Impact of obstructive sleep apnea on cognition, mood, and fatigue: an MRI-based study

Rania Ahmad Sweed, Rana Alsaeed Rizk Abd Elghany, Anwar Ahmed Elganady, Enas Elsayed Mohamed, Jaidaa Farouk Mekky, Mohamed Mahmoud Elshafei
{"title":"Impact of obstructive sleep apnea on cognition, mood, and fatigue: an MRI-based study","authors":"Rania Ahmad Sweed, Rana Alsaeed Rizk Abd Elghany, Anwar Ahmed Elganady, Enas Elsayed Mohamed, Jaidaa Farouk Mekky, Mohamed Mahmoud Elshafei","doi":"10.1186/s43168-023-00247-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obstructive sleep apnea disrupts the normal sleep cycle and is associated with many adverse consequences such as cardiovascular disease, DM, psychological problems, depression, decreased cognitive function, reduced quality of life, structural brain changes, and fatigue. This work aimed to study the MRI structural brain changes and to assess the neurocognitive function, depression, and fatigue using multiple questionnaires (MoCA score, BDI-П, and FSS, respectively) in OSA patients. We enrolled 30 patients > 18 years with moderate (severity groups І), severe (severity groups П), very severe or extremely severe OSA (severity groups Ш), and 10 control subjects that were matched. All patients and control subjects underwent full-night PSG. Patients underwent neuropsychological tests including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Beck’s Depression Inventory-II, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) in addition to an MRI brain without contrast. The mean AHI among patients (56.7% were females and 43.3% were males) was 39.97 ± 20.26 event/h. Severity groups І (40% of studied patients), П (46.7%), and Ш (13.3%). Abnormal MRI findings (WMCs) were detected in 18 patients (60%), versus 4 subjects (40%) in the control group, showing no statistically significant difference, p = 0.300. Among different severity groups, the prevalence of abnormal MRI findings was 4 (33.3%), 11 (78.6%), and 3 (75%) patients in severity groups І, П, and Ш, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between patients and control regarding affection of subcortical and corpus callosal regions, p = 0.007 and 0.38, respectively, but not periventricular or deep white matter hyperintensities. Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Beck’s Depression Inventory-II score, and Fatigue Severity Scale, all showed statistically significant differences between patient and control groups. There was a significant negative correlation between AHI and MoCA score and a significant positive correlation between AHI and BDI-П, and also between AHI and FSS, p = 0.005, 0.016, and 0.008, respectively. The Frontal lobe was the most affected lobe among our patients followed by the parietal lobe. The mean value of AHI in the group of patients with abnormal MRI findings was statistically significantly higher than that in the group with normal MRI findings (45.42 ± 19.29 versus 32.06 ± 19.82 event/h, respectively), p = 0.010. Comparing both groups showed: that the mean value of MoCA score in the group of patients with abnormal MRI findings was significantly lower than that in the group with normal MRI findings (17.89 ± 3.64 versus 24.08 ± 4.44, respectively), p < 0.001. Regarding both BDI-П and FSS, it was noted that the mean value in the group of patients with abnormal MRI findings was higher than that in the group with normal MRI findings (33.83 ± 7.94 versus 32 ± 7.39, and (58.39 ± 4.82 versus 55.17 ± 7.12 respectively), but this difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.529, p = 1.000, respectively. There was no significant difference between patients and the control group regarding WMCs in general, but there was a significant difference regarding the presence of subcortical and corpus callosal white matter hyperintensities. The Frontal lobe was the most affected. Neurocognitive function, depression, and fatigue were significantly affected in OSA patients in comparison to the control group. OSA patients with WMCs had a significantly higher AHI and a significantly lower MoCA