A cultural perspective on the effects of comprehension and slogan meaning types on attitude toward the advertisement and brand

IF 2.7 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Marketing Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI:10.1108/jcm-07-2020-3951
Elmira Shahriari, Hamid Abbassi, Ivonne M. Torres, Miguel Ángel Zúñiga, Nourah Alfayez
{"title":"A cultural perspective on the effects of comprehension and slogan meaning types on attitude toward the advertisement and brand","authors":"Elmira Shahriari, Hamid Abbassi, Ivonne M. Torres, Miguel Ángel Zúñiga, Nourah Alfayez","doi":"10.1108/jcm-07-2020-3951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent to which cultural differences and slogan meaning type affect the role of comprehension in attitude toward the ad (A<sub>ad</sub>) and attitude toward the brand (A<sub>brand</sub>) formation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>In an online experiment, a total of 256 adult participants from the USA (ranged in age from 19 to 26 years old) and 184 participants from France (ranged in age from 18 to 28) were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions (slogan: single meaning vs polysemous) in a between-subjects experimental design. After getting exposed to the ad, participants responded to questions related to their A<sub>ad</sub>, A<sub>brand</sub>, comprehension, uncertainty avoidance and demographics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Results from this research demonstrate the moderating effect of uncertainty avoidance and slogan type (single meaning vs polysemous) on the relationship between comprehension and A<sub>ad</sub>. The authors show that for polysemous (and not single meaning) slogans, comprehension results in more favorable A<sub>ad</sub> for low uncertainty avoidance individuals than for high uncertainty avoidance individuals. In addition, the authors demonstrate the mediating effect of A<sub>ad</sub> in the relationship between comprehension and A<sub>brand</sub>.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The authors used nationality as a proxy for culture. Future research should include other cultural dimensions in the development of conceptual models and analysis of data. Another limitation is that the authors used a college student sample for this research. A more representative sample should be used in future research to examine cultural differences in interpreting adverting messages. One other limitation concerns the measurement tool the authors used to measure objective versus subjective comprehension in this research. While the theoretical foundations of the two modes of comprehension are clear and robust, improved measurement tools can enhance the validity and reliability of future research. Finally, the authors suggest that future research examine the effect of such variables as figure-ground contrast, figure attractiveness, stimulus repetition, prototypicality, symmetry and semantic or visual priming that may impact the processing of brand slogans.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study argues that the processing of brand slogans in advertising is impacted by culture. Individuals from different cultures perceive and comprehend brand slogans differently. This study contributes to the research stream that examines the influence of cultural dimensions on the effectiveness of advertising by focusing more precisely on the impact of uncertainty avoidance (one of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions). In the case of single meaning slogans, advertisers might diminish the use of objective comprehension advertising strategies to influence both individuals with high and low uncertainty avoidance. In the case of polysemous slogans, advertisers should consider that consumers with high uncertainty avoidance (vs low uncertainty avoidance) are impacted more by subjective comprehension (vs objective comprehension) when forming A<sub>ad</sub> and A<sub>brand</sub>.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research contributes meaningfully to the marketing literature by examining previous work on ad slogan processing through subjective vs objective comprehension and extending the analysis by incorporating culture as an important factor.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":35923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-07-2020-3951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent to which cultural differences and slogan meaning type affect the role of comprehension in attitude toward the ad (Aad) and attitude toward the brand (Abrand) formation.

Design/methodology/approach

In an online experiment, a total of 256 adult participants from the USA (ranged in age from 19 to 26 years old) and 184 participants from France (ranged in age from 18 to 28) were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions (slogan: single meaning vs polysemous) in a between-subjects experimental design. After getting exposed to the ad, participants responded to questions related to their Aad, Abrand, comprehension, uncertainty avoidance and demographics.

Findings

Results from this research demonstrate the moderating effect of uncertainty avoidance and slogan type (single meaning vs polysemous) on the relationship between comprehension and Aad. The authors show that for polysemous (and not single meaning) slogans, comprehension results in more favorable Aad for low uncertainty avoidance individuals than for high uncertainty avoidance individuals. In addition, the authors demonstrate the mediating effect of Aad in the relationship between comprehension and Abrand.

