Kinematic Internal Forces of Free-Head Single Piles Subjected to Seismic Loading: Shaking Table Testing and Numerical Simulation

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL International Journal of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1007/s40999-023-00915-4
Milad Aghamolaei, Alireza Saeedi Azizkandi, Ali Abolhasanpoor
{"title":"Kinematic Internal Forces of Free-Head Single Piles Subjected to Seismic Loading: Shaking Table Testing and Numerical Simulation","authors":"Milad Aghamolaei, Alireza Saeedi Azizkandi, Ali Abolhasanpoor","doi":"10.1007/s40999-023-00915-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil and pile interaction could significantly contribute to the response of the system and should be considered in the design prospect. To address some of the uncertainties, a series of 1 g shaking table tests followed by numerical simulations were conducted to address the seismic response of free-head single piles embedded in dry sand subjected to seismic waves of which horizontal acceleration and bending moments are the prime indexes. Subsequently, the validated numerical model was employed to perform parametric studies, focusing on normalized induced kinematic forces based on the soil profile type. The numerical results showed that not only does the soil profile type considerably affect the amplitudes of the maximum normalized seismic forces but also the distributions of these response parameters are highly dependent on soil type. The results also demonstrated that neglecting slippage and/or separation along the soil–pile interface leads to underestimation of the maximum normalized kinematic bending moment and shear force by up to 17.5% and 70%, respectively. Soil type also affects the induced forces by about 60% indicating that the design consequence of which could be dire. Therefore, it is concluded that the effects of slippage and/or separation can be considerable and hence, should be taken into consideration to prevent probable damages in seismic areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":50331,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00915-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil and pile interaction could significantly contribute to the response of the system and should be considered in the design prospect. To address some of the uncertainties, a series of 1 g shaking table tests followed by numerical simulations were conducted to address the seismic response of free-head single piles embedded in dry sand subjected to seismic waves of which horizontal acceleration and bending moments are the prime indexes. Subsequently, the validated numerical model was employed to perform parametric studies, focusing on normalized induced kinematic forces based on the soil profile type. The numerical results showed that not only does the soil profile type considerably affect the amplitudes of the maximum normalized seismic forces but also the distributions of these response parameters are highly dependent on soil type. The results also demonstrated that neglecting slippage and/or separation along the soil–pile interface leads to underestimation of the maximum normalized kinematic bending moment and shear force by up to 17.5% and 70%, respectively. Soil type also affects the induced forces by about 60% indicating that the design consequence of which could be dire. Therefore, it is concluded that the effects of slippage and/or separation can be considerable and hence, should be taken into consideration to prevent probable damages in seismic areas.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
承受地震荷载的自由头单桩的运动内力:振动台测试和数值模拟
土壤和桩的相互作用会对系统的响应产生重大影响,因此在设计时应加以考虑。为了解决一些不确定因素,我们进行了一系列 1 g 振动台试验,然后进行了数值模拟,以解决嵌入干砂中的自由头单桩在地震波作用下的地震响应问题,其中水平加速度和弯矩是主要指标。随后,利用经过验证的数值模型进行参数研究,重点研究基于土壤剖面类型的归一化诱导运动力。数值结果表明,土壤剖面类型不仅极大地影响了最大归一化地震力的振幅,而且这些响应参数的分布也与土壤类型密切相关。结果还表明,忽略土-桩界面的滑动和/或分离会导致最大归一化运动弯矩和剪力被低估,低估幅度分别高达 17.5% 和 70%。土壤类型对诱导力的影响也达到 60%左右,这表明其设计后果可能非常严重。因此,可以得出结论,滑移和/或分离的影响可能相当大,因此应加以考虑,以防止地震地区可能出现的破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
15 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Civil Engineering, The official publication of Iranian Society of Civil Engineering and Iran University of Science and Technology is devoted to original and interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of civil engineering with similar emphasis on all topics.The journal provides a forum for the International Civil Engineering Community to present and discuss matters of major interest e.g. new developments in civil regulations, The topics are included but are not necessarily restricted to :- Structures- Geotechnics- Transportation- Environment- Earthquakes- Water Resources- Construction Engineering and Management, and New Materials.
期刊最新文献
Experimental and Analytical Study of Tensile and Bond Performances of Glass Fabric Reinforced Cementitious Matrix for Retrofit Applications on Concrete Surfaces Boundary Effects for ESB Container in Dynamic Centrifuge Test Incorporating Numerical Simulation Modeling Disruption in the Rail-Road Network and Identifying Critical Terminals Mechanical Behaviors of Steel Segment Support Structures for TBM-Excavated Coal Mine Tunnels: Experimental and Numerical Study Numerical Investigation on the Efficiency of Self-Centering Two-Yield Buckling Restrained Brace on Low-Rise Steel Frames
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1