Association Between Lung Immune Prognostic Index and Durvalumab Consolidation Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical lung cancer Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2023.11.007
Mariona Riudavets , Edouard Auclin , Miguel Mosteiro , Naomi Dempsey , Margarita Majem , Arsela Prelaj , Rafael López-Castro , Joaquim Bosch-Barrera , Sara Pilotto , Elena Escalera , Marco Tagliamento , Joaquin Mosquera , Gérard Zalcman , Frank Aboubakar Nana , Santiago Ponce , Víctor Albarrán-Artahona , Alessandro Dal Maso , Martina Spotti , Xabier Mielgo , Elodie Mussat , David Planchard
{"title":"Association Between Lung Immune Prognostic Index and Durvalumab Consolidation Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer","authors":"Mariona Riudavets ,&nbsp;Edouard Auclin ,&nbsp;Miguel Mosteiro ,&nbsp;Naomi Dempsey ,&nbsp;Margarita Majem ,&nbsp;Arsela Prelaj ,&nbsp;Rafael López-Castro ,&nbsp;Joaquim Bosch-Barrera ,&nbsp;Sara Pilotto ,&nbsp;Elena Escalera ,&nbsp;Marco Tagliamento ,&nbsp;Joaquin Mosquera ,&nbsp;Gérard Zalcman ,&nbsp;Frank Aboubakar Nana ,&nbsp;Santiago Ponce ,&nbsp;Víctor Albarrán-Artahona ,&nbsp;Alessandro Dal Maso ,&nbsp;Martina Spotti ,&nbsp;Xabier Mielgo ,&nbsp;Elodie Mussat ,&nbsp;David Planchard","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2023.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The LIPI, based on pretreatment derived neutrophils/[leukocytes-neutrophils] ratio (dNLR) and LDH, is associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) outcomes in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess baseline LIPI correlation with durvalumab consolidation outcomes in the locally advanced setting.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>Multicentre retrospective study (330 patients) with stage III unresectable NSCLC treated with durvalumab after chemo-radiotherapy between April 2015 and December 2020; 65 patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy only. Baseline LIPI characterized 3 groups: good (dNLR≤3+LDH≤ULN), intermediate (dNLR&gt;3/LDH&gt;ULN) and poor (dNLR&gt;3+LDH&gt;ULN). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the durvalumab cohort, median age was 67 years, 95% smokers, 98% with a performance status of 0-1; 60% had nonsquamous histology and 16% a PD-L1 expression &lt;1%. Radiotherapy was delivered concurrently in 81%. LIPI was evaluable in 216 patients: 66% good, 31% intermediate, 3% poor.</p><p>LIPI significantly correlated with median OS (median follow-up: 19 months): 18.1 months vs. 47.0 months vs. not reached in poor, intermediate and good LIPI groups, respectively (<em>P</em> = .03). A trend between objective response rate and LIPI groups was observed: 0% vs. 41% vs. 45%, respectively (<em>P</em> = .05). The pooled intermediate/poor LIPI group was associated with shorter OS (HR 1.97; <em>P</em> = .03) and higher risk of progressive disease (OR 2.68; <em>P</em> = .047). Survivals and response were not influenced in the control cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Baseline LIPI correlated with outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with durvalumab consolidation, but not in those who only received chemo-radiotherapy, providing further evidence of its prognostic and potential predictive role of ICI benefit in NSCLC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730423002425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The LIPI, based on pretreatment derived neutrophils/[leukocytes-neutrophils] ratio (dNLR) and LDH, is associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) outcomes in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess baseline LIPI correlation with durvalumab consolidation outcomes in the locally advanced setting.

Material and Methods

Multicentre retrospective study (330 patients) with stage III unresectable NSCLC treated with durvalumab after chemo-radiotherapy between April 2015 and December 2020; 65 patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy only. Baseline LIPI characterized 3 groups: good (dNLR≤3+LDH≤ULN), intermediate (dNLR>3/LDH>ULN) and poor (dNLR>3+LDH>ULN). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Results

In the durvalumab cohort, median age was 67 years, 95% smokers, 98% with a performance status of 0-1; 60% had nonsquamous histology and 16% a PD-L1 expression <1%. Radiotherapy was delivered concurrently in 81%. LIPI was evaluable in 216 patients: 66% good, 31% intermediate, 3% poor.

LIPI significantly correlated with median OS (median follow-up: 19 months): 18.1 months vs. 47.0 months vs. not reached in poor, intermediate and good LIPI groups, respectively (P = .03). A trend between objective response rate and LIPI groups was observed: 0% vs. 41% vs. 45%, respectively (P = .05). The pooled intermediate/poor LIPI group was associated with shorter OS (HR 1.97; P = .03) and higher risk of progressive disease (OR 2.68; P = .047). Survivals and response were not influenced in the control cohort.

Conclusion

Baseline LIPI correlated with outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with durvalumab consolidation, but not in those who only received chemo-radiotherapy, providing further evidence of its prognostic and potential predictive role of ICI benefit in NSCLC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者肺免疫预后指数与durvalumab巩固结果的关系
基于治疗前衍生中性粒细胞/[白细胞-中性粒细胞]比率(dNLR)和LDH的LIPI与晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)结果相关。我们的目的是评估基线LIPI与局部晚期杜伐单抗巩固结果的相关性。材料与方法2015年4月- 2020年12月多中心回顾性研究(330例)化疗后接受杜伐单抗治疗的III期不可切除NSCLC患者;65例患者仅接受放化疗。基线LIPI分为3组:良好(dNLR≤3+LDH≤ULN)、中等(dNLR>3/LDH>ULN)和差(dNLR>3+LDH>ULN)。主要终点为总生存期(OS)。结果在durvalumab队列中,中位年龄为67岁,95%为吸烟者,98%的表现状态为0-1;60%为非鳞状组织,16%为PD-L1表达;放疗同时进行的占81%。216例患者的LIPI可评估:66%良好,31%中等,3%差。LIPI与中位OS显著相关(中位随访时间:19个月),差、中、好的LIPI组分别为:18.1 vs. 47.0 vs.未达到(P=0.03)。客观有效率与LIPI组比较,分别为0%、41%、45% (P=0.05)。合并中/差LIPI组与较短的OS相关(HR 1.97;P=0.03)和更高的疾病进展风险(OR 2.68;P = 0.047)。在对照组中,生存率和反应不受影响。结论基线LIPI与局部晚期NSCLC患者接受durvalumab巩固治疗的预后相关,但与仅接受化疗放疗的患者无关,进一步证明了其在非小细胞肺癌中ICI获益的预后和潜在预测作用。化疗放疗加免疫治疗是无法切除的III期非小细胞肺癌的标准治疗方法。LIPI评分可以提高对治疗结果的预测。我们对330名患者进行了回顾性研究。我们发现LIPI评分与生存率之间存在相关性,为其作为这些患者预后和预测工具的作用提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
A Phase I Open-Label Study of Cediranib Plus Etoposide and Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Identification and Treatment of Lung Cancer Oncogenic Drivers in a Diverse Safety Net Setting Understanding the Social Risk Factors That Avert Equitable Lung Cancer Care Response to Editor: Commentary on “Influence of Tumor Cavitation on Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Anti-PD1 or PD-L1 Inhibitors in Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma” Letter to the Editor in Response to “Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening in a Centralized Academic Program”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1