How electronic word of mouth (eWOM) shapes consumer social media shopping

IF 2.7 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Marketing Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1108/jcm-01-2023-5817
Brittany Beck, Melanie Moore Koskie, William Locander
{"title":"How electronic word of mouth (eWOM) shapes consumer social media shopping","authors":"Brittany Beck, Melanie Moore Koskie, William Locander","doi":"10.1108/jcm-01-2023-5817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to contribute to the ongoing discussion of how consumers approach shopping directly via social media by explicating decisions related to trust on social media and how various types of electronic word of mouth (eWOM; ratings and reviews, recommendations and referrals and social media communities) contribute to these decisions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A total of 198 respondents with experience shopping directly via social media were instructed to select the platform on which they had the most shopping experience (Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest, etc.) to answer relevant survey questions. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used for analyzing the results.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Findings reveal that eWOM provided by strong ties (recommendations and referrals; social media communities) is superior to weak ties (ratings and reviews). Surprisingly, ratings and reviews do not significantly relate to trust in the retailer, suggesting that this information may be necessary but not sufficient for trusting retailers on social media.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research distinguishes trust decisions related to shopping on social media and clarifies how each type of eWOM uniquely influences trust in the retailer by using tie strength theory.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":35923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-01-2023-5817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to contribute to the ongoing discussion of how consumers approach shopping directly via social media by explicating decisions related to trust on social media and how various types of electronic word of mouth (eWOM; ratings and reviews, recommendations and referrals and social media communities) contribute to these decisions.

Design/methodology/approach

A total of 198 respondents with experience shopping directly via social media were instructed to select the platform on which they had the most shopping experience (Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest, etc.) to answer relevant survey questions. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used for analyzing the results.

Findings

Findings reveal that eWOM provided by strong ties (recommendations and referrals; social media communities) is superior to weak ties (ratings and reviews). Surprisingly, ratings and reviews do not significantly relate to trust in the retailer, suggesting that this information may be necessary but not sufficient for trusting retailers on social media.

Originality/value

This research distinguishes trust decisions related to shopping on social media and clarifies how each type of eWOM uniquely influences trust in the retailer by using tie strength theory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子口碑如何影响消费者的社交媒体购物
本研究旨在通过解释与社交媒体信任相关的决策,以及各种类型的电子口碑(eWOM;评级和评论、推荐和推荐(以及社交媒体社区)有助于做出这些决定。设计/方法/方法共198名有直接通过社交媒体购物经验的受访者被要求选择他们最具购物经验的平台(Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest等)来回答相关的调查问题。采用结构方程模型(SEM)对结果进行分析。研究结果表明,eom是由强关系(推荐和推荐;社交媒体社区)优于弱关系(评分和评论)。令人惊讶的是,评级和评论与对零售商的信任没有显著关系,这表明这些信息可能是必要的,但不足以信任社交媒体上的零售商。原创性/价值本研究区分了与社交媒体购物相关的信任决策,并利用联系强度理论阐明了每种类型的eom如何独特地影响对零售商的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Journal of Consumer Marketing Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: ■Consumer behaviour ■Customer policy and service ■Practical case studies to illustrate concepts ■The latest thinking and research in marketing planning ■The marketing of services worldwide
期刊最新文献
Generation Z’s intention to use digital fashion items in the Metaverse Conspicuous compensatory consumption: scale development and initial validation The adoption of smart services: do privacy concerns, trust in benevolence and usage experience matter? In smartness we trust: consumer experience, smart device personalization and privacy balance Examining process mechanism of celebrity attributes on brand advocacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1