On Proof Complexity of Resolution over Polynomial Calculus

IF 0.7 4区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS ACM Transactions on Computational Logic Pub Date : 2022-07-22 DOI:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3506702
Erfan Khaniki
{"title":"On Proof Complexity of Resolution over Polynomial Calculus","authors":"Erfan Khaniki","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3506702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The proof system <sans-serif>Res (PC</sans-serif><sub><i>d,R</i></sub>) is a natural extension of the Resolution proof system that instead of disjunctions of literals operates with disjunctions of degree <i>d</i> multivariate polynomials over a ring <i>R</i> with Boolean variables. Proving super-polynomial lower bounds for the size of <sans-serif>Res</sans-serif>(<sans-serif>PC</sans-serif><sub>1,<i>R</i></sub>)-refutations of Conjunctive normal forms (CNFs) is one of the important problems in propositional proof complexity. The existence of such lower bounds is even open for <sans-serif>Res</sans-serif>(<sans-serif>PC</sans-serif><sub>1,𝔽</sub>) when 𝔽 is a finite field, such as 𝔽<sub>2</sub>. In this article, we investigate <sans-serif>Res</sans-serif>(<sans-serif>PC</sans-serif><sub><i>d,R</i></sub>) and tree-like <sans-serif>Res</sans-serif>(<sans-serif>PC</sans-serif><sub><i>d,R</i></sub>) and prove size-width relations for them when <i>R</i> is a finite ring. As an application, we prove new lower bounds and reprove some known lower bounds for every finite field 𝔽 as follows:\n<p><table border=\"0\" list-type=\"ordered\" width=\"95%\"><tr><td valign=\"top\"><p>(1)</p></td><td colspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\"><p>We prove almost quadratic lower bounds for <sans-serif>Res</sans-serif>(<sans-serif>PC</sans-serif><sub><i>d</i></sub>,𝔽)-refutations for every fixed <i>d</i>. The new lower bounds are for the following CNFs:</p><p><table border=\"0\" list-type=\"ordered\" width=\"95%\"><tr><td valign=\"top\"><p>(a)</p></td><td colspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\"><p>Mod <i>q</i> Tseitin formulas (<i>char</i>(𝔽)≠ <i>q</i>) and Flow formulas,</p></td></tr><tr><td valign=\"top\"><p>(b)</p></td><td colspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\"><p>Random <i>k</i>-CNFs with linearly many clauses.</p></td></tr></table></p></td></tr><tr><td valign=\"top\"><p>(2)</p></td><td colspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\"><p>We also prove super-polynomial (more than <i>n</i><sup><i>k</i></sup> for any fixed <i>k</i>) and also exponential (2<i><sup>nϵ</sup></i> for an ϵ &gt; 0) lower bounds for tree-like <sans-serif>Res</sans-serif>(<sans-serif>PC</sans-serif><sub><i>d</i>,𝔽</sub>)-refutations based on how big <i>d</i> is with respect to <i>n</i> for the following CNFs:</p><p><table border=\"0\" list-type=\"ordered\" width=\"95%\"><tr><td valign=\"top\"><p>(a)</p></td><td colspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\"><p>Mod <i>q</i> Tseitin formulas (<i>char</i>(𝔽)≠ <i>q</i>) and Flow formulas,</p></td></tr><tr><td valign=\"top\"><p>(b)</p></td><td colspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\"><p>Random <i>k</i>-CNFs of suitable densities,</p></td></tr><tr><td valign=\"top\"><p>(c)</p></td><td colspan=\"5\" valign=\"top\"><p>Pigeonhole principle and Counting mod <i>q</i> principle.</p></td></tr></table></p></td></tr></table></p> The lower bounds for the dag-like systems are the first nontrivial lower bounds for these systems, including the case <i>d</i>=1. The lower bounds for the tree-like systems were known for the case <i>d</i>=1 (except for the Counting mod <i>q</i> principle, in which lower bounds for the case <i>d</i>&gt; 1 were known too). Our lower bounds extend those results to the case where <i>d</i>&gt; 1 and also give new proofs for the case <i>d</i>=1.</p>","PeriodicalId":50916,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3506702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proof system Res (PCd,R) is a natural extension of the Resolution proof system that instead of disjunctions of literals operates with disjunctions of degree d multivariate polynomials over a ring R with Boolean variables. Proving super-polynomial lower bounds for the size of Res(PC1,R)-refutations of Conjunctive normal forms (CNFs) is one of the important problems in propositional proof complexity. The existence of such lower bounds is even open for Res(PC1,𝔽) when 𝔽 is a finite field, such as 𝔽2. In this article, we investigate Res(PCd,R) and tree-like Res(PCd,R) and prove size-width relations for them when R is a finite ring. As an application, we prove new lower bounds and reprove some known lower bounds for every finite field 𝔽 as follows:

