In house-development of a rapid immunochromatographic test for the detection of Escherichia coli in urine samples

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ram.2023.10.001
Paula Da Cunda , Amy Mónaco , María Moreno , María José Gonzalez , Paola Scavone , Luciana Robino
{"title":"In house-development of a rapid immunochromatographic test for the detection of Escherichia coli in urine samples","authors":"Paula Da Cunda ,&nbsp;Amy Mónaco ,&nbsp;María Moreno ,&nbsp;María José Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Paola Scavone ,&nbsp;Luciana Robino","doi":"10.1016/j.ram.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common health concern. Urine culture is the “gold standard” for UTI diagnosis but takes 48<!--> <!-->h. Rapid methods like dipstick tests are used as point-of-care tests. However, their sensitivity and specificity are variable. In this work, a rapid immunochromatographic test (IT) for detecting <em>Escherichia coli</em> in urine was developed, and its performance was evaluated in urine samples from patients with suspected UTI. The “universal lateral flow assay kit” was employed using an <em>E. coli</em> capture antibody. One hundred and five (105) urine samples were analyzed using the IT, dipstick test, and urine culture. The sensitivity of the IT was 74.5%, specificity 88.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 86.3%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 78.7%. The combination of the IT with the dipstick test increases sensitivity to 94.1%, specificity to 66.7%, PPV to 72.7%, and NPV to 92.3%. Using the IT for detecting <em>E. coli</em> in urine could be a valuable technique for UTI screening, showing better specificity and diagnostic precision but lower sensitivity than the dipstick test. Based on these results, we propose that the combined use of both screening techniques would allow a rapid and more precise diagnosis of UTI, rationalizing the indication for empirical antibiotics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000846/pdfft?md5=5dd878bb5bfa171fb4bec9b4b72511e8&pid=1-s2.0-S0325754123000846-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000846","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common health concern. Urine culture is the “gold standard” for UTI diagnosis but takes 48 h. Rapid methods like dipstick tests are used as point-of-care tests. However, their sensitivity and specificity are variable. In this work, a rapid immunochromatographic test (IT) for detecting Escherichia coli in urine was developed, and its performance was evaluated in urine samples from patients with suspected UTI. The “universal lateral flow assay kit” was employed using an E. coli capture antibody. One hundred and five (105) urine samples were analyzed using the IT, dipstick test, and urine culture. The sensitivity of the IT was 74.5%, specificity 88.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 86.3%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 78.7%. The combination of the IT with the dipstick test increases sensitivity to 94.1%, specificity to 66.7%, PPV to 72.7%, and NPV to 92.3%. Using the IT for detecting E. coli in urine could be a valuable technique for UTI screening, showing better specificity and diagnostic precision but lower sensitivity than the dipstick test. Based on these results, we propose that the combined use of both screening techniques would allow a rapid and more precise diagnosis of UTI, rationalizing the indication for empirical antibiotics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内部开发用于检测尿液样本中大肠杆菌的快速免疫层析检测法
尿路感染(UTI)是一种常见的健康问题。尿培养是诊断尿路感染的 "金标准",但需要 48 小时。然而,它们的灵敏度和特异性各不相同。本研究开发了一种检测尿液中大肠埃希菌的快速免疫层析检测法(IT),并在疑似尿毒症患者的尿样中对其性能进行了评估。采用 "通用侧流检测试剂盒",使用大肠杆菌捕获抗体。对 105 份尿液样本进行了分析,分别使用了 IT、浸量尺检测法和尿培养法。IT 的灵敏度为 74.5%,特异性为 88.9%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 86.3%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 78.7%。将 IT 与浸量尺检测结合使用可将灵敏度提高到 94.1%,特异性提高到 66.7%,PPV 提高到 72.7%,NPV 提高到 92.3%。使用 IT 检测尿液中的大肠杆菌可能是一种有价值的尿路感染筛查技术,其特异性和诊断精确度均优于浸量棒检测,但灵敏度低于浸量棒检测。基于这些结果,我们建议将这两种筛查技术结合起来使用,这样就能更快速、更准确地诊断出尿毒症,从而合理地确定经验性抗生素的适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1