Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis in Zanzibar: a cost effectiveness study comparing conventional, biologic, and targeted-synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

Sanaa Suleiman Said, Melf-Jakob Kühl, Bjørg-Tilde Svanes Fevang, Tone Wikene Nystad, Kjell Arne Johansson
{"title":"Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis in Zanzibar: a cost effectiveness study comparing conventional, biologic, and targeted-synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs","authors":"Sanaa Suleiman Said, Melf-Jakob Kühl, Bjørg-Tilde Svanes Fevang, Tone Wikene Nystad, Kjell Arne Johansson","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.05.23299489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the cost effectiveness of six disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treat-to-target treatment strategies for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Zanzibar.\nA Markov model was used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of various DMARD strategies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis over a three-year period. A health-provider perspective was used and only outpatient costs were considered. The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was utilized for measurement of efficacy and values were obtained from literature. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were obtained from 122 patients attending the rheumatology clinic at Mnazi Mmoja Hospital. Data on costs were obtained from the central medical stores and hospital administration. Treatment strategies were given in sequential approach based on treat to target goals of therapy. This included methotrexate monotherapy, methotrexate + sulfasalazine + hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate followed by one or two biologic/targeted-synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs). Probabilistic and one way sensitivity analysis were performed. Scenario analysis was undertaken comparing drug prices from India and Scandinavia.\nCosts of therapy/patient/three years ranged from USD 634 for methotrexate monotherapy and USD 5011 for methotrexate and two consecutive b/tsDMARDs. The highest and lowest effects were 2.209 and 2.079 QALYs gained from methotrexate therapy + two consecutive b/tsDMARDs and methotrexate monotherapy, respectively. From a healthcare perspective methotrexate monotherapy was the cost-effective option at a willingness to pay of USD 282. Pairwise comparison also favored methotrexate monotherapy as the feasible option. We found that increasing the willingness to pay led to a change in the most acceptable option from methotrexate monotherapy to methotrexate followed by b/tsDMARD.\nMethotrexate monotherapy is the cost-effective option for the management of rheumatoid arthritis in Zanzibar. Other options may be feasible if the willingness to pay threshold is increased or the drug prices are lowered, particularly for the b/tsDMARDs.","PeriodicalId":501072,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.23299489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the cost effectiveness of six disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treat-to-target treatment strategies for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Zanzibar. A Markov model was used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of various DMARD strategies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis over a three-year period. A health-provider perspective was used and only outpatient costs were considered. The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was utilized for measurement of efficacy and values were obtained from literature. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were obtained from 122 patients attending the rheumatology clinic at Mnazi Mmoja Hospital. Data on costs were obtained from the central medical stores and hospital administration. Treatment strategies were given in sequential approach based on treat to target goals of therapy. This included methotrexate monotherapy, methotrexate + sulfasalazine + hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate followed by one or two biologic/targeted-synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs). Probabilistic and one way sensitivity analysis were performed. Scenario analysis was undertaken comparing drug prices from India and Scandinavia. Costs of therapy/patient/three years ranged from USD 634 for methotrexate monotherapy and USD 5011 for methotrexate and two consecutive b/tsDMARDs. The highest and lowest effects were 2.209 and 2.079 QALYs gained from methotrexate therapy + two consecutive b/tsDMARDs and methotrexate monotherapy, respectively. From a healthcare perspective methotrexate monotherapy was the cost-effective option at a willingness to pay of USD 282. Pairwise comparison also favored methotrexate monotherapy as the feasible option. We found that increasing the willingness to pay led to a change in the most acceptable option from methotrexate monotherapy to methotrexate followed by b/tsDMARD. Methotrexate monotherapy is the cost-effective option for the management of rheumatoid arthritis in Zanzibar. Other options may be feasible if the willingness to pay threshold is increased or the drug prices are lowered, particularly for the b/tsDMARDs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在桑给巴尔治疗类风湿关节炎:比较传统、生物和靶向合成改变疾病抗风湿药物的成本效益研究
采用马尔可夫模型计算三年内治疗类风湿关节炎的各种DMARD策略的成本效益。该模型从医疗服务提供者的角度出发,仅考虑了门诊费用。临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)用于衡量疗效,其数值来自文献。质量调整生命年(QALYs)是从姆纳齐-姆莫贾医院风湿病诊所的 122 名患者处获得的。成本数据来自中央医药商店和医院管理部门。治疗策略根据治疗目标按顺序进行。其中包括甲氨蝶呤单药治疗、甲氨蝶呤+柳氮磺胺吡啶+羟氯喹、甲氨蝶呤后加一种或两种生物/靶向合成DMARDs(b/tsDMARDs)。进行了概率分析和单向敏感性分析。对印度和斯堪的纳维亚的药品价格进行了情景分析比较。每名患者/三年的治疗成本从甲氨蝶呤单一疗法的 634 美元到甲氨蝶呤和两种连续的 b/tsDMARDs 的 5011 美元不等。甲氨蝶呤疗法+两种连续的 b/tsDMARDs 和甲氨蝶呤单一疗法的最高和最低疗效分别为 2.209 和 2.079 QALYs。从医疗角度来看,甲氨蝶呤单药治疗的成本效益最高,支付意愿为 282 美元。配对比较也显示氨甲喋呤单一疗法是可行的方案。我们发现,支付意愿的提高导致最可接受的方案从甲氨蝶呤单药治疗变为先用甲氨蝶呤后用 b/tsDMARD 治疗。在桑给巴尔,甲氨蝶呤单药治疗是治疗类风湿性关节炎最经济有效的方案。如果提高支付意愿阈值或降低药物价格,特别是 b/tsDMARDs 的价格,其他方案也是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Co-developing a comprehensive disease policy model with stakeholders: the case of malaria during pregnancy How does participation in coal-to-gas policy and availability of natural gas pipelines affect residents' well-being? Causally-informative analyses of the effect of job displacement on all-cause and specific-cause mortality from the 1990s Finnish recession until 2020: A population registry study Privacy Protection of Sexually Transmitted Infections Information from Chinese Electronic Medical Records Quantifying the health impact of crop breeding: Revisiting the Disability-Adjusted Life Years Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1