(1)

We prove almost quadratic lower bounds for Res(PCd,𝔽)-refutations for every fixed d. The new lower bounds are for the following CNFs:

(a)

Mod q Tseitin formulas (char(𝔽)≠ q) and Flow formulas,

(b)

Random k-CNFs with linearly many clauses.

(2)

We also prove super-polynomial (more than nk for any fixed k) and also exponential (2 for an ϵ > 0) lower bounds for tree-like Res(PCd,𝔽)-refutations based on how big d is with respect to n for the following CNFs:

(a)

Mod q Tseitin formulas (char(𝔽)≠ q) and Flow formulas,

(b)

Random k-CNFs of suitable densities,

(c)

Pigeonhole principle and Counting mod q principle.

The lower bounds for the dag-like systems are the first nontrivial lower bounds for these systems, including the case d=1. The lower bounds for the tree-like systems were known for the case d=1 (except for the Counting mod q principle, in which lower bounds for the case d> 1 were known too). Our lower bounds extend those results to the case where d> 1 and also give new proofs for the case d=1.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多项式微积分解析度的证明复杂性
证明系统Res (PCd,R)是分辨力证明系统的自然扩展,该证明系统用布尔变量环R上d次多元多项式的析取来代替文字的析取。Res(PC1,R)大小的超多项式下界的证明是命题证明复杂性中的一个重要问题。当Res(PC1,∈)是有限域时,这种下界的存在性是开放的,例如𝔽2。本文研究了R (PCd,R)和树状R (PCd,R),并证明了它们在R是有限环时的大小-宽度关系。作为一个应用,我们证明了每个有限域的新下界和一些已知的下界,如下:(1)我们证明了Res(PCd)的几乎二次下界,对于每个固定的d,我们证明了Res(PCd)-反驳的近似二次下界。新的下界适用于以下cnf:(a)Mod q tseittin公式(char(∈)≠q)和Flow公式,(b)具有线性多子句的随机k- cnf。(2)我们还证明了超多项式(对于任何固定k大于nk)和指数(对于一个λ >0)以下CNFs的树状Res(PCd,∈)-基于d相对于n的多大的反驳的下界:(a)模q tsetin公式(char(∈)≠q)和Flow公式,(b)合适密度的随机k-CNFs,(c)鸽洞原理和计数模q原理。类dag系统的下界是这些系统的第一个非平凡下界,包括d=1的情况。在d=1的情况下,树形系统的下界是已知的(计数模q原则除外,在这种情况下,d>我也很出名)。我们的下界将这些结果扩展到d>并给出d=1的新证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: TOCL welcomes submissions related to all aspects of logic as it pertains to topics in computer science. This area has a great tradition in computer science. Several researchers who earned the ACM Turing award have also contributed to this field, namely Edgar Codd (relational database systems), Stephen Cook (complexity of logical theories), Edsger W. Dijkstra, Robert W. Floyd, Tony Hoare, Amir Pnueli, Dana Scott, Edmond M. Clarke, Allen E. Emerson, and Joseph Sifakis (program logics, program derivation and verification, programming languages semantics), Robin Milner (interactive theorem proving, concurrency calculi, and functional programming), and John McCarthy (functional programming and logics in AI). Logic continues to play an important role in computer science and has permeated several of its areas, including artificial intelligence, computational complexity, database systems, and programming languages. The Editorial Board of this journal seeks and hopes to attract high-quality submissions in all the above-mentioned areas of computational logic so that TOCL becomes the standard reference in the field. Both theoretical and applied papers are sought. Submissions showing novel use of logic in computer science are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Fundamental Logic is Decidable Strong Backdoors for Default Logic One or Nothing: Anti-unification over the Simply-Typed Lambda Calculus Stackelberg-Pareto Synthesis First-Order Temporal Logic on Finite Traces: Semantic Properties, Decidable Fragments, and Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1