Does high-latitude ionospheric electrodynamics exhibit hemispheric mirror symmetry?

IF 1.7 4区 地球科学 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Annales Geophysicae Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.5194/egusphere-2023-2920
Spencer Mark Hatch, Heikki Vanhamäki, Karl Magnus Laundal, Jone Peter Reistad, Johnathan Burchill, Levan Lomidze, David Knudsen, Michael Madelaire, Habtamu Tesfaw
{"title":"Does high-latitude ionospheric electrodynamics exhibit hemispheric mirror symmetry?","authors":"Spencer Mark Hatch, Heikki Vanhamäki, Karl Magnus Laundal, Jone Peter Reistad, Johnathan Burchill, Levan Lomidze, David Knudsen, Michael Madelaire, Habtamu Tesfaw","doi":"10.5194/egusphere-2023-2920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Ionospheric electrodynamics is a problem of mechanical stress balance mediated by electromagnetic forces. Joule heating (the total rate of frictional heating of thermospheric gases and ionospheric plasma) and ionospheric Hall and Pedersen conductances comprise three of the most basic descriptors of this problem. More than half a century after identification of their central role in ionospheric electrodynamics several important questions about these quantities, including the degree to which they exhibit hemispheric symmetry under reversal of the sign of dipole tilt and the sign of the <em>y</em> component of the interplanetary magnetic field (so-called \"mirror symmetry\"), remain unanswered. While global estimates of these key parameters can be obtained by combining existing empirical models, one often encounters some frustrating sources of uncertainty: the measurements from which such models are derived, usually magnetic field and electric field or ion drift measurements, are typically measured separately and do not necessarily align. The models to be combined moreover often use different input parameters, different assumptions about hemispheric symmetry, and/or different coordinate systems. We eliminate these sources of uncertainty in model predictions of electromagnetic work <strong>J</strong>⋅<strong>E</strong> (in general not equal to Joule heating <em>η</em><em>J</em><sup>2</sup>) and ionospheric conductances by combining two new empirical models of the high-latitude ionospheric electric potential and ionospheric currents that are derived in a mutually consistent fashion: these models do not assume any form of symmetry between the two hemispheres; are based on Apex coordinates, spherical harmonics, and the same model input parameters; and are derived exclusively from convection and magnetic field measurements made by the Swarm and CHAMP satellites. The model source code is open source and publicly available. Comparison of high-latitude distributions of electromagnetic work in each hemisphere as functions of dipole tilt and interplanetary magnetic field clock angle indicate that the typical assumption of mirror symmetry is largely justified. Model predictions of ionospheric Hall and Pedersen conductances exhibit a degree of symmetry, but clearly asymmetric responses to dipole tilt and solar wind driving conditions are also identified. The distinction between electromagnetic work and Joule heating allows us to identify where and under what conditions the assumption that the neutral wind corotates with the earth is not likely to be physically consistent with predicted Hall and Pedersen conductances.","PeriodicalId":50777,"journal":{"name":"Annales Geophysicae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Geophysicae","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Ionospheric electrodynamics is a problem of mechanical stress balance mediated by electromagnetic forces. Joule heating (the total rate of frictional heating of thermospheric gases and ionospheric plasma) and ionospheric Hall and Pedersen conductances comprise three of the most basic descriptors of this problem. More than half a century after identification of their central role in ionospheric electrodynamics several important questions about these quantities, including the degree to which they exhibit hemispheric symmetry under reversal of the sign of dipole tilt and the sign of the y component of the interplanetary magnetic field (so-called "mirror symmetry"), remain unanswered. While global estimates of these key parameters can be obtained by combining existing empirical models, one often encounters some frustrating sources of uncertainty: the measurements from which such models are derived, usually magnetic field and electric field or ion drift measurements, are typically measured separately and do not necessarily align. The models to be combined moreover often use different input parameters, different assumptions about hemispheric symmetry, and/or different coordinate systems. We eliminate these sources of uncertainty in model predictions of electromagnetic work JE (in general not equal to Joule heating ηJ2) and ionospheric conductances by combining two new empirical models of the high-latitude ionospheric electric potential and ionospheric currents that are derived in a mutually consistent fashion: these models do not assume any form of symmetry between the two hemispheres; are based on Apex coordinates, spherical harmonics, and the same model input parameters; and are derived exclusively from convection and magnetic field measurements made by the Swarm and CHAMP satellites. The model source code is open source and publicly available. Comparison of high-latitude distributions of electromagnetic work in each hemisphere as functions of dipole tilt and interplanetary magnetic field clock angle indicate that the typical assumption of mirror symmetry is largely justified. Model predictions of ionospheric Hall and Pedersen conductances exhibit a degree of symmetry, but clearly asymmetric responses to dipole tilt and solar wind driving conditions are also identified. The distinction between electromagnetic work and Joule heating allows us to identify where and under what conditions the assumption that the neutral wind corotates with the earth is not likely to be physically consistent with predicted Hall and Pedersen conductances.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高纬度电离层电动力学是否表现出半球镜像对称?
