Primary–secondary school transition experiences and factors associated with differences in these experiences: Analysis of the longitudinal Growing Up in Scotland dataset

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Education Pub Date : 2023-12-08 DOI:10.1002/rev3.3444
Divya Jindal-Snape, Paul Bradshaw, Adam Gilbert, Neil Smith, Line Knudsen
{"title":"Primary–secondary school transition experiences and factors associated with differences in these experiences: Analysis of the longitudinal Growing Up in Scotland dataset","authors":"Divya Jindal-Snape, Paul Bradshaw, Adam Gilbert, Neil Smith, Line Knudsen","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research suggests that primary–secondary school transitions can be problematic, with some children experiencing a negative impact on academic outcomes and a decline in wellbeing. The negative impact of primary–secondary transition experiences can be long term and lead to young people not completing high school with implications for their subsequent education and employment. However, there are several gaps in existing studies as a result of weak research designs, small samples and the timing of data collection. To better understand children's primary–secondary school transition experiences and the factors which may impact on them, we undertook secondary analysis of data from the Growing Up in Scotland (GUS) study. The analysis focused on data collected when children were in the penultimate year of primary school (Primary 6/P6) and then when they were in the first year of secondary school (Secondary 1/S1). This led to a final sample size of 2559 children and their parents. Results contradict many previous studies which tend to find primary–secondary transitions as overwhelmingly negative. In contrast, we found that 36% of children experienced a positive transition and 42% a moderately positive transition, with only 22% children experiencing a negative transition. This is the first large-scale, longitudinal and contemporaneous study able to provide a clear proportion of children with positive, moderate and negative transition experiences. Several factors seemed to play a part in children's transition experiences, namely gender, religion, household composition, socioeconomic status, child expectations, schoolwork, and relationships. Implications and recommendations for research, policy and practice have been outlined.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research suggests that primary–secondary school transitions can be problematic, with some children experiencing a negative impact on academic outcomes and a decline in wellbeing. The negative impact of primary–secondary transition experiences can be long term and lead to young people not completing high school with implications for their subsequent education and employment. However, there are several gaps in existing studies as a result of weak research designs, small samples and the timing of data collection. To better understand children's primary–secondary school transition experiences and the factors which may impact on them, we undertook secondary analysis of data from the Growing Up in Scotland (GUS) study. The analysis focused on data collected when children were in the penultimate year of primary school (Primary 6/P6) and then when they were in the first year of secondary school (Secondary 1/S1). This led to a final sample size of 2559 children and their parents. Results contradict many previous studies which tend to find primary–secondary transitions as overwhelmingly negative. In contrast, we found that 36% of children experienced a positive transition and 42% a moderately positive transition, with only 22% children experiencing a negative transition. This is the first large-scale, longitudinal and contemporaneous study able to provide a clear proportion of children with positive, moderate and negative transition experiences. Several factors seemed to play a part in children's transition experiences, namely gender, religion, household composition, socioeconomic status, child expectations, schoolwork, and relationships. Implications and recommendations for research, policy and practice have been outlined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学-中学过渡经历以及与这些经历差异相关的因素:苏格兰成长纵向数据集分析
以往的研究表明,小学到中学的过渡可能会产生问题,一些儿童的学习成绩会受到负面影响,幸福感也会下降。小学-中学过渡经历的负面影响可能是长期的,会导致青少年无法完成高中学业,从而影响他们以后的教育和就业。然而,由于研究设计薄弱、样本较少以及数据收集的时间安排等原因,现有研究还存在一些不足。为了更好地了解儿童的小学-中学过渡经历以及可能对其产生影响的因素,我们对 "苏格兰成长"(GUS)研究的数据进行了二次分析。分析的重点是儿童在小学倒数第二学年(小学 6 年级/P6)和中学一年级(中学 1 年级/S1)时收集的数据。因此,最终样本容量为 2559 名儿童及其家长。研究结果与以往的许多研究相矛盾,因为以往的研究往往认为小学到中学的过渡是非常消极的。相反,我们发现 36% 的儿童经历了积极的过渡,42% 的儿童经历了中度积极的过渡,只有 22% 的儿童经历了消极的过渡。这是第一项大规模、纵向和同期研究,能够提供具有积极、中度和消极过渡经历的儿童的明确比例。儿童的过渡经历似乎与几个因素有关,即性别、宗教、家庭组成、社会经济地位、儿童期望、学校功课和人际关系。概述了研究、政策和实践的意义和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Education
Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
The status of culturally relevant teacher education in the European context: A systematic review of research Effectiveness of language‐sensitive subject teaching: Heterogeneity and quality of the evidence and implications for future research Evaluation of the effectiveness of critical thinking training on critical thinking skills and academic achievement by using mixed‐meta method Research on teachers of colour and minoritised teachers in majoritarian education systems: A scoping review of the literature in the last two decades Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1