Understanding generational differences for financial inclusion in Kenya

Lilian Korir, Dieu Hack-Polay
{"title":"Understanding generational differences for financial inclusion in Kenya","authors":"Lilian Korir, Dieu Hack-Polay","doi":"10.1108/ajems-09-2022-0391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p> The purpose of this paper is to estimate the effect the five different generations and the key financial inclusion indicators of gender, education and location (rural–urban) in exacerbating disparities in financial inclusion in Kenya. This paper considers whether the five generational cohort groups in Kenya differ on the financial inclusion determinants and behaviour as predicted by common generational stereotypes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p> The authors applied a multinomial logistic regression approach to nationally representative household survey data from Kenya to estimate the effect that key financial inclusion indicators have on belonging to one of the five generations: Z, Y, X, baby boomers and traditionalists.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p> The authors found significant links between all tested variables and financial inclusion. The authors found an access gap between Generations X and Y, with the latter being more prone to access and use financial services and products. These differences are compounded by gender and rurality. People in rural locations and women generally were found to have less access to financial services and products, thus causing significant exclusion of a large proportion of the population.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p> The research has important implications for governments, financial institutions and educational providers, notably on targeted policies and programmes that strategically aim to eliminate disparities and promote greater financial inclusion, denoting the value of such variables as generational differences and gender inclusivity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p> This paper deepens the understanding of differences that can divide generations on financial inclusion.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46031,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Economic and Management Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Economic and Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajems-09-2022-0391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to estimate the effect the five different generations and the key financial inclusion indicators of gender, education and location (rural–urban) in exacerbating disparities in financial inclusion in Kenya. This paper considers whether the five generational cohort groups in Kenya differ on the financial inclusion determinants and behaviour as predicted by common generational stereotypes.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors applied a multinomial logistic regression approach to nationally representative household survey data from Kenya to estimate the effect that key financial inclusion indicators have on belonging to one of the five generations: Z, Y, X, baby boomers and traditionalists.

Findings

The authors found significant links between all tested variables and financial inclusion. The authors found an access gap between Generations X and Y, with the latter being more prone to access and use financial services and products. These differences are compounded by gender and rurality. People in rural locations and women generally were found to have less access to financial services and products, thus causing significant exclusion of a large proportion of the population.

Practical implications

The research has important implications for governments, financial institutions and educational providers, notably on targeted policies and programmes that strategically aim to eliminate disparities and promote greater financial inclusion, denoting the value of such variables as generational differences and gender inclusivity.

Originality/value

This paper deepens the understanding of differences that can divide generations on financial inclusion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解肯尼亚金融包容性的代际差异
本文的目的是估计五代人以及性别、教育和地理位置(城乡)等关键普惠金融指标在加剧肯尼亚普惠金融差距方面的影响。本文考虑了肯尼亚的五代队列群体是否在金融包容性决定因素和行为上存在差异,正如共同的世代刻板印象所预测的那样。设计/方法/方法作者对肯尼亚具有全国代表性的家庭调查数据采用了多项逻辑回归方法,以估计关键金融包容性指标对属于五代人之一的影响:Z、Y、X、婴儿潮一代和传统主义者。作者发现,所有测试变量与金融包容性之间存在显著联系。两位作者发现,X世代和Y世代在获取金融服务和产品方面存在差距,后者更倾向于获取和使用金融服务和产品。这些差异因性别和农村而更加复杂。农村地区的人民和妇女一般获得金融服务和产品的机会较少,因此造成很大一部分人口被排除在外。该研究对政府、金融机构和教育提供者具有重要意义,特别是在有针对性的政策和计划方面,这些政策和计划的战略目标是消除差距和促进更大的金融包容性,这表明了代际差异和性别包容性等变量的价值。本文加深了对普惠金融代际差异的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: African Journal of Economic and Management Studies (AJEMS) advances both theoretical and empirical research, informs policies and practices, and improves understanding of how economic and business decisions shape the lives of Africans. AJEMS is a multidisciplinary journal and welcomes papers from all the major disciplines in economics, business and management studies.
期刊最新文献
Examining the relationship between inclusive growth and tax revenue mobilization: additional evidence from sub-Saharan African countries Tariff effects on industrial performance: symmetric and asymmetric evidence from Nigeria Assessing the extent of exchange rate risk pricing in equity markets: emerging versus developed economies Fiscal policy and poverty reduction in sub-Saharan Africa: is the relationship influenced by the business cycle? Ownership structure and financial distress: is the tale from Sub-Saharan Africa different?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1