Cognitive screening and rehabilitation after cardiac arrest: only a few hurdles to take

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Netherlands Heart Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1007/s12471-023-01838-4
Janine A. van Til, Martin E. W. Hemels, Jeannette Hofmeijer
{"title":"Cognitive screening and rehabilitation after cardiac arrest: only a few hurdles to take","authors":"Janine A. van Til, Martin E. W. Hemels, Jeannette Hofmeijer","doi":"10.1007/s12471-023-01838-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dutch and European guidelines recommend systematic screening for cognitive and emotional impairments in cardiac arrest survivors. We aimed to clarify opinions on cognitive screening and rehabilitation, identify barriers and facilitators for implementation in the Netherlands, and arrive at recommendations in this field. We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with various stakeholders using the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases checklist. There is broad-based acknowledgement of the relevance of cognitive impairment and a positive attitude regarding early cognitive screening among health professionals and patients. Barriers to implementation include a lack of practical recommendations on how, where and when to screen, insufficient knowledge of cognitive consequences of cardiac arrest, insufficient collaboration and knowledge sharing among different specialties within hospitals, insufficient resources, and insufficient evidence of the effectiveness of screening and therapy to justify financial compensation. Most of the identified barriers to implementation are solvable: national guidelines need practical recommendations and knowledge gaps among healthcare workers can be bridged by in-hospital collaboration. Fulfilling these requirements should be sufficient for the implementation of simple screening and tailored advice. More extensive cognitive rehabilitation therapy needs stronger evidence of efficacy in order to warrant stronger guideline recommendations and financial reimbursement.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01838-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dutch and European guidelines recommend systematic screening for cognitive and emotional impairments in cardiac arrest survivors. We aimed to clarify opinions on cognitive screening and rehabilitation, identify barriers and facilitators for implementation in the Netherlands, and arrive at recommendations in this field. We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with various stakeholders using the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases checklist. There is broad-based acknowledgement of the relevance of cognitive impairment and a positive attitude regarding early cognitive screening among health professionals and patients. Barriers to implementation include a lack of practical recommendations on how, where and when to screen, insufficient knowledge of cognitive consequences of cardiac arrest, insufficient collaboration and knowledge sharing among different specialties within hospitals, insufficient resources, and insufficient evidence of the effectiveness of screening and therapy to justify financial compensation. Most of the identified barriers to implementation are solvable: national guidelines need practical recommendations and knowledge gaps among healthcare workers can be bridged by in-hospital collaboration. Fulfilling these requirements should be sufficient for the implementation of simple screening and tailored advice. More extensive cognitive rehabilitation therapy needs stronger evidence of efficacy in order to warrant stronger guideline recommendations and financial reimbursement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏骤停后的认知筛查和康复:只需跨越几道障碍
荷兰和欧洲的指南建议对心脏骤停幸存者的认知和情感障碍进行系统筛查。我们的目的是澄清对认知筛查和康复的看法,确定在荷兰实施的障碍和促进因素,并在此领域提出建议。我们使用 "慢性病量身定制实施清单 "对不同的利益相关者进行了 22 次半结构式访谈。认知障碍的相关性得到了广泛认可,医疗专业人员和患者对早期认知筛查持积极态度。实施的障碍包括:缺乏关于如何筛查、在何处筛查和何时筛查的实用建议;对心脏骤停的认知后果了解不足;医院内不同专科之间的合作和知识共享不足;资源不足;没有足够的证据证明筛查和治疗的有效性,因此无法提供经济补偿。大部分已确定的实施障碍都是可以解决的:国家指南需要切实可行的建议,医护人员之间的知识差距可以通过院内合作来弥补。满足这些要求就足以实施简单的筛查和有针对性的建议。更广泛的认知康复治疗需要更有力的疗效证据,以便获得更有力的指南建议和经济补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Netherlands Heart Journal
Netherlands Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the Netherlands Heart Journal is to contribute to the national and international literature by publishing scientific papers in the field of cardiovascular medicine. It also provides a platform for Continuing Medical Education for cardiologists and those in training for the speciality of cardiology in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Heart Journal is made available to cardiologists, cardiologists in training, cardiopulmonary surgeons, cardiopulmonary surgeons in training, internists and paediatric cardiologists. The journal is the official journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness of long term left ventricular assist devices. Reply to 'Cost-effectiveness of long term left ventricular assist devices'. The effects of spondylodiscitis on the inflammation burden in infective endocarditis. Growth rates in non-syndromic aneurysms of the ascending aorta: a systematic review. Advancing cardiovascular care-key insights from the Netherlands Heart Journal 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1