Variations of the Kjeldahl method for assessing nitrogen concentration in tropical forages

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Grass and Forage Science Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1111/gfs.12641
Daiana Francisca Quirino, Nicole Stephane Abreu Lima, Malber Nathan Nobre Palma, Marcia de Oliveira Franco, Edenio Detmann
{"title":"Variations of the Kjeldahl method for assessing nitrogen concentration in tropical forages","authors":"Daiana Francisca Quirino,&nbsp;Nicole Stephane Abreu Lima,&nbsp;Malber Nathan Nobre Palma,&nbsp;Marcia de Oliveira Franco,&nbsp;Edenio Detmann","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nitrogen (N) is one of the most important components of feeds and its quantification allows estimating protein equivalents, an important characteristic for diet formulation in ruminant nutrition. We aimed to evaluate N recovery in tropical forages using the Kjeldahl method with modifications involving a pre-digestion step with salicylic acid and, or a partial replacement of copper sulfate by titanium dioxide as a catalyst. Forty-eight study materials (i.e., tropical forages) were evaluated. Kjeldahl standard procedure was based on acid digestion with sodium sulfate and copper sulfate (20:1), followed by steam distillation in sodium hydroxide and titration with hydrochloric acid. The Kjeldahl variations were: salicylic acid as pre-treatment before digestion, titanium dioxide replacing 50% of copper sulfate as catalyst in the digestion mixture, and salicylic acid and titanium as described above. The Dumas method was used as standard method to verify N recovery through Kjeldahl procedures. The N concentrations of the study materials (Dumas method) ranged from 1.9 to 28.3 g/kg as-is. We found that all the methods were strongly and positively associated with each other (<i>p</i> &lt; .01). All Kjeldahl methods produced N concentrations different from those obtained by the Dumas method (<i>p</i> &lt; .01). The N recovery ranged from 0.971 to 0.980 for the different Kjeldahl methods. However, we did not find any difference between the different Kjeldahl methods regarding N concentrations (<i>p</i>≥ .89). The N recovery of the Kjeldahl method is not influenced by a pre-digestion with salicylic acid or by the partial replacement of copper sulfate with titanium dioxide as a catalyst.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"78 4","pages":"648-654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12641","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is one of the most important components of feeds and its quantification allows estimating protein equivalents, an important characteristic for diet formulation in ruminant nutrition. We aimed to evaluate N recovery in tropical forages using the Kjeldahl method with modifications involving a pre-digestion step with salicylic acid and, or a partial replacement of copper sulfate by titanium dioxide as a catalyst. Forty-eight study materials (i.e., tropical forages) were evaluated. Kjeldahl standard procedure was based on acid digestion with sodium sulfate and copper sulfate (20:1), followed by steam distillation in sodium hydroxide and titration with hydrochloric acid. The Kjeldahl variations were: salicylic acid as pre-treatment before digestion, titanium dioxide replacing 50% of copper sulfate as catalyst in the digestion mixture, and salicylic acid and titanium as described above. The Dumas method was used as standard method to verify N recovery through Kjeldahl procedures. The N concentrations of the study materials (Dumas method) ranged from 1.9 to 28.3 g/kg as-is. We found that all the methods were strongly and positively associated with each other (p < .01). All Kjeldahl methods produced N concentrations different from those obtained by the Dumas method (p < .01). The N recovery ranged from 0.971 to 0.980 for the different Kjeldahl methods. However, we did not find any difference between the different Kjeldahl methods regarding N concentrations (p≥ .89). The N recovery of the Kjeldahl method is not influenced by a pre-digestion with salicylic acid or by the partial replacement of copper sulfate with titanium dioxide as a catalyst.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估热带牧草氮浓度的凯氏定氮法的变化
氮(N)是饲料中最重要的成分之一,对氮(N)进行量化可以估算蛋白质当量,这是反刍动物营养日粮配方的一个重要特征。我们的目标是使用凯氏定氮法评估热带牧草中氮的回收率,并对该方法进行修改,包括使用水杨酸进行预消化,或用二氧化钛作为催化剂部分替代硫酸铜。对 48 种研究材料(即热带牧草)进行了评估。凯氏定氮标准程序是用硫酸钠和硫酸铜(20:1)进行酸消化,然后在氢氧化钠中蒸馏,再用盐酸滴定。凯氏定氮法的变化是:水杨酸作为消化前的预处理,二氧化钛取代 50%的硫酸铜作为消化混合物的催化剂,水杨酸和钛如上所述。采用杜马斯法作为标准方法来验证凯氏定氮法的氮回收率。研究材料的氮浓度(杜马斯法)介于 1.9 至 28.3 克/千克之间。我们发现,所有方法之间都有很强的正相关性(p <.01)。所有凯氏定氮法得出的氮浓度都不同于杜马斯定氮法(p <.01)。不同凯氏定氮法的氮回收率从 0.971 到 0.980 不等。然而,我们没有发现不同凯氏定氮法在氮浓度方面有任何差异(p≥ .89)。凯氏定氮法的氮回收率不受水杨酸预消化或用二氧化钛部分取代硫酸铜作为催化剂的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial Sward Species Diversity Impacts on Pasture Productivity and Botanical Composition Under Grazing Systems Survival of 13 Forage Legumes in Contrasting Environments of Central Otago, New Zealand Editorial: Special issue on green biorefining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1