{"title":"Disparities in catastrophic health expenditure for hospitalization in Urban Kerala, India: Evidence from 75th round of the National Sample Survey","authors":"Paul J. Philip, Gyana R. Panda","doi":"10.1002/wmh3.597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing literature suggests significant disparities in health expenditure incurred by households receiving health services. To determine fair contributions by beneficiaries, it is crucial to understand the existing inequalities in the context of financial protection measures and the factors influencing them. This exploratory study looks at how catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) are distributed across economic groups. The study also casts light on what drives the inequalities in the incidences of CHE. The study uses unit-level data from the 75th round of the National Sample Survey fielded periodically by the Government of India. It employs logistic regression to study factors affecting CHE. Furthermore, the concentration index and its regression-based decomposition are employed to have a sense of inequality and the factors driving it. The findings reveal socioeconomic inequality in CHE incidence and highlight the contribution of medical institutions (whether public or private) and consumption expenditure of households to the total inequality. The present study, while critically looking at the pre-existing inequalities, highlights the shortcomings of health financing in urban areas and calls for a reconsideration of extant policy designs. The study maintains that factors outside the control of the health system may be responsible for disparities in catastrophic medical spending. Therefore, to reduce the burden of catastrophic health spending and its inequalities, future policy measures must take into account both elements within the health system and those outside of it.","PeriodicalId":44943,"journal":{"name":"World Medical & Health Policy","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Medical & Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Existing literature suggests significant disparities in health expenditure incurred by households receiving health services. To determine fair contributions by beneficiaries, it is crucial to understand the existing inequalities in the context of financial protection measures and the factors influencing them. This exploratory study looks at how catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) are distributed across economic groups. The study also casts light on what drives the inequalities in the incidences of CHE. The study uses unit-level data from the 75th round of the National Sample Survey fielded periodically by the Government of India. It employs logistic regression to study factors affecting CHE. Furthermore, the concentration index and its regression-based decomposition are employed to have a sense of inequality and the factors driving it. The findings reveal socioeconomic inequality in CHE incidence and highlight the contribution of medical institutions (whether public or private) and consumption expenditure of households to the total inequality. The present study, while critically looking at the pre-existing inequalities, highlights the shortcomings of health financing in urban areas and calls for a reconsideration of extant policy designs. The study maintains that factors outside the control of the health system may be responsible for disparities in catastrophic medical spending. Therefore, to reduce the burden of catastrophic health spending and its inequalities, future policy measures must take into account both elements within the health system and those outside of it.
现有文献表明,接受医疗服务的家庭在医疗支出方面存在巨大差异。要确定受益人的公平缴费,关键是要了解财政保护措施背景下现有的不平等现象及其影响因素。这项探索性研究探讨了灾难性医疗支出(CHE)在不同经济群体中的分布情况。研究还揭示了导致灾难性医疗支出发生率不平等的原因。研究使用了印度政府定期开展的第 75 轮全国抽样调查中的单位层面数据。它采用逻辑回归法研究影响 CHE 的因素。此外,研究还采用了集中指数及其基于回归的分解方法,以了解不平等现象及其驱动因素。研究结果揭示了 CHE 发病率中的社会经济不平等现象,并强调了医疗机构(无论是公立还是私立)和家庭消费支出对总体不平等现象的贡献。本研究在批判性地审视原有的不平等现象的同时,强调了城市地区医疗融资的缺陷,并呼吁重新考虑现有的政策设计。本研究认为,卫生系统无法控制的因素可能是造成灾难性医疗支出差异的原因。因此,为了减轻灾难性医疗支出的负担及其不平等,未来的政策措施必须考虑到卫生系统内部和外部的因素。