Aggregate Alpha in the Hedge Fund Industry: A Further Look at Best Ideas

F. Amir-Ghassemi,A. Papanicolaou,M. Perlow
{"title":"Aggregate Alpha in the Hedge Fund Industry: A Further Look at Best Ideas","authors":"F. Amir-Ghassemi,A. Papanicolaou,M. Perlow","doi":"10.3905/jpm.2021.1.313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is an examination of the stock-picking behavior of nearly 1,500 hedge funds using regulatory mandated position-level data from the SEC (Form 13F). Using data from June 1999 to December 2018, abnormal excess alpha is found on both a gross and dollar basis. Breaking the 20-year sample into two periods, the authors note a significant decline in gross alpha after the 2008 global financial crisis. In contrast, dollar alphas remain economically and statistically significant. This finding coincides with an increase in aggregate assets in the post-crisis period, suggesting asset growth may be impeding gross alphas. To test this hypothesis, the authors analyze the Best Ideas within manager portfolios. They find no significant difference between the alphas generated by managers’ Best Ideas and the rest of their portfolios, suggesting asset growth is not a significant determinant of alpha deterioration. These findings broadly contrast with prior studies conducted on mutual funds, suggesting differences in portfolio construction and incentive effects.","PeriodicalId":501547,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Portfolio Management","volume":"160 1","pages":"220-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2021.1.313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is an examination of the stock-picking behavior of nearly 1,500 hedge funds using regulatory mandated position-level data from the SEC (Form 13F). Using data from June 1999 to December 2018, abnormal excess alpha is found on both a gross and dollar basis. Breaking the 20-year sample into two periods, the authors note a significant decline in gross alpha after the 2008 global financial crisis. In contrast, dollar alphas remain economically and statistically significant. This finding coincides with an increase in aggregate assets in the post-crisis period, suggesting asset growth may be impeding gross alphas. To test this hypothesis, the authors analyze the Best Ideas within manager portfolios. They find no significant difference between the alphas generated by managers’ Best Ideas and the rest of their portfolios, suggesting asset growth is not a significant determinant of alpha deterioration. These findings broadly contrast with prior studies conducted on mutual funds, suggesting differences in portfolio construction and incentive effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对冲基金行业的总阿尔法:进一步审视最佳想法
本文使用美国证券交易委员会(SEC)规定的头寸数据(表格13F),对近1500家对冲基金的选股行为进行了研究。使用1999年6月至2018年12月的数据,在总额和美元基础上都发现了异常的超额alpha。作者将20年的样本分为两个时期,注意到2008年全球金融危机后总alpha显著下降。相比之下,美元阿尔法在经济和统计上仍具有重要意义。这一发现与后危机时期总资产的增加不谋而合,表明资产增长可能正在阻碍总阿尔法。为了验证这一假设,作者分析了经理组合中的最佳创意。他们发现,基金经理“最佳创意”产生的阿尔法指数与其他投资组合产生的阿尔法指数之间没有显著差异,这表明资产增长并不是阿尔法指数恶化的重要决定因素。这些发现与之前对共同基金的研究形成了广泛的对比,表明在投资组合构建和激励效应方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interview with Ian Toner, CFA, of verus Diversification and Asset Allocation in the Post-COVID Era Amortizing Volatility across Private Capital Investments The Factor Edge: Optimized Private Debt Investing (Re)Balancing Act: The Interplay of Private and Public Assets in Dialing the Asset Allocation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1