Gina Pancorbo, Ricardo Primi, Oliver P. John, Daniel Santos, Filip De Fruyt
{"title":"Decomposing social-emotional skill rubrics: a methodological approach to examining acquiescence in rubrics’ ratings","authors":"Gina Pancorbo, Ricardo Primi, Oliver P. John, Daniel Santos, Filip De Fruyt","doi":"10.1080/0969594x.2023.2271679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rubrics are popular tools to assess students’ social-emotional skills. However, little research has been devoted to investigating whether rubrics’ performance level descriptions validly represent t...","PeriodicalId":51515,"journal":{"name":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment in Education-Principles Policy & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2023.2271679","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rubrics are popular tools to assess students’ social-emotional skills. However, little research has been devoted to investigating whether rubrics’ performance level descriptions validly represent t...
期刊介绍:
Recent decades have witnessed significant developments in the field of educational assessment. New approaches to the assessment of student achievement have been complemented by the increasing prominence of educational assessment as a policy issue. In particular, there has been a growth of interest in modes of assessment that promote, as well as measure, standards and quality. These have profound implications for individual learners, institutions and the educational system itself. Assessment in Education provides a focus for scholarly output in the field of assessment. The journal is explicitly international in focus and encourages contributions from a wide range of assessment systems and cultures. The journal''s intention is to explore both commonalities and differences in policy and practice.