{"title":"Heckerthoughts","authors":"David Heckerman","doi":"arxiv-2302.05449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1987, Eric Horvitz, Greg Cooper, and I visited I.J. Good at his\nuniversity. We wanted to see him was not because he worked with Alan Turing to\nhelp win WWII by decoding encrypted messages from the Germans, although that\ncertainly intrigued us. Rather, we wanted to see him because we had just\nfinished reading his book \"Good Thinking,\" which summarized his life's work in\nProbability and its Applications. We were graduate students at Stanford working\nin AI, and amazed that his thinking was so similar to ours, having worked\ndecades before us and coming from such a seemingly different perspective not\ninvolving AI. This story is a fitting introduction this manuscript. Now having\nyears to look back on my work, to boil it down to its essence, and to better\nappreciate its significance (if any) in the evolution of AI and ML, I realized\nit was time to put my work in perspective, providing a roadmap to any who would\nlike to explore it. After I had this realization, it occurred to me that this\nis what I.J. Good did in his book. This manuscript is for those who want to\nunderstand basic concepts central to ML and AI and to learn about early\napplications of these concepts. Ironically, after I finished writing this\nmanuscript, I realized that a lot of the concepts that I included are missing\nin modern courses on ML. I hope this work will help to make up for these\nomissions. The presentation gets somewhat technical in parts, but I've tried to\nkeep the math to the bare minimum. In addition to the technical presentations,\nI include stories about how the ideas came to be and the effects they have had.\nWhen I was a student in physics, I was given dry texts to read. In class,\nhowever, several of my physics professors would tell stories around the work.\nThose stories fascinated me and really made the theory stick. So here, I do my\nbest to present both the ideas and the stories behind them.","PeriodicalId":501533,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - General Literature","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - General Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2302.05449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 1987, Eric Horvitz, Greg Cooper, and I visited I.J. Good at his
university. We wanted to see him was not because he worked with Alan Turing to
help win WWII by decoding encrypted messages from the Germans, although that
certainly intrigued us. Rather, we wanted to see him because we had just
finished reading his book "Good Thinking," which summarized his life's work in
Probability and its Applications. We were graduate students at Stanford working
in AI, and amazed that his thinking was so similar to ours, having worked
decades before us and coming from such a seemingly different perspective not
involving AI. This story is a fitting introduction this manuscript. Now having
years to look back on my work, to boil it down to its essence, and to better
appreciate its significance (if any) in the evolution of AI and ML, I realized
it was time to put my work in perspective, providing a roadmap to any who would
like to explore it. After I had this realization, it occurred to me that this
is what I.J. Good did in his book. This manuscript is for those who want to
understand basic concepts central to ML and AI and to learn about early
applications of these concepts. Ironically, after I finished writing this
manuscript, I realized that a lot of the concepts that I included are missing
in modern courses on ML. I hope this work will help to make up for these
omissions. The presentation gets somewhat technical in parts, but I've tried to
keep the math to the bare minimum. In addition to the technical presentations,
I include stories about how the ideas came to be and the effects they have had.
When I was a student in physics, I was given dry texts to read. In class,
however, several of my physics professors would tell stories around the work.
Those stories fascinated me and really made the theory stick. So here, I do my
best to present both the ideas and the stories behind them.