Protecting Privacy in Digital Records: The Potential of Privacy Enhancing Technologies

IF 2.1 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1145/3633477
Victoria L. Lemieux, John Werner
{"title":"Protecting Privacy in Digital Records: The Potential of Privacy Enhancing Technologies","authors":"Victoria L. Lemieux, John Werner","doi":"10.1145/3633477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With increased concerns about data protection and privacy over the past several years, and concomitant introduction of regulations restricting access to personally information (PI), archivists in many jurisdictions now must undertake ‘sensitivity reviews’ of archival documents to determine if they can make those documents accessible to researchers. Such reviews are onerous, given increasing volume of records, and complex, due to how difficult it can be for archivists to identify whether records contain personal information (PI) under the provisions of various laws. Despite research into the application of tools and techniques to automate sensitivity reviews, effective solutions remain elusive. Not yet explored as a solution to the challenge of enabling access to archival holdings subject to privacy restrictions is the application of privacy enhancing technologies (PETs) - a class of emerging technologies that rest on the assumption that a body of documents is confidential or private and must remain so. While seemingly being counter-intuitive to apply PETs to making archives more accessible, we argue that PETs could provide an opportunity to protect PI in archival holdings whilst still enabling research on those holdings. In this paper, to lay a foundation for archival experimentation with use of PETs, we contribute an overview of these technologies based on a scoping review and discuss possible use cases and future research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54310,"journal":{"name":"ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3633477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With increased concerns about data protection and privacy over the past several years, and concomitant introduction of regulations restricting access to personally information (PI), archivists in many jurisdictions now must undertake ‘sensitivity reviews’ of archival documents to determine if they can make those documents accessible to researchers. Such reviews are onerous, given increasing volume of records, and complex, due to how difficult it can be for archivists to identify whether records contain personal information (PI) under the provisions of various laws. Despite research into the application of tools and techniques to automate sensitivity reviews, effective solutions remain elusive. Not yet explored as a solution to the challenge of enabling access to archival holdings subject to privacy restrictions is the application of privacy enhancing technologies (PETs) - a class of emerging technologies that rest on the assumption that a body of documents is confidential or private and must remain so. While seemingly being counter-intuitive to apply PETs to making archives more accessible, we argue that PETs could provide an opportunity to protect PI in archival holdings whilst still enabling research on those holdings. In this paper, to lay a foundation for archival experimentation with use of PETs, we contribute an overview of these technologies based on a scoping review and discuss possible use cases and future research directions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护数码纪录的私隐:加强私隐技术的潜力
随着过去几年对数据保护和隐私的关注增加,以及随之而来的限制个人信息访问(PI)的法规的引入,许多司法管辖区的档案保管员现在必须对档案文件进行“敏感性审查”,以确定他们是否可以让研究人员访问这些文件。由于档案数量不断增加,审查工作非常繁重,而且根据各种法律的规定,档案管理员很难确定档案中是否包含个人信息(PI),因此审查工作非常复杂。尽管对自动化敏感性审查的工具和技术的应用进行了研究,但有效的解决方案仍然难以捉摸。隐私增强技术(pet)的应用尚未被作为一种解决方案来探索,以使人们能够在隐私限制的情况下访问档案。这是一类新兴技术,它基于一组文件是机密或私人的假设,并且必须保持机密或私人。虽然将pet应用于使档案更容易获取似乎是违反直觉的,但我们认为pet可以提供一个机会来保护档案馆藏中的PI,同时仍然可以对这些馆藏进行研究。在本文中,为了为档案实验奠定基础,我们在范围回顾的基础上对这些技术进行了概述,并讨论了可能的用例和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) publishes papers of significant and lasting value in all areas relating to the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in support of Cultural Heritage. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that demonstrate innovative use of technology for the discovery, analysis, interpretation and presentation of cultural material, as well as manuscripts that illustrate applications in the Cultural Heritage sector that challenge the computational technologies and suggest new research opportunities in computer science.
期刊最新文献
Heritage Iconographic Content Structuring: from Automatic Linking to Visual Validation Digitising the Deep Past: Machine Learning for Rock Art Motif Classification in an Educational Citizen Science Application Interpretable Clusters for Representing Citizens’ Sense of Belonging through Interaction with Cultural Heritage Classification of Impressionist and Pointillist paintings based on their brushstrokes characteristics ZoAM GameBot: a Journey to the Lost Computational World in the Amazonia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1