Dietary assessment methods for measurement of oral intake in acute care and critically ill hospitalized patients: a scoping review

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition Research Reviews Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1017/s0954422423000288
Clare E Ferguson, Oana A Tatucu-Babet, Jenna N Amon, Lee-anne S Chapple, Lauren Malacria, Ivy Myint Htoo, Carol L Hodgson, Emma J Ridley
{"title":"Dietary assessment methods for measurement of oral intake in acute care and critically ill hospitalized patients: a scoping review","authors":"Clare E Ferguson, Oana A Tatucu-Babet, Jenna N Amon, Lee-anne S Chapple, Lauren Malacria, Ivy Myint Htoo, Carol L Hodgson, Emma J Ridley","doi":"10.1017/s0954422423000288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantification of oral intake within the hospital setting is required to guide nutrition care. Multiple dietary assessment methods are available, yet details regarding their application in the acute care setting are scarce. This scoping review, conducted in accordance with JBI methodology, describes dietary assessment methods used to measure oral intake in acute and critical care hospital patients. The search was run across four databases to identify primary research conducted in adult acute or critical care from 1<jats:sup>st</jats:sup> January 2000-15<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> March 2023 which quantified oral diet with any dietary assessment method. In total, 155 articles were included, predominantly from the acute care setting (n=153, 99%). Studies were mainly single-center (n=138, 88%) and of observational design (n=135, 87%). Estimated plate waste (n=59, 38%) and food records (n=42, 27%) were the most frequent assessment methods with energy and protein the main nutrients quantified (n=81, 52%). Validation was completed in 23 (15%) studies, with the majority of these using a reference method reliant on estimation (n=17, 74%). A quarter of studies (n=39) quantified completion (either as complete versus incomplete or degree of completeness) and four studies (2.5%) explored factors influencing completion. Findings indicate a lack of high-quality evidence to guide selection and application of existing dietary assessment methods to quantify oral intake with a particular absence of evidence in the critical care setting. Further validation of existing tools and identification of factors influencing completion is needed to guide the optimal approach to quantification of oral intake in both research and clinical contexts.","PeriodicalId":54703,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954422423000288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantification of oral intake within the hospital setting is required to guide nutrition care. Multiple dietary assessment methods are available, yet details regarding their application in the acute care setting are scarce. This scoping review, conducted in accordance with JBI methodology, describes dietary assessment methods used to measure oral intake in acute and critical care hospital patients. The search was run across four databases to identify primary research conducted in adult acute or critical care from 1st January 2000-15th March 2023 which quantified oral diet with any dietary assessment method. In total, 155 articles were included, predominantly from the acute care setting (n=153, 99%). Studies were mainly single-center (n=138, 88%) and of observational design (n=135, 87%). Estimated plate waste (n=59, 38%) and food records (n=42, 27%) were the most frequent assessment methods with energy and protein the main nutrients quantified (n=81, 52%). Validation was completed in 23 (15%) studies, with the majority of these using a reference method reliant on estimation (n=17, 74%). A quarter of studies (n=39) quantified completion (either as complete versus incomplete or degree of completeness) and four studies (2.5%) explored factors influencing completion. Findings indicate a lack of high-quality evidence to guide selection and application of existing dietary assessment methods to quantify oral intake with a particular absence of evidence in the critical care setting. Further validation of existing tools and identification of factors influencing completion is needed to guide the optimal approach to quantification of oral intake in both research and clinical contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于测量急症和重症住院病人口腔摄入量的膳食评估方法:范围综述
需要对医院环境中的口腔摄入量进行量化,以指导营养护理。目前有多种膳食评估方法,但有关其在急症护理环境中应用的详细信息却很少。本范围综述根据 JBI 方法进行,介绍了用于测量急症和重症医院患者口腔摄入量的膳食评估方法。我们在四个数据库中进行了检索,以确定 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 15 日期间在成人急症或重症护理中使用任何饮食评估方法量化口腔饮食的主要研究。共纳入 155 篇文章,主要来自急症护理环境(n=153,99%)。研究主要是单中心研究(n=138,88%)和观察性设计(n=135,87%)。估计餐盘浪费(59 人,占 38%)和食物记录(42 人,占 27%)是最常用的评估方法,能量和蛋白质是量化的主要营养素(81 人,占 52%)。有 23 项(15%)研究完成了验证,其中大部分使用的参考方法依赖于估算(17 项,74%)。四分之一的研究(39 项)对完成情况进行了量化(完成与不完成或完成程度),四项研究(2.5%)探讨了影响完成情况的因素。研究结果表明,缺乏高质量的证据来指导选择和应用现有的膳食评估方法来量化口腔摄入量,尤其是在重症监护环境中缺乏证据。需要进一步验证现有工具并确定影响完成度的因素,以指导在研究和临床环境中量化口腔摄入量的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Research Reviews
Nutrition Research Reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
1.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Nutrition Research Reviews offers a comprehensive overview of nutritional science today. By distilling the latest research and linking it to established practice, the journal consistently delivers the widest range of in-depth articles in the field of nutritional science. It presents up-to-date, critical reviews of key topics in nutrition science advancing new concepts and hypotheses that encourage the exchange of fundamental ideas on nutritional well-being in both humans and animals.
期刊最新文献
Military rations: Nutritional, sensorial and technological quality and their effects on military physical exercise in extreme environments. Nutrition and health effects of pectin: A systematic scoping review of human intervention studies. Selenium supplementation in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing haemodialysis: a systematic review of the effects on plasma selenium, antioxidant and inflammatory markers, immunological parameters and thyroid hormones. The influence of zinc levels on osteoarthritis: A comprehensive review. What is the dietary intake and nutritional status of defence members: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1