Medicine against Suicide: Sustaining Solidarity with Those Diminished by Illness and Debility

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Christian Bioethics Pub Date : 2021-12-09 DOI:10.1093/cb/cbab010
Farr A Curlin, Christopher Tollefsen
{"title":"Medicine against Suicide: Sustaining Solidarity with Those Diminished by Illness and Debility","authors":"Farr A Curlin, Christopher Tollefsen","doi":"10.1093/cb/cbab010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The medical profession’s increasing acceptance of “physician aid-in-dying” indicates the ascendancy of what we call the provider-of-services model for medicine, in which medical “providers” offer services to help patients maximize their “well-being” according to the wishes of the patient. This model contrasts with and contradicts what we call the Way of Medicine, in which medicine is a moral practice oriented to the patient’s health. A steadfast refusal intentionally to harm or kill is a touchstone of the Way of Medicine, one unambiguously affirmed by Christians through the centuries. Moreover, physician aid-in-dying contradicts one of the distinctive contributions that the Christian era brought to medicine, namely, a taken-for-granted solidarity between medical practitioners and those suffering illness and disability. Insofar as medical practitioners cooperate in aid-in-dying, they contradict this solidarity and undermine the trust that patients need to allow themselves to be cared for by physicians when they are sick and debilitated.","PeriodicalId":42894,"journal":{"name":"Christian Bioethics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbab010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The medical profession’s increasing acceptance of “physician aid-in-dying” indicates the ascendancy of what we call the provider-of-services model for medicine, in which medical “providers” offer services to help patients maximize their “well-being” according to the wishes of the patient. This model contrasts with and contradicts what we call the Way of Medicine, in which medicine is a moral practice oriented to the patient’s health. A steadfast refusal intentionally to harm or kill is a touchstone of the Way of Medicine, one unambiguously affirmed by Christians through the centuries. Moreover, physician aid-in-dying contradicts one of the distinctive contributions that the Christian era brought to medicine, namely, a taken-for-granted solidarity between medical practitioners and those suffering illness and disability. Insofar as medical practitioners cooperate in aid-in-dying, they contradict this solidarity and undermine the trust that patients need to allow themselves to be cared for by physicians when they are sick and debilitated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
防止自杀的医学:与那些因疾病和衰弱而减少的人保持团结
医学界越来越多地接受“医生协助死亡”,这表明我们所说的医疗服务提供者模式占据了优势,在这种模式下,医疗“提供者”根据患者的意愿提供服务,帮助患者最大限度地实现“幸福”。这种模式与我们所说的“医学之道”形成对比,并与之相矛盾。在“医学之道”中,医学是一种以病人健康为导向的道德实践。坚定地拒绝故意伤害或杀戮是医学之道的试金石,几个世纪以来,基督徒都毫不含糊地肯定了这一点。此外,医生协助死亡与基督教时代给医学带来的一个独特贡献相矛盾,即医生与那些患有疾病和残疾的人之间理所当然的团结。只要医疗从业者在协助死亡方面进行合作,他们就违背了这种团结,破坏了病人在生病和虚弱时需要允许医生照顾自己的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Uncertainty, Risk, and the Need for Trust in Our Hope for Health Inhumation as Theophanic Encounter: The Eastern Orthodox Rejection of Cremation Ectopic Pregnancy as Previable Delivery Artificial Wombs: Could They Deliver an Answer to the Problem of Frozen Embryos? Ectogestation and Humanity’s Whence? An Exploration with Saint Augustine and Karl Barth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1