Research limitations/implications

The authors used nationality as a proxy for culture. Future research should include other cultural dimensions in the development of conceptual models and analysis of data. Another limitation is that the authors used a college student sample for this research. A more representative sample should be used in future research to examine cultural differences in interpreting adverting messages. One other limitation concerns the measurement tool the authors used to measure objective versus subjective comprehension in this research. While the theoretical foundations of the two modes of comprehension are clear and robust, improved measurement tools can enhance the validity and reliability of future research. Finally, the authors suggest that future research examine the effect of such variables as figure-ground contrast, figure attractiveness, stimulus repetition, prototypicality, symmetry and semantic or visual priming that may impact the processing of brand slogans.

Practical implications

This study argues that the processing of brand slogans in advertising is impacted by culture. Individuals from different cultures perceive and comprehend brand slogans differently. This study contributes to the research stream that examines the influence of cultural dimensions on the effectiveness of advertising by focusing more precisely on the impact of uncertainty avoidance (one of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions). In the case of single meaning slogans, advertisers might diminish the use of objective comprehension advertising strategies to influence both individuals with high and low uncertainty avoidance. In the case of polysemous slogans, advertisers should consider that consumers with high uncertainty avoidance (vs low uncertainty avoidance) are impacted more by subjective comprehension (vs objective comprehension) when forming Aad and Abrand.

Originality/value

This research contributes meaningfully to the marketing literature by examining previous work on ad slogan processing through subjective vs objective comprehension and extending the analysis by incorporating culture as an important factor.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从文化角度看理解和广告语意义类型对广告和品牌态度的影响
本文的目的是考察文化差异和广告语意义类型对理解在广告态度(Aad)和品牌态度(Abrand)形成中的作用的影响程度。设计/方法/方法在一项在线实验中,共有256名来自美国的成年参与者(年龄从19岁到26岁不等)和184名来自法国的参与者(年龄从18岁到28岁不等)被随机分配到两种条件中的一种(口号:单一意义vs多义词)。在接触到广告后,参与者回答了与他们的广告、品牌、理解、不确定性规避和人口统计相关的问题。研究结果表明,不确定性回避和广告语类型(单义与多义)对广告语理解与广告投放的关系有调节作用。作者表明,对于多义词(而不是单一意思)口号,低不确定性回避个体的理解结果比高不确定性回避个体更有利。此外,作者还论证了ad在理解与Abrand之间的中介作用。研究局限/启示作者用国籍来代替文化。未来的研究应在概念模型的发展和数据分析中包括其他文化层面。另一个限制是,作者在这项研究中使用了一个大学生样本。在未来的研究中,应该使用更具代表性的样本来检验解读广告信息的文化差异。另一个限制涉及作者在本研究中用于测量客观理解与主观理解的测量工具。虽然这两种理解模式的理论基础是明确和健全的,但改进的测量工具可以提高未来研究的效度和信度。最后,作者建议,未来的研究将检验诸如图底对比、图吸引力、刺激重复、原型性、对称性和语义或视觉启动等变量对品牌标语加工的影响。实践启示本研究认为广告中品牌口号的加工受到文化的影响。不同文化背景的人对品牌口号的感知和理解是不同的。本研究通过更精确地关注不确定性规避(Hofstede的文化维度之一)的影响,为研究文化维度对广告有效性的影响的研究流做出了贡献。在单一含义口号的情况下,广告商可能会减少使用客观理解广告策略来影响高不确定性规避和低不确定性规避的个体。在多义词广告语的情况下,广告主应该考虑到不确定性规避程度高的消费者(相对于不确定性规避程度低的消费者)在形成广告和品牌时更容易受到主观理解(相对于客观理解)的影响。原创性/价值本研究通过主观与客观的理解来审视以往关于广告语处理的研究,并将文化作为一个重要因素纳入分析范围,从而对营销文献做出了有意义的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Journal of Consumer Marketing Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: ■Consumer behaviour ■Customer policy and service ■Practical case studies to illustrate concepts ■The latest thinking and research in marketing planning ■The marketing of services worldwide
期刊最新文献
Generation Z’s intention to use digital fashion items in the Metaverse Conspicuous compensatory consumption: scale development and initial validation The adoption of smart services: do privacy concerns, trust in benevolence and usage experience matter? In smartness we trust: consumer experience, smart device personalization and privacy balance Examining process mechanism of celebrity attributes on brand advocacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1