The impact of Republican CEO ideology and political alignment on R&D spending and business performance

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS R&D Management Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1111/radm.12664
Chiquan Guo, Md Noman Hossain, Mark J. Kroll, Ahmed Elnahas, Brandon Ater
{"title":"The impact of Republican CEO ideology and political alignment on R&D spending and business performance","authors":"Chiquan Guo, Md Noman Hossain, Mark J. Kroll, Ahmed Elnahas, Brandon Ater","doi":"10.1111/radm.12664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a sample of firms in the S&amp;P 1500 index covering the years 1993 to 2016, we find that firms with Republican CEOs spend less on R&amp;D compared to their Democratic counterparts. However, Republican CEOs ratchet up their R&amp;D spending when a Republican is in the Oval Office. Furthermore, we find that R&amp;D spending is negatively related to return on assets (<i>ROA</i>), which is indicative of the risky nature of R&amp;D spending, but R&amp;D is positively related to <i>Tobin Q</i>, a longer-term performance measure. As a consequence, when Republican CEOs manage under a Republican president, the effect of accelerated R&amp;D spending is to send ROA lower, owing to the short-term negative effect of R&amp;D spending. Additionally, due to overspending on R&amp;D by Republican CEOs under a Republican president, the generally positive effect of R&amp;D on <i>Tobin Q</i> is weakened. It seems social capital has its dark side as it can mislead CEOs to make opportunistic but unwise R&amp;D spending decisions. Overall, Republican CEOs, relative to Democratic CEOs, have higher short-term performance (<i>ROA</i>), and lower long-term performance (<i>Tobin Q</i>) owing to reduced R&amp;D spending. Our results have research, managerial, and policy implications.","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"R&D Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12664","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a sample of firms in the S&P 1500 index covering the years 1993 to 2016, we find that firms with Republican CEOs spend less on R&D compared to their Democratic counterparts. However, Republican CEOs ratchet up their R&D spending when a Republican is in the Oval Office. Furthermore, we find that R&D spending is negatively related to return on assets (ROA), which is indicative of the risky nature of R&D spending, but R&D is positively related to Tobin Q, a longer-term performance measure. As a consequence, when Republican CEOs manage under a Republican president, the effect of accelerated R&D spending is to send ROA lower, owing to the short-term negative effect of R&D spending. Additionally, due to overspending on R&D by Republican CEOs under a Republican president, the generally positive effect of R&D on Tobin Q is weakened. It seems social capital has its dark side as it can mislead CEOs to make opportunistic but unwise R&D spending decisions. Overall, Republican CEOs, relative to Democratic CEOs, have higher short-term performance (ROA), and lower long-term performance (Tobin Q) owing to reduced R&D spending. Our results have research, managerial, and policy implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共和党首席执行官的意识形态和政治倾向对研发支出和企业绩效的影响
基于 1993 年至 2016 年 S&P 1500 指数中的公司样本,我们发现,与民主党公司相比,共和党首席执行官所在公司的研发支出较少。然而,当共和党人进入椭圆形办公室时,共和党首席执行官会加大研发支出。此外,我们还发现,研发支出与资产回报率(ROA)呈负相关,这表明研发支出具有风险性,但研发支出与托宾 Q 值(一种长期绩效指标)呈正相关。因此,当共和党首席执行官在共和党总统领导下进行管理时,由于 R&D 支出的短期负面影响,R&D 支出加速的效果是使投资回报率降低。此外,由于共和党总统领导下的共和党首席执行官在 R&D 方面的超额支出,R&D 对托宾 Q 的普遍积极影响被削弱。看来社会资本也有其阴暗面,它可能误导首席执行官做出机会主义但不明智的研发支出决策。总体而言,相对于民主党首席执行官,共和党首席执行官的短期绩效(投资回报率)更高,而长期绩效(托宾 Q 值)则较低,原因是他们减少了研发支出。我们的研究结果具有研究、管理和政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
R&D Management
R&D Management Multiple-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: R&D Management journal publishes articles which address the interests of both practising managers and academic researchers in research and development and innovation management. Covering the full range of topics in research, development, design and innovation, and related strategic and human resource issues - from exploratory science to commercial exploitation - articles also examine social, economic and environmental implications.
期刊最新文献
Roles of big data analytics and organizational culture in developing innovation capabilities: a hybrid PLS‐fsQCA approach Research, patents, and IPO valuation under the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 A Research Agenda for Workplace Innovation: The Challenge of Disruptive Transitions. Edited by Peter R. A.Oeij, StevenDhondt, Adela J.McMurray, Edgar Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2023, 978‐1‐80088‐193‐8, hardback, £115.49, pp. 304. The relationship between digital technologies and the circular economy: a systematic literature review and a research agenda Evolutionary Ideas: Unlocking Ancient Innovation to Solve Tomorrow's Challenges. By SamTatam, Harriman House Publishing: Hampshire, 2022, ISBN 978‐0‐85719‐787‐0, paperback, £9.99, pp. 240.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1