Whistleblowing. Reflections on the Rationale for Exempting from Criminal Liability the Unauthorised Disclosure of Classified Information for the Purpose of Exposing State Wrongdoing Judging Gender: The Sentencing of South African Mothers Who Murder Their Children An integrated model for criminal responsibility in action: How Swedish criminal law operates without an insanity defence An Empirical Study of Publicly Appointed and Privately Retained Defense Lawyers in Plea Bargaining: The Chinese Experience The Four Faces of Intoxication in the Botswana Criminal Justice System: “Defence”, Extenuation, Mitigation, and Aggravation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1