Rethinking liability rules for online hosting platforms

Miriam C Buiten,Alexandre de Streel,and Martin Peitz
{"title":"Rethinking liability rules for online hosting platforms","authors":"Miriam C Buiten,Alexandre de Streel,and Martin Peitz","doi":"10.1093/ijlit/eaaa012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract With the growing economic and societal importance of online platforms, the question of their liability for illegal content or products they host becomes more important. Based on an analysis of platforms’ incentives, we address the appropriate liability rule for hosting service providers and derive policy recommendations for an efficient liability regime in the European Union. Online hosting platforms may take monitoring efforts on their own initiative that are suboptimal due to the presence of externalities and asymmetric information problems, warranting some form of liability rules. However, for more fundamental reasons of free speech and preventing censorship, policy makers may want to be cautious in entrusting—and burdening—private parties which such an extensive ‘policing’ role. Additionally, higher monitoring requirements may disproportionally burden small entrants. As we argue, since several actors participate to the diffusion of illegal material online, the responsibility of a safe Internet should be shared among all these actors. Concrete regulatory improvements may encourage online hosting platforms to do their part in monitoring proactively and diligently.","PeriodicalId":44278,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Information Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"139-166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaa012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract With the growing economic and societal importance of online platforms, the question of their liability for illegal content or products they host becomes more important. Based on an analysis of platforms’ incentives, we address the appropriate liability rule for hosting service providers and derive policy recommendations for an efficient liability regime in the European Union. Online hosting platforms may take monitoring efforts on their own initiative that are suboptimal due to the presence of externalities and asymmetric information problems, warranting some form of liability rules. However, for more fundamental reasons of free speech and preventing censorship, policy makers may want to be cautious in entrusting—and burdening—private parties which such an extensive ‘policing’ role. Additionally, higher monitoring requirements may disproportionally burden small entrants. As we argue, since several actors participate to the diffusion of illegal material online, the responsibility of a safe Internet should be shared among all these actors. Concrete regulatory improvements may encourage online hosting platforms to do their part in monitoring proactively and diligently.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新思考网络托管平台的责任规则
随着网络平台在经济和社会上的重要性日益提高,其对其托管的非法内容或产品的责任问题变得更加重要。基于对平台激励机制的分析,我们为托管服务提供商制定了适当的责任规则,并为欧盟有效的责任制度提出了政策建议。由于外部性和信息不对称问题的存在,在线托管平台可能会主动采取监测工作,这是次优的,需要某种形式的责任规则。然而,出于言论自由和防止审查的更根本的原因,政策制定者可能希望在委托和负担私人团体发挥如此广泛的“监管”作用时保持谨慎。此外,更高的监测要求可能会给小型进入者带来不成比例的负担。正如我们所认为的,既然有几个行为者参与了网上非法材料的传播,那么安全互联网的责任应该由所有这些行为者共同承担。具体的监管改进可能会鼓励网络托管平台主动、勤奋地履行监管职责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Information Technology provides cutting-edge and comprehensive analysis of Information Technology, Communications and Cyberspace law as well as the issues arising from applying Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) to legal practice. International in scope, this journal has become essential for legal and computing professionals and legal scholars of the law related to IT.
期刊最新文献
Digital identity: an approach to its nature, concept, and functionalities Can there be responsible AI without AI liability? Incentivizing generative AI safety through ex-post tort liability under the EU AI liability directive Quantum-safe global encryption policy Video-sharing-platforms and Brussels Ia regulation: navigating contractual jurisdictional challenges Artificial intelligence co-regulation? The role of standards in the EU AI Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1