摘要。电离层电动力学是电磁力介导的机械应力平衡问题。焦耳加热(热层气体和电离层等离子体摩擦加热的总速率)和电离层霍尔和彼得森电导构成了这个问题的三个最基本的描述符。在确定它们在电离层电动力学中的核心作用半个多世纪之后,关于这些量的几个重要问题,包括它们在偶极倾斜符号反转下表现出半球对称性的程度和行星际磁场y分量的符号(所谓的“镜像对称”),仍然没有答案。虽然可以通过结合现有的经验模型来获得这些关键参数的全局估计,但人们经常遇到一些令人沮丧的不确定性来源:这些模型的测量结果,通常是磁场和电场或离子漂移测量,通常是单独测量的,不一定是一致的。此外,要组合的模型通常使用不同的输入参数,关于半球对称性的不同假设和/或不同的坐标系。我们通过结合高纬度电离层电势和电离层电流的两个新的经验模型,消除了电磁功J·E(通常不等于焦耳加热ηJ2)和电离层电导模型预测中的这些不确定性来源,这两个模型以相互一致的方式推导出来:这些模型不假设两个半球之间存在任何形式的对称;均基于顶点坐标、球面谐波和相同的模型输入参数;并且完全来自Swarm和CHAMP卫星所做的对流和磁场测量。模型源代码是开源的,并且是公开可用的。比较各半球电磁功的高纬度分布作为偶极子倾角和行星际磁场时钟角的函数表明,典型的镜面对称假设在很大程度上是正确的。电离层霍尔电导和彼得森电导的模型预测显示出一定程度的对称性,但对偶极倾斜和太阳风驱动条件的明显不对称响应也被确定。电磁功和焦耳热之间的区别使我们能够确定,在什么地方和什么条件下,中性风与地球同步的假设不太可能与预测的霍尔和彼得森电导在物理上一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales Geophysicae
Annales Geophysicae 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO) is a not-for-profit international multi- and inter-disciplinary scientific open-access journal in the field of solar–terrestrial and planetary sciences. ANGEO publishes original articles and short communications (letters) on research of the Sun–Earth system, including the science of space weather, solar–terrestrial plasma physics, the Earth''s ionosphere and atmosphere, the magnetosphere, and the study of planets and planetary systems, the interaction between the different spheres of a planet, and the interaction across the planetary system. Topics range from space weathering, planetary magnetic field, and planetary interior and surface dynamics to the formation and evolution of planetary systems.
期刊最新文献
Ionospheric upwelling and the level of associated noise at solar minimum Sensitivity analysis of a Martian atmospheric column model with data from the Mars Science Laboratory Low-frequency solar radio type II bursts and their association with space weather events during the ascending phase of solar cycle 25 The investigation of June 21 and 25, 2015 CMEs using EUHFORIA Observations of ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2020 Beirut explosion by Defense Meteorological Satellite Program and ground-based ionosondes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1