Volatility Timing under Low-Volatility Strategy

Poh Ling Neo,Chyng Wen Tee
{"title":"Volatility Timing under Low-Volatility Strategy","authors":"Poh Ling Neo,Chyng Wen Tee","doi":"10.3905/jpm.2021.1.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors show that the slope of the volatility decile portfolio’s return profile contains valuable information that can be used to time volatility under different market conditions in the United States. During good (bad) market conditions, the high- (low-) volatility portfolio produces the highest return. The authors proceed to devise a volatility timing strategy based on statistical tests on the slope of the volatility decile portfolio’s return profile. Volatility timing is achieved by being aggressive during strong growth periods and conservative during market downturns. Superior performance is obtained, with an additional return of 4.1% observed in the volatility timing strategy, resulting in a fivefold improvement on accumulated wealth, along with statistically significant improvement in the Sortini ratio and the information ratio. The authors also demonstrate that stocks in the high-volatility portfolio are more strongly correlated compared to stocks in the low-volatility portfolio. Hence, the profitability of the volatility timing strategy can be attributed to successfully holding a diversified portfolio during bear markets and holding a concentrated growth portfolio during bull markets. Key Findings ▪ The return profile of the volatility decile portfolio is time-varying. Its slope contains vital information on market condition—high-volatility portfolio outperforms low-volatility portfolio during good market condition, but underperforms during bad market condition. Since market regime and asset price behaviors are persistent, the slope parameter can be used to time volatility exposure. ▪ Holding the low-volatility portfolio benefits from the higher risk-adjusted return during general market condition. However, when the slope parameter is positive and statistically significant, it is optimal to hold the high-volatility portfolio for the subsequent period. This will ride on the higher return of high-volatility portfolio during strong growth periods. This leads to higher return and increased volatility, but both Sortini ratio and Information ratio exhibit statistically significant improvement. ▪ Stocks in the low-volatility portfolio are less correlated than stocks in the high-volatility portfolio. The outperformance of the volatility timing strategy formulated in this article can be attributed to holding a concentrated growth portfolio during good market conditions, and holding a diversified portfolio during bad market conditions, thus connecting the literature on low-volatility portfolio with studies on correlation structure and diversification.","PeriodicalId":501547,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Portfolio Management","volume":"6 1","pages":"133-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2021.1.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors show that the slope of the volatility decile portfolio’s return profile contains valuable information that can be used to time volatility under different market conditions in the United States. During good (bad) market conditions, the high- (low-) volatility portfolio produces the highest return. The authors proceed to devise a volatility timing strategy based on statistical tests on the slope of the volatility decile portfolio’s return profile. Volatility timing is achieved by being aggressive during strong growth periods and conservative during market downturns. Superior performance is obtained, with an additional return of 4.1% observed in the volatility timing strategy, resulting in a fivefold improvement on accumulated wealth, along with statistically significant improvement in the Sortini ratio and the information ratio. The authors also demonstrate that stocks in the high-volatility portfolio are more strongly correlated compared to stocks in the low-volatility portfolio. Hence, the profitability of the volatility timing strategy can be attributed to successfully holding a diversified portfolio during bear markets and holding a concentrated growth portfolio during bull markets. Key Findings ▪ The return profile of the volatility decile portfolio is time-varying. Its slope contains vital information on market condition—high-volatility portfolio outperforms low-volatility portfolio during good market condition, but underperforms during bad market condition. Since market regime and asset price behaviors are persistent, the slope parameter can be used to time volatility exposure. ▪ Holding the low-volatility portfolio benefits from the higher risk-adjusted return during general market condition. However, when the slope parameter is positive and statistically significant, it is optimal to hold the high-volatility portfolio for the subsequent period. This will ride on the higher return of high-volatility portfolio during strong growth periods. This leads to higher return and increased volatility, but both Sortini ratio and Information ratio exhibit statistically significant improvement. ▪ Stocks in the low-volatility portfolio are less correlated than stocks in the high-volatility portfolio. The outperformance of the volatility timing strategy formulated in this article can be attributed to holding a concentrated growth portfolio during good market conditions, and holding a diversified portfolio during bad market conditions, thus connecting the literature on low-volatility portfolio with studies on correlation structure and diversification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低波动策略下的波动时机选择
作者表明,波动率十分位数投资组合收益曲线的斜率包含有价值的信息,可用于确定美国不同市场条件下的波动率。在好的(坏的)市场条件下,高(低)波动性的投资组合产生最高的回报。在波动性十分位数投资组合收益曲线斜率的统计检验基础上,设计了一种波动性择时策略。波动时机是通过在强劲增长时期积极进取和在市场低迷时期保守来实现的。获得了优异的表现,在波动择时策略中观察到4.1%的额外回报,导致累积财富提高了五倍,Sortini比率和信息比率在统计上也有显着改善。作者还证明,与低波动率投资组合中的股票相比,高波动率投资组合中的股票相关性更强。因此,波动择时策略的盈利能力可归因于在熊市期间成功持有多元化投资组合,在牛市期间成功持有集中增长投资组合。▪波动率十分位数投资组合的收益曲线是时变的。它的斜率包含了市场状况的重要信息——在良好的市场状况下,高波动率的投资组合表现优于低波动率的投资组合,但在糟糕的市场状况下表现不佳。由于市场机制和资产价格行为是持续的,斜率参数可以用于时间波动暴露。在一般市场条件下,持有低波动性的投资组合可从较高的风险调整回报中获益。然而,当斜率参数为正且具有统计学意义时,在后续阶段持有高波动性投资组合是最优的。这将依赖于高波动性投资组合在强劲增长时期的更高回报。这导致了更高的回报和波动性的增加,但Sortini比率和Information比率在统计学上都有显著的改善。▪低波动性投资组合中的股票相关性低于高波动性投资组合中的股票。本文制定的波动率择时策略的优异表现可以归结为在市场行情好的时候持有集中成长型投资组合,在市场行情不好的时候持有多元化投资组合,从而将关于低波动率投资组合的文献与相关结构和多元化的研究联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interview with Ian Toner, CFA, of verus Diversification and Asset Allocation in the Post-COVID Era Amortizing Volatility across Private Capital Investments The Factor Edge: Optimized Private Debt Investing (Re)Balancing Act: The Interplay of Private and Public Assets in Dialing the Asset Allocation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1