Probabilistic analysis of operational ice damage for Polar class vessels using full-scale data

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structural Safety Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102423
Mikko Suominen , Mihkel Kõrgesaar , Rocky Taylor , Martin Bergström
{"title":"Probabilistic analysis of operational ice damage for Polar class vessels using full-scale data","authors":"Mikko Suominen ,&nbsp;Mihkel Kõrgesaar ,&nbsp;Rocky Taylor ,&nbsp;Martin Bergström","doi":"10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To ensure the safety of maritime operations in polar waters, the IMO enforced the International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code) in 2017. To address ice navigation related risks, the Polar Code refers to a set of guidelines known as the Polar Operational Limit Assessment Risk Indexing System (POLARIS). Following POLARIS, operational limits for ice navigation are defined based on the Risk Index Outcome (RIO) value, which takes into account the prevailing ice conditions and the ice class of a ship.</p><p>Recent studies indicate that the POLARIS guidelines are well-founded. However, no direct relationship between RIO values and the probability of an ice-induced hull structural damage has been established. To enable a more accurate analysis of ice navigation risks, this article addresses this issue by (i) relating measured ice-induced loads to RIO values corresponding to the ice conditions in which the loads were measured, (ii) calculating the load limits for plastic deformation and rupture of the ice belt of hull structures representing different ice classes, and (iii) defining the probability of structural damage for different load limits. The study utilizes long-term full-scale ice load measurements carried out onboard Polar Supply and Research Vessel (PSRV) S.A. Agulhas II in the Antarctic Ocean. The load limits were calculated for ice class standards, PC3, PC4, PC5, PC6, and PC7 in accordance with the Unified Requirements of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS).</p><p>On a general level, the results are consistent with earlier findings indicating that the POLARIS guidelines are well-founded. If a ship operates mainly at ‘normal operation’ level, the probability for fracture at hull are at probability levels of 10<sup>-3</sup> and 10<sup>-4</sup> for ice classes PC3 to PC5. The probability levels for PC6 and PC7 are higher that is possibly a result from conservative load probability distributions. When the portion of operations at ‘special consideration’ level becomes significant, the probability of fracture at the hull increases significantly. However, large ice thicknesses and the largest load magnitudes may be associated with positive RIO values. Some inconsistencies are recognized, and the uncertainty and limitations of the analysis are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21978,"journal":{"name":"Structural Safety","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102423"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473023001108/pdfft?md5=46a6f41b2608d4c2632fbd50ca45bbd2&pid=1-s2.0-S0167473023001108-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473023001108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To ensure the safety of maritime operations in polar waters, the IMO enforced the International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code) in 2017. To address ice navigation related risks, the Polar Code refers to a set of guidelines known as the Polar Operational Limit Assessment Risk Indexing System (POLARIS). Following POLARIS, operational limits for ice navigation are defined based on the Risk Index Outcome (RIO) value, which takes into account the prevailing ice conditions and the ice class of a ship.

Recent studies indicate that the POLARIS guidelines are well-founded. However, no direct relationship between RIO values and the probability of an ice-induced hull structural damage has been established. To enable a more accurate analysis of ice navigation risks, this article addresses this issue by (i) relating measured ice-induced loads to RIO values corresponding to the ice conditions in which the loads were measured, (ii) calculating the load limits for plastic deformation and rupture of the ice belt of hull structures representing different ice classes, and (iii) defining the probability of structural damage for different load limits. The study utilizes long-term full-scale ice load measurements carried out onboard Polar Supply and Research Vessel (PSRV) S.A. Agulhas II in the Antarctic Ocean. The load limits were calculated for ice class standards, PC3, PC4, PC5, PC6, and PC7 in accordance with the Unified Requirements of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS).

On a general level, the results are consistent with earlier findings indicating that the POLARIS guidelines are well-founded. If a ship operates mainly at ‘normal operation’ level, the probability for fracture at hull are at probability levels of 10-3 and 10-4 for ice classes PC3 to PC5. The probability levels for PC6 and PC7 are higher that is possibly a result from conservative load probability distributions. When the portion of operations at ‘special consideration’ level becomes significant, the probability of fracture at the hull increases significantly. However, large ice thicknesses and the largest load magnitudes may be associated with positive RIO values. Some inconsistencies are recognized, and the uncertainty and limitations of the analysis are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用全尺寸数据对极地级船舶的运行冰损进行概率分析
为确保极地水域的海上作业安全,国际海事组织于 2017 年实施了《极地水域船舶作业国际规则》(《极地规则》)。为了应对与冰上航行相关的风险,《极地规则》参考了一套被称为极地作业限制评估风险指数系统(POLARIS)的准则。根据 POLARIS,冰上航行的操作限制是根据风险指数结果(RIO)值确定的,该值考虑了当时的冰况和船舶的冰级。然而,尚未确定 RIO 值与冰导致船体结构损坏的概率之间的直接关系。为了更准确地分析冰上航行风险,本文通过以下方法来解决这一问题:(i) 将测得的冰上载荷与与测得载荷的冰况相对应的 RIO 值联系起来;(ii) 计算代表不同冰级的船体结构的塑性变形和冰带破裂的载荷极限;(iii) 确定不同载荷极限下的结构损坏概率。该研究利用了在南极海洋极地补给和研究船(PSRV)S.A. Agulhas II 上进行的长期全尺寸冰载荷测量。根据国际船级社协会 (IACS) 的统一要求,计算出了 PC3、PC4、PC5、PC6 和 PC7 冰级标准的负载极限。如果船舶主要在 "正常运行 "水平下运行,冰级 PC3 至 PC5 的船体断裂概率分别为 10-3 和 10-4。PC6 和 PC7 的概率水平较高,这可能是由于保守的负载概率分布造成的。当处于 "特别考虑 "级别的运行比例变得很大时,船体断裂的概率会显著增加。然而,大的冰层厚度和最大的载荷量级可能与正的 RIO 值有关。我们认识到了一些不一致之处,并讨论了分析的不确定性和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Safety
Structural Safety 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Structural Safety is an international journal devoted to integrated risk assessment for a wide range of constructed facilities such as buildings, bridges, earth structures, offshore facilities, dams, lifelines and nuclear structural systems. Its purpose is to foster communication about risk and reliability among technical disciplines involved in design and construction, and to enhance the use of risk management in the constructed environment
期刊最新文献
Enhanced sequential directional importance sampling for structural reliability analysis Time-dependent reliability analysis for non-differentiable limit state functions due to discrete load processes Editorial Board Serviceability limit state target reliability for concrete structures Wind fragility modeling of transmission tower-line system based on threat-dependent structural robustness index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1