The packet number space debate in multipath QUIC

IF 2.2 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3561954.3561956
Quentin De Coninck
{"title":"The packet number space debate in multipath QUIC","authors":"Quentin De Coninck","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3561954.3561956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With a standardization process that attracted much interest, QUIC can been seen as the next general-purpose transport protocol. Still, it does not provide true multipath support yet, missing some use cases that Multipath TCP addresses. To fill that gap, the IETF recently adopted a Multipath proposal merging several proposed designs. While it focuses on its core components, there still remains one major design issue: the amount of packet number spaces that should be used. This paper provides experimental results with two different Multipath QUIC implementations based on NS3 simulations to understand the impact of using one packet number space per path or a single packet number space for the whole connection. Our results show that using one packet number space per path makes Multipath QUIC more resilient to the receiver's heuristics to acknowledge packets and detect duplicates.</p>","PeriodicalId":50646,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3561954.3561956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With a standardization process that attracted much interest, QUIC can been seen as the next general-purpose transport protocol. Still, it does not provide true multipath support yet, missing some use cases that Multipath TCP addresses. To fill that gap, the IETF recently adopted a Multipath proposal merging several proposed designs. While it focuses on its core components, there still remains one major design issue: the amount of packet number spaces that should be used. This paper provides experimental results with two different Multipath QUIC implementations based on NS3 simulations to understand the impact of using one packet number space per path or a single packet number space for the whole connection. Our results show that using one packet number space per path makes Multipath QUIC more resilient to the receiver's heuristics to acknowledge packets and detect duplicates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多路径QUIC中包数空间的争论
由于标准化过程引起了极大的兴趣,QUIC可以被视为下一个通用传输协议。但是,它还没有提供真正的多路径支持,缺少multipath TCP地址的一些用例。为了填补这一空白,IETF最近采用了一项合并了几种提议设计的多路径提案。虽然它专注于其核心组件,但仍然存在一个主要的设计问题:应该使用的数据包数空间的数量。本文提供了基于NS3仿真的两种不同的多路径QUIC实现的实验结果,以了解每条路径使用一个包数空间或整个连接使用单个包数空间的影响。我们的研究结果表明,每条路径使用一个数据包数空间使多路径QUIC对接收方的启发式识别数据包和检测重复更有弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review
ACM Sigcomm Computer Communication Review 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Communication Review (CCR) is an online publication of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM) and publishes articles on topics within the SIG''s field of interest. Technical papers accepted to CCR typically report on practical advances or the practical applications of theoretical advances. CCR serves as a forum for interesting and novel ideas at an early stage in their development. The focus is on timely dissemination of new ideas that may help trigger additional investigations. While the innovation and timeliness are the major criteria for its acceptance, technical robustness and readability will also be considered in the review process. We particularly encourage papers with early evaluation or feasibility studies.
期刊最新文献
The I/O Driven Server: From SmartNICs to Data Movement Controllers On Integrating eBPF into Pluginized Protocols Can We Save the Public Internet? The October 2023 Issue Recent Trends on Privacy-Preserving Technologies under Standardization at the IETF
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1