Emergency Nurses’ Recognition of and Perception of Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptoms

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2023.11.005
John R. Blakeman PhD, RN, PCCN-K, Jessica K. Zègre-Hemsey PhD, RN, FAHA, Sahereh Mirzaei PhD, RN, MyoungJin Kim PhD, Ann L. Eckhardt PhD, RN, Holli A. DeVon PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN
{"title":"Emergency Nurses’ Recognition of and Perception of Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptoms","authors":"John R. Blakeman PhD, RN, PCCN-K,&nbsp;Jessica K. Zègre-Hemsey PhD, RN, FAHA,&nbsp;Sahereh Mirzaei PhD, RN,&nbsp;MyoungJin Kim PhD,&nbsp;Ann L. Eckhardt PhD, RN,&nbsp;Holli A. DeVon PhD, RN, FAHA, FAAN","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2023.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Emergency nurses must quickly identify patients with potential acute coronary syndrome. However, no recent nationwide research has explored nurses’ knowledge of acute coronary syndrome symptoms. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses’ recognition of acute coronary syndrome symptoms, including whether nurses attribute different symptoms to women and men.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a cross-sectional, descriptive design using an online survey. Emergency nurses from across the United States were recruited using postcards and a posting on the Emergency Nurses Association website. Demographic data and participants’ recognition of acute coronary syndrome symptoms, using the Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptom Checklist, were collected. Descriptive statistics and ordinal regression were used to analyze the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The final sample included 448 emergency nurses with a median 7.0 years of emergency nursing experience. Participants were overwhelmingly able to recognize common acute coronary syndrome symptoms, although some symptoms were more often associated with women or with men. Most participants believed that women and men’s symptoms were either “slightly different” (41.1%) or “fairly different” (42.6%). Nurses who completed training for the triage role were significantly less likely to believe that men and women have substantially different symptoms (odds ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.25-0.87).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Emergency nurses were able to recognize common acute coronary syndrome symptoms, but some reported believing that the symptom experience of men and women is more divergent than what is reported in the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176723003094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Emergency nurses must quickly identify patients with potential acute coronary syndrome. However, no recent nationwide research has explored nurses’ knowledge of acute coronary syndrome symptoms. The purpose of this study was to explore emergency nurses’ recognition of acute coronary syndrome symptoms, including whether nurses attribute different symptoms to women and men.

Methods

We used a cross-sectional, descriptive design using an online survey. Emergency nurses from across the United States were recruited using postcards and a posting on the Emergency Nurses Association website. Demographic data and participants’ recognition of acute coronary syndrome symptoms, using the Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptom Checklist, were collected. Descriptive statistics and ordinal regression were used to analyze the data.

Results

The final sample included 448 emergency nurses with a median 7.0 years of emergency nursing experience. Participants were overwhelmingly able to recognize common acute coronary syndrome symptoms, although some symptoms were more often associated with women or with men. Most participants believed that women and men’s symptoms were either “slightly different” (41.1%) or “fairly different” (42.6%). Nurses who completed training for the triage role were significantly less likely to believe that men and women have substantially different symptoms (odds ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.25-0.87).

Discussion

Emergency nurses were able to recognize common acute coronary syndrome symptoms, but some reported believing that the symptom experience of men and women is more divergent than what is reported in the literature.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊护士对急性冠状动脉综合征症状性别差异的认识和感知
导言急诊护士必须快速识别可能患有急性冠状动脉综合征的患者。然而,最近还没有全国性的研究探讨过护士对急性冠状动脉综合征症状的认识。本研究旨在探讨急诊护士对急性冠状动脉综合征症状的认识,包括护士是否对女性和男性的症状有不同的认识。我们通过明信片和急诊护士协会网站上的帖子招募了美国各地的急诊护士。调查使用急性冠状动脉综合征症状核对表收集了人口统计学数据和参与者对急性冠状动脉综合征症状的认识。结果最终样本包括 448 名急诊护士,中位数为 7.0 年急诊护理经验。绝大多数参与者都能识别常见的急性冠状动脉综合征症状,但有些症状更常见于女性或男性。大多数参与者认为女性和男性的症状 "略有不同"(41.1%)或 "相当不同"(42.6%)。讨论急诊护士能够识别常见的急性冠状动脉综合征症状,但有些人认为男性和女性的症状经历比文献报道的更不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Frailty Scales in Emergency Department: Highlighting the Strengths of the Triage Frailty and Comorbidity Tool. An Analysis of Psychological Capital and Influencing Factors Among Disaster Care Reservists. Uncovering the Driving Forces of Emergency Nurses' Retention: Findings From a Grounded Theory Study. Emergency Management and Nursing Considerations of Carotid Blowout Syndrome. An Introduction to the Semantics and Statistics Behind the Firearm Policy Debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1