A self-paced reading study of context effects in the processing of aspectual verbs in Mandarin

IF 1.1 3区 心理学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language and Cognition Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1017/langcog.2023.57
Ye Ma, Brian Buccola, Shannon Cousins, Alan Beretta
{"title":"A self-paced reading study of context effects in the processing of aspectual verbs in Mandarin","authors":"Ye Ma, Brian Buccola, Shannon Cousins, Alan Beretta","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2023.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in the past few years has investigated the semantic complexity of expressions with aspectual verbs followed by entity-denoting complements such as <jats:italic>finish the book</jats:italic> that led to processing costs cross-linguistically. The Structured Individual Hypothesis (SIH) proposes that aspectual verbs lexically encode a function whose value (dimension) must be resolved. This ambiguity resolution is hypothesized to occur at the verb’s complement, where a specific dimension is selected based on context (Piñango &amp; Deo, 2016). In light of the critical role of the context in SIH, recent research (Lai et al., 2023; Lai &amp; Piñango, 2019) has investigated how the interpretations of sentences with aspectual verbs were affected by biased contexts in an offline sentence acceptability judgment study and an online eye-tracking study. However, results of the two studies showed that biased contexts disambiguated the interpretations of aspectual verb expressions offline while processing costs in biased contexts were not found to attenuate costs in real time. The reason why conflicting results were found offline versus online and the timecourse of context effects remain unclear, but in our view it may be due to pragmatic contexts, i.e., descriptions of the utterance context used to infer the salient reading of the utterance. We used <jats:italic>grammatical</jats:italic> contexts – two classes of adverbs – in a self-paced reading study to examine context effects for sentences with aspectual verbs in Mandarin. We found that biased grammatical contexts not only affected the interpretations in the offline task, but crucially facilitated processing in the online experiment as well. We conclude that biased grammatical contexts predetermine the interpretations of aspectual verb expressions immediately in real time.","PeriodicalId":45880,"journal":{"name":"Language and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2023.57","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research in the past few years has investigated the semantic complexity of expressions with aspectual verbs followed by entity-denoting complements such as finish the book that led to processing costs cross-linguistically. The Structured Individual Hypothesis (SIH) proposes that aspectual verbs lexically encode a function whose value (dimension) must be resolved. This ambiguity resolution is hypothesized to occur at the verb’s complement, where a specific dimension is selected based on context (Piñango & Deo, 2016). In light of the critical role of the context in SIH, recent research (Lai et al., 2023; Lai & Piñango, 2019) has investigated how the interpretations of sentences with aspectual verbs were affected by biased contexts in an offline sentence acceptability judgment study and an online eye-tracking study. However, results of the two studies showed that biased contexts disambiguated the interpretations of aspectual verb expressions offline while processing costs in biased contexts were not found to attenuate costs in real time. The reason why conflicting results were found offline versus online and the timecourse of context effects remain unclear, but in our view it may be due to pragmatic contexts, i.e., descriptions of the utterance context used to infer the salient reading of the utterance. We used grammatical contexts – two classes of adverbs – in a self-paced reading study to examine context effects for sentences with aspectual verbs in Mandarin. We found that biased grammatical contexts not only affected the interpretations in the offline task, but crucially facilitated processing in the online experiment as well. We conclude that biased grammatical contexts predetermine the interpretations of aspectual verb expressions immediately in real time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于普通话方面动词加工过程中语境效应的自定进度阅读研究
过去几年的研究对带有方面动词的表达式的语义复杂性进行了调查,这些表达式后面跟有实体表示的补语,如 "把书看完"(finish the book),这导致了跨语言的处理成本。结构化个体假说(SIH)提出,方面动词在词法上编码一个功能,其值(维度)必须得到解决。这种模棱两可的解决假设发生在动词的补语中,在补语中根据语境选择特定的维度(Piñango & Deo, 2016)。鉴于语境在 SIH 中的关键作用,最近的研究(Lai et al.,2023;Lai & Piñango,2019)在离线句子可接受性判断研究和在线眼动跟踪研究中调查了带有方面动词的句子的解释如何受到偏向语境的影响。然而,这两项研究的结果表明,偏误语境会消解线下对方面动词表达的解释,而偏误语境中的处理成本却没有发现会减弱实时成本。线下与线上的结果相互矛盾的原因以及语境效应的时间过程仍不清楚,但我们认为这可能是语用语境造成的,即用于推断语篇突出解读的语篇语境描述。我们在一项自定进度的阅读研究中使用了语法语境--两类副词--来考察普通话中带有方面动词的句子的语境效应。我们发现,有倾向性的语法语境不仅影响离线任务中的解释,而且在在线实验中也促进了句子的处理。我们的结论是,有偏向的语法语境会实时预先决定对方面动词表达的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Multimodal training on L2 Japanese pitch accent: learning outcomes, neural correlates and subjective assessments Head metonymies and metaphors in Jordanian and Tunisian Arabic: an extended conceptual metaphor theory perspective Facial expressions in different communication settings: A case of whispering and speaking with a face mask in Farsi The effect of emotional prosody and referent characteristics on novel noun learning Inherent linguistic preference outcompetes incidental alignment in cooperative partner choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1