The Role of Early Brain Injury assessment in a-SAH in predicting Structural Brain Abnormalities in Cognitive Impairments

Mingdong Wang, Qian-Hui Fu, Andrew Ni, Yun-Peng Yuan, Chun-Hui Li, Zhan Xiang WANG, Hong Wang
{"title":"The Role of Early Brain Injury assessment in a-SAH in predicting Structural Brain Abnormalities in Cognitive Impairments","authors":"Mingdong Wang, Qian-Hui Fu, Andrew Ni, Yun-Peng Yuan, Chun-Hui Li, Zhan Xiang WANG, Hong Wang","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.05.23299565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Early brain edema and/or Hematoma after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (a-SAH) is an important impact determinant of clinical cognition outcomes. However, due to the lack of early assessment of the impact on cognitive structural systems, Therefore, there is a need to develop early predictive and/or decision-making models, termed the a-SAH Early Brain Edema/Hematoma Compression Neural (Structural Brain) Networks Score System (SEBE-HCNNSS). Methods 202 consecutive patients with spontaneous a-SAH and initial CT/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (24 h of ictus) and follow-up 2 months. Clinically relevant factors and a variety of traditional different scale ratings were defined using Linear regression analysis (Univariate, multivariate). The risk factors with highest values for area under the curve (AUC) were included in the multivariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis or Cox regression analysis.\nResults A total of 177 patients were enrolled in this study, 43 patients had a high SEBE-HCNNSS classification (grade 3 to 5). After a mean follow-up of 2month, 121 individuals (68.36%) with a-SAH and 3 control subjects had incident CI. The CT inter-observer reliability of the SEBE-HCNNSS scale was high, with a Kappa value of 1. ROC analysis showed that the SEBE-HCNNSS scale (OR 3.322, 95% CI 2.312-7.237, p = 0.00025) was determined to be an independent predictor of edema, CI and unfavorable prognosis. These results were replicated in validation cohort.\nConclusions SEBE-HCNNSS scale is fairly easy to perform and this study indicates that is good predictor value for CI and clinical outcomes after SAH. we suggest that it is practically useful prognostic instrument for the risk evaluation after a-SAH.","PeriodicalId":501051,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.23299565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Early brain edema and/or Hematoma after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (a-SAH) is an important impact determinant of clinical cognition outcomes. However, due to the lack of early assessment of the impact on cognitive structural systems, Therefore, there is a need to develop early predictive and/or decision-making models, termed the a-SAH Early Brain Edema/Hematoma Compression Neural (Structural Brain) Networks Score System (SEBE-HCNNSS). Methods 202 consecutive patients with spontaneous a-SAH and initial CT/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (24 h of ictus) and follow-up 2 months. Clinically relevant factors and a variety of traditional different scale ratings were defined using Linear regression analysis (Univariate, multivariate). The risk factors with highest values for area under the curve (AUC) were included in the multivariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis or Cox regression analysis. Results A total of 177 patients were enrolled in this study, 43 patients had a high SEBE-HCNNSS classification (grade 3 to 5). After a mean follow-up of 2month, 121 individuals (68.36%) with a-SAH and 3 control subjects had incident CI. The CT inter-observer reliability of the SEBE-HCNNSS scale was high, with a Kappa value of 1. ROC analysis showed that the SEBE-HCNNSS scale (OR 3.322, 95% CI 2.312-7.237, p = 0.00025) was determined to be an independent predictor of edema, CI and unfavorable prognosis. These results were replicated in validation cohort. Conclusions SEBE-HCNNSS scale is fairly easy to perform and this study indicates that is good predictor value for CI and clinical outcomes after SAH. we suggest that it is practically useful prognostic instrument for the risk evaluation after a-SAH.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
a-SAH 早期脑损伤评估在预测认知障碍的脑结构异常中的作用
背景 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(a-SAH)后的早期脑水肿和/或血肿是决定临床认知结果的重要影响因素。然而,由于缺乏对认知结构系统影响的早期评估,因此需要开发早期预测和/或决策模型,即 a-SAH 早期脑水肿/血肿压迫神经(脑结构)网络评分系统(SEBE-HCNNSS)。方法 202 例自发性 a-SAH 连续患者和初始 CT/磁共振成像 (MRI) 扫描(发病 24 小时),随访 2 个月。通过线性回归分析(单变量和多变量)确定了临床相关因素和各种传统的不同量表评级。曲线下面积(AUC)值最高的风险因素被纳入多变量分析和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)分析或 Cox 回归分析。平均随访2个月后,121名a-SAH患者(68.36%)和3名对照组患者发生了CI。ROC分析表明,SEBE-HCNNSS量表(OR 3.322,95% CI 2.312-7.237,p = 0.00025)是水肿、CI和不良预后的独立预测因子。结论 SEBE-HCNNSS 量表非常容易操作,本研究表明它对 SAH 后的 CI 和临床预后有很好的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The VIPR-1 trial (Visualizing Ischemia in the Pancreatic Remnant) - Assessing the role of intraoperative indocyanine green perfusion of the transected pancreas in predicting postoperative pancreatic leaks: protocol for a prospective phase II trial. Insulin-dependence as a Predictor of Shortened Cancer-specific Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study from the United States Neuroendocrine Study Group Chyme Reinfusion Practices in the Neonatal Population Traumatic Amputations - A Nationwide Epidemiological Analysis of a developing country over 16 years Development and Validation of Collaborative Robot-assisted Cutting Method for Iliac Crest Flap Raising: Randomized Crossover Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1