Cost minimization analysis of treatments for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: Fixed-Dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injections

Miguel Figallo, María F Delgado, Mauricio Gonzalez, Adrián Arenas
{"title":"Cost minimization analysis of treatments for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: Fixed-Dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injections","authors":"Miguel Figallo, María F Delgado, Mauricio Gonzalez, Adrián Arenas","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.05.23299511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this study is to determine whether the employment of fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (or Phesgo) to treat metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients would minimize costs compared to the traditional treatment of separate intravenous doses of pertuzumab and trastuzumab in Peru. To achieve this, we used EsSalud (the social security health insurance) data and assessed it through a mixed strategy, which consisted of a quantitative and a qualitative approach. The first one aimed to calculate the direct (non-drug consumables, drugs, and healthcare professionals) and indirect costs of both treatments to develop a comparison, whilst the second aimed to validate information and internalize the procedure in an EsSalud context.\nOverall, we found that the usage of Phesgo would be cost saving in EsSalud’s context. Specifically, we found three main insights. Firstly, the savings produced from switching from the traditional intravenous treatment to the subcutaneous one would allow EsSalud to afford full annual costs of 2 additional treatments, but without increasing their budget. This would cover 7% of the gap of 29 patients who do not have access to full treatment. Secondly, the result of a univariate sensitivity analysis in this work indicates that the price of Phesgo would have to increase by 16% so that both treatments cost the same. Thirdly, to increase the number of patients, the intravenous treatment would have to be totally replace by the Phesgo treatment, since the use of the latter requires less personnel and infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":501072,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Economics","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.23299511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to determine whether the employment of fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (or Phesgo) to treat metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients would minimize costs compared to the traditional treatment of separate intravenous doses of pertuzumab and trastuzumab in Peru. To achieve this, we used EsSalud (the social security health insurance) data and assessed it through a mixed strategy, which consisted of a quantitative and a qualitative approach. The first one aimed to calculate the direct (non-drug consumables, drugs, and healthcare professionals) and indirect costs of both treatments to develop a comparison, whilst the second aimed to validate information and internalize the procedure in an EsSalud context. Overall, we found that the usage of Phesgo would be cost saving in EsSalud’s context. Specifically, we found three main insights. Firstly, the savings produced from switching from the traditional intravenous treatment to the subcutaneous one would allow EsSalud to afford full annual costs of 2 additional treatments, but without increasing their budget. This would cover 7% of the gap of 29 patients who do not have access to full treatment. Secondly, the result of a univariate sensitivity analysis in this work indicates that the price of Phesgo would have to increase by 16% so that both treatments cost the same. Thirdly, to increase the number of patients, the intravenous treatment would have to be totally replace by the Phesgo treatment, since the use of the latter requires less personnel and infrastructure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转移性 HER2 阳性乳腺癌治疗成本最小化分析:百妥珠单抗和曲妥珠单抗皮下注射固定剂量联合疗法
本研究的主要目的是确定在秘鲁,采用皮下注射固定剂量百妥珠单抗和曲妥珠单抗复方制剂(或称 Phesgo)治疗转移性 HER2 阳性乳腺癌患者,与传统的分别静脉注射百妥珠单抗和曲妥珠单抗的治疗方法相比,是否能最大限度地降低成本。为此,我们使用了 EsSalud(社会保障医疗保险)的数据,并通过定量和定性相结合的混合策略进行了评估。第一种方法旨在计算两种治疗方法的直接成本(非药物消耗品、药物和医护人员)和间接成本,以便进行比较;第二种方法旨在验证信息,并在 EsSalud 的背景下将程序内部化。具体来说,我们发现了三个主要的启示。首先,从传统的静脉注射治疗转为皮下注射治疗所节省的费用将使 EsSalud 能够在不增加预算的情况下承担额外两次治疗的全部年度费用。这将弥补 29 名无法获得全面治疗的病人中 7%的缺口。其次,这项工作中的单变量敏感性分析结果表明,Phesgo 的价格必须提高 16%,这样两种治疗方法的费用才会相同。第三,为了增加患者人数,必须用 Phesgo 治疗完全取代静脉注射治疗,因为使用 Phesgo 治疗所需的人员和基础设施较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Co-developing a comprehensive disease policy model with stakeholders: the case of malaria during pregnancy How does participation in coal-to-gas policy and availability of natural gas pipelines affect residents' well-being? Causally-informative analyses of the effect of job displacement on all-cause and specific-cause mortality from the 1990s Finnish recession until 2020: A population registry study Privacy Protection of Sexually Transmitted Infections Information from Chinese Electronic Medical Records Quantifying the health impact of crop breeding: Revisiting the Disability-Adjusted Life Years Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1