Differentiation of hemp from marijuana using a qualitative decision-point assay

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Forensic Chemistry Pub Date : 2023-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.forc.2023.100541
Ya-Chih Cheng, Sarah Kerrigan
{"title":"Differentiation of hemp from marijuana using a qualitative decision-point assay","authors":"Ya-Chih Cheng,&nbsp;Sarah Kerrigan","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2023.100541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Marijuana and hemp are different cultivars of the species, <em>Cannabis sativa</em>. Trichomes within these genetically distinct forms result in different chemical constituents within the plant matrix. While drug-type cannabis yields higher total Δ9-THC concentrations, industrial or consumer-based hemp products are typically rich in cannabidiol or CBD-rich. Regulatory changes following the passage of agricultural legislation in the United States defines hemp as <em>C. sativa</em> containing no more than 0.3 % Δ9-THC on a dry weight basis. This threshold, which effectively differentiates legal hemp from illegal marijuana, presents a challenge to operational forensic laboratories. In this report we describe a decision-point assay to differentiate hemp from marijuana using a 1 % threshold. Methanolic extracts of <em>C. sativa</em> were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) using a deuterated analog (Δ9-THC-D3). Synchronous selected ion monitoring (SIM) and full scan acquisition was used for targeted analysis of Δ9-THC at the decision-point. Assay performance was evaluated in terms of limit of detection, linearity, carryover, selectivity, precision, accuracy and extract stability. Two analytical approaches are presented. Extraction efficiencies of Δ9-THC from plant matrix were 80–92 %, and decarboxylation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) was 67 %. Interferences arising from the cyclization of CBD to produce Δ9-THC in the GC inlet were addressed using concentrations in excess of those typically encountered in plant samples. Accuracy was established across the specified range of the assay using known reference materials containing 0.12 to 10.1 % Δ9-THC. No false positive or negative results were identified (n = 140) using both analytical approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170923000772/pdfft?md5=b6eac24f63188fe8d2afa17e1b8bb2f7&pid=1-s2.0-S2468170923000772-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170923000772","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Marijuana and hemp are different cultivars of the species, Cannabis sativa. Trichomes within these genetically distinct forms result in different chemical constituents within the plant matrix. While drug-type cannabis yields higher total Δ9-THC concentrations, industrial or consumer-based hemp products are typically rich in cannabidiol or CBD-rich. Regulatory changes following the passage of agricultural legislation in the United States defines hemp as C. sativa containing no more than 0.3 % Δ9-THC on a dry weight basis. This threshold, which effectively differentiates legal hemp from illegal marijuana, presents a challenge to operational forensic laboratories. In this report we describe a decision-point assay to differentiate hemp from marijuana using a 1 % threshold. Methanolic extracts of C. sativa were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) using a deuterated analog (Δ9-THC-D3). Synchronous selected ion monitoring (SIM) and full scan acquisition was used for targeted analysis of Δ9-THC at the decision-point. Assay performance was evaluated in terms of limit of detection, linearity, carryover, selectivity, precision, accuracy and extract stability. Two analytical approaches are presented. Extraction efficiencies of Δ9-THC from plant matrix were 80–92 %, and decarboxylation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) was 67 %. Interferences arising from the cyclization of CBD to produce Δ9-THC in the GC inlet were addressed using concentrations in excess of those typically encountered in plant samples. Accuracy was established across the specified range of the assay using known reference materials containing 0.12 to 10.1 % Δ9-THC. No false positive or negative results were identified (n = 140) using both analytical approaches.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用定性判定点法鉴别大麻和大麻
大麻和大麻是大麻这一物种的不同品种。这些遗传上不同形式的毛状体在植物基质中产生不同的化学成分。虽然药物类大麻产生更高的Δ9-THC总浓度,但工业或消费大麻产品通常富含大麻二酚或cbd。美国农业立法通过后的监管变化将大麻定义为C. sativa,其干重含量不超过0.3% Δ9-THC。这个阈值,有效地区分合法大麻和非法大麻,提出了一个挑战,业务法医实验室。在本报告中,我们描述了一个决策点分析,以区分大麻大麻使用1%的阈值。采用氘化类似物(Δ9-THC-D3)气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS)对芥蓝甲醇提取物进行分析。采用同步选择离子监测(SIM)和全扫描采集对决策点Δ9-THC进行针对性分析。从检出限、线性、结转、选择性、精密度、准确度和提取稳定性等方面评价分析性能。提出了两种分析方法。从植物基质中提取Δ9-THC的效率为80-92%,Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic酸(THCA)脱羧率为67%。在GC进口中产生Δ9-THC的CBD环化产生的干扰使用超过植物样品中通常遇到的浓度来解决。使用含有0.12至10.1% Δ9-THC的已知标准物质,在测定的指定范围内建立了准确性。两种分析方法均未发现假阳性或阴性结果(n=140)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Chemistry
Forensic Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
14.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.
期刊最新文献
Development and evaluation of a nontargeted electrochemical surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (EC-SERS) screening method applied to forensic seized drug casework samples Observation of chromatographic differences by non-specialist viewers for one-dimensional gas chromatography and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography output Assessment of two benzylation strategies for the analysis of nerve-agent derived ethyl- and pinacolyl methyl phosphonic acids in sandy loam soil by GC–MS Portable near-infrared detection to replace color tests in an analytical scheme for forensic drug identification Halogen-bond mediated charge transfer for visual competitive colorimetric detection of fentanyl
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1