Single-lead ECG AI model with risk factors detects Atrial Fibrillation during Sinus Rhythm

Stijn Dupulthys, Karl Dujardin, Wim Anné, Peter Pollet, Maarten Vanhaverbeke, David McAuliffe, Pieter-Jan Lammertyn, Louise Berteloot, Nathalie Mertens, Peter De Jaeger
{"title":"Single-lead ECG AI model with risk factors detects Atrial Fibrillation during Sinus Rhythm","authors":"Stijn Dupulthys, Karl Dujardin, Wim Anné, Peter Pollet, Maarten Vanhaverbeke, David McAuliffe, Pieter-Jan Lammertyn, Louise Berteloot, Nathalie Mertens, Peter De Jaeger","doi":"10.1093/europace/euad354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims Guidelines recommend opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation (AF), using a 30-second single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded by a wearable device. Since many patients have paroxysmal AF, identification of patients at high risk presenting in sinus rhythm may increase the yield of subsequent long-term cardiac monitoring. The aim is evaluating an AI-algorithm trained on 10-second single-lead ECG with or without risk factors to predict AF. Methods This retrospective study used 13479 ECGs from AF-patients in sinus rhythm around time of diagnosis and 53916 age- and sex-matched control ECGs, augmented with seventeen risk factors extracted from electronic health records. AI models were trained and compared using one- or twelve-lead ECGs, with or without risk factors. Model bias was evaluated by age- and sex-stratification of results. Random forest models identified the most relevant risk factors. Results The single-lead model achieved an AUC of 0.74, which increased to 0.76 by adding six risk factors (95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.79). This model matched the performance of a twelve-lead model. Results are stable for both sexes, over ages ranging from 40 to 90 years. Out of seventeen clinical variables, six were sufficient for optimal accuracy of the model: hypertension, heart failure, valvular disease, history of myocardial infarction, age and sex. Conclusions An AI model using a single-lead sinus rhythm ECG and six risk factors can identify patients with concurrent AF with similar accuracy as a 12-lead ECG-AI model. An age- and sex matched dataset leads to an unbiased model with consistent predictions across age groups.","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims Guidelines recommend opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation (AF), using a 30-second single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded by a wearable device. Since many patients have paroxysmal AF, identification of patients at high risk presenting in sinus rhythm may increase the yield of subsequent long-term cardiac monitoring. The aim is evaluating an AI-algorithm trained on 10-second single-lead ECG with or without risk factors to predict AF. Methods This retrospective study used 13479 ECGs from AF-patients in sinus rhythm around time of diagnosis and 53916 age- and sex-matched control ECGs, augmented with seventeen risk factors extracted from electronic health records. AI models were trained and compared using one- or twelve-lead ECGs, with or without risk factors. Model bias was evaluated by age- and sex-stratification of results. Random forest models identified the most relevant risk factors. Results The single-lead model achieved an AUC of 0.74, which increased to 0.76 by adding six risk factors (95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.79). This model matched the performance of a twelve-lead model. Results are stable for both sexes, over ages ranging from 40 to 90 years. Out of seventeen clinical variables, six were sufficient for optimal accuracy of the model: hypertension, heart failure, valvular disease, history of myocardial infarction, age and sex. Conclusions An AI model using a single-lead sinus rhythm ECG and six risk factors can identify patients with concurrent AF with similar accuracy as a 12-lead ECG-AI model. An age- and sex matched dataset leads to an unbiased model with consistent predictions across age groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含风险因素的单导联心电图人工智能模型可检测出窦性心律期间的心房颤动
背景和目的 指南建议使用可穿戴设备记录的 30 秒单导联心电图(ECG)对心房颤动(AF)进行机会性筛查。由于许多患者都有阵发性房颤,因此识别窦性心律的高危患者可提高后续长期心脏监测的收益。我们的目的是评估在有或无风险因素的 10 秒单导联心电图上训练的人工智能算法,以预测房颤。方法 这项回顾性研究使用了 13479 份房颤患者在确诊时的窦性心律心电图和 53916 份年龄和性别匹配的对照心电图,并增加了从电子健康记录中提取的 17 个风险因素。人工智能模型使用单导联或十二导联心电图进行了训练和比较,无论有无风险因素。通过对结果进行年龄和性别分层来评估模型偏差。随机森林模型确定了最相关的风险因素。结果 单导联模型的AUC为0.74,增加六个风险因素后AUC增至0.76(95%置信区间:0.74-0.79)。该模型与十二导联模型的性能相当。在 40 至 90 岁的年龄段中,男女的结果都很稳定。在 17 个临床变量中,有 6 个足以使模型达到最佳准确度:高血压、心力衰竭、瓣膜疾病、心肌梗死病史、年龄和性别。结论 使用单导联窦性心律心电图和六个风险因素的人工智能模型可以识别并发房颤患者,其准确性与 12 导联心电图-人工智能模型相似。年龄和性别匹配的数据集可生成一个无偏的模型,对不同年龄组的预测结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High lead-related complication rate with MicroPort Vega active fixation pacing leads. Dual chamber versus single chamber pacemaker in patients in sinus rhythm with an atrioventricular block: a nationwide cohort study Ventricular Arrhythmias in Acute Heart Failure. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care Association (ACVC), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC Enhancing Origin Prediction: Deep Learning Model for Diagnosing Premature Ventricular Contractions with Dual-Rhythm Analysis Focused on Cardiac Rotation A computational study on the influence of antegrade accessory pathway location on the 12-lead electrocardiogram in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1