Effectiveness of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in a simulation model with indirect and informal contact tracing

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Epidemics Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100735
Ka Yin Leung , Esther Metting , Wolfgang Ebbers , Irene Veldhuijzen , Stijn P. Andeweg , Guus Luijben , Marijn de Bruin , Jacco Wallinga , Don Klinkenberg
{"title":"Effectiveness of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in a simulation model with indirect and informal contact tracing","authors":"Ka Yin Leung ,&nbsp;Esther Metting ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Ebbers ,&nbsp;Irene Veldhuijzen ,&nbsp;Stijn P. Andeweg ,&nbsp;Guus Luijben ,&nbsp;Marijn de Bruin ,&nbsp;Jacco Wallinga ,&nbsp;Don Klinkenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, contact tracing was used to identify individuals who had been in contact with a confirmed case so that these contacted individuals could be tested and quarantined to prevent further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Many countries developed mobile apps to find these contacted individuals faster. We evaluate the epidemiological effectiveness of the Dutch app CoronaMelder, where we measure effectiveness as the reduction of the reproduction number R. To this end, we use a simulation model of SARS-CoV-2 spread and contact tracing, informed by data collected during the study period (December 2020 - March 2021) in the Netherlands. We show that the tracing app caused a clear but small reduction of the reproduction number, and the magnitude of the effect was found to be robust in sensitivity analyses. The app could have been more effective if more people had used it, and if notification of contacts could have been done directly by the user and thus reducing the time intervals between symptom onset and reporting of contacts. The model has two innovative aspects: i) it accounts for the clustered nature of social networks and ii) cases can alert their contacts informally without involvement of health authorities or the tracing app.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49206,"journal":{"name":"Epidemics","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100735"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436523000713/pdfft?md5=4d5245534a992cfda8d09f20498b1a01&pid=1-s2.0-S1755436523000713-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436523000713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, contact tracing was used to identify individuals who had been in contact with a confirmed case so that these contacted individuals could be tested and quarantined to prevent further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Many countries developed mobile apps to find these contacted individuals faster. We evaluate the epidemiological effectiveness of the Dutch app CoronaMelder, where we measure effectiveness as the reduction of the reproduction number R. To this end, we use a simulation model of SARS-CoV-2 spread and contact tracing, informed by data collected during the study period (December 2020 - March 2021) in the Netherlands. We show that the tracing app caused a clear but small reduction of the reproduction number, and the magnitude of the effect was found to be robust in sensitivity analyses. The app could have been more effective if more people had used it, and if notification of contacts could have been done directly by the user and thus reducing the time intervals between symptom onset and reporting of contacts. The model has two innovative aspects: i) it accounts for the clustered nature of social networks and ii) cases can alert their contacts informally without involvement of health authorities or the tracing app.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序在间接和非正式接触者追踪模拟模型中的有效性
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,接触者追踪被用来识别与确诊病例有过接触的人,以便对这些接触者进行检测和隔离,防止 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的进一步传播。许多国家开发了移动应用程序,以便更快地找到这些接触者。为此,我们使用了 SARS-CoV-2 传播和接触者追踪的模拟模型,并参考了研究期间(2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 3 月)在荷兰收集的数据。我们的研究表明,追踪应用程序明显但很小地减少了繁殖数量,而且在敏感性分析中发现效果的大小是稳健的。如果有更多的人使用该应用程序,如果用户可以直接通知接触者,从而缩短症状出现与报告接触者之间的时间间隔,那么该应用程序的效果可能会更好。该模型有两个创新之处:i) 它考虑到了社交网络的集群性质;ii) 病例可以在没有卫生当局或追踪应用程序参与的情况下非正式地通知其联系人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemics
Epidemics INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
92
审稿时长
140 days
期刊介绍: Epidemics publishes papers on infectious disease dynamics in the broadest sense. Its scope covers both within-host dynamics of infectious agents and dynamics at the population level, particularly the interaction between the two. Areas of emphasis include: spread, transmission, persistence, implications and population dynamics of infectious diseases; population and public health as well as policy aspects of control and prevention; dynamics at the individual level; interaction with the environment, ecology and evolution of infectious diseases, as well as population genetics of infectious agents.
期刊最新文献
Forecasting SARS-CoV-2 epidemic dynamic in Poland with the pDyn agent-based model Optimizing spatial distribution of wastewater-based epidemiology to advance health equity Building in-house capabilities in health agencies and outsourcing to academia or industry: Considerations for effective infectious disease modelling. Direct and indirect effects of hepatitis B vaccination in four low- and middle-income countries Modelling plausible scenarios for the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant from early-stage surveillance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1