score.","PeriodicalId":22426,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-023-00247-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea disrupts the normal sleep cycle and is associated with many adverse consequences such as cardiovascular disease, DM, psychological problems, depression, decreased cognitive function, reduced quality of life, structural brain changes, and fatigue. This work aimed to study the MRI structural brain changes and to assess the neurocognitive function, depression, and fatigue using multiple questionnaires (MoCA score, BDI-П, and FSS, respectively) in OSA patients. We enrolled 30 patients > 18 years with moderate (severity groups І), severe (severity groups П), very severe or extremely severe OSA (severity groups Ш), and 10 control subjects that were matched. All patients and control subjects underwent full-night PSG. Patients underwent neuropsychological tests including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Beck’s Depression Inventory-II, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) in addition to an MRI brain without contrast. The mean AHI among patients (56.7% were females and 43.3% were males) was 39.97 ± 20.26 event/h. Severity groups І (40% of studied patients), П (46.7%), and Ш (13.3%). Abnormal MRI findings (WMCs) were detected in 18 patients (60%), versus 4 subjects (40%) in the control group, showing no statistically significant difference, p = 0.300. Among different severity groups, the prevalence of abnormal MRI findings was 4 (33.3%), 11 (78.6%), and 3 (75%) patients in severity groups І, П, and Ш, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between patients and control regarding affection of subcortical and corpus callosal regions, p = 0.007 and 0.38, respectively, but not periventricular or deep white matter hyperintensities. Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Beck’s Depression Inventory-II score, and Fatigue Severity Scale, all showed statistically significant differences between patient and control groups. There was a significant negative correlation between AHI and MoCA score and a significant positive correlation between AHI and BDI-П, and also between AHI and FSS, p = 0.005, 0.016, and 0.008, respectively. The Frontal lobe was the most affected lobe among our patients followed by the parietal lobe. The mean value of AHI in the group of patients with abnormal MRI findings was statistically significantly higher than that in the group with normal MRI findings (45.42 ± 19.29 versus 32.06 ± 19.82 event/h, respectively), p = 0.010. Comparing both groups showed: that the mean value of MoCA score in the group of patients with abnormal MRI findings was significantly lower than that in the group with normal MRI findings (17.89 ± 3.64 versus 24.08 ± 4.44, respectively), p < 0.001. Regarding both BDI-П and FSS, it was noted that the mean value in the group of patients with abnormal MRI findings was higher than that in the group with normal MRI findings (33.83 ± 7.94 versus 32 ± 7.39, and (58.39 ± 4.82 versus 55.17 ± 7.12 respectively), but this difference was not statistically significant, p = 0.529, p = 1.000, respectively. There was no significant difference between patients and the control group regarding WMCs in general, but there was a significant difference regarding the presence of subcortical and corpus callosal white matter hyperintensities. The Frontal lobe was the most affected. Neurocognitive function, depression, and fatigue were significantly affected in OSA patients in comparison to the control group. OSA patients with WMCs had a significantly higher AHI and a significantly lower MoCA score.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停对认知、情绪和疲劳的影响:基于核磁共振成像的研究
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停会扰乱正常的睡眠周期,并与许多不良后果相关,如心血管疾病、糖尿病、心理问题、抑郁、认知功能下降、生活质量降低、脑结构变化和疲劳。本研究旨在研究 OSA 患者的 MRI 脑结构变化,并使用多种问卷(分别为 MoCA 评分、BDI-П 和 FSS)评估其神经认知功能、抑郁和疲劳情况。我们招募了 30 名年龄大于 18 岁的中度(严重程度为І)、重度(严重程度为П)、极重度或极重度 OSA 患者(严重程度为Ш),以及 10 名匹配的对照组受试者。所有患者和对照组均接受了整夜 PSG 检查。患者接受了神经心理学测试,包括蒙特利尔认知评估、贝克抑郁量表-II 和疲劳严重程度量表 (FSS),此外还接受了无对比核磁共振脑成像检查。患者(56.7% 为女性,43.3% 为男性)的平均 AHI 为 39.97 ± 20.26 事件/小时。严重程度分为І组(40%的患者)、П组(46.7%)和Ш组(13.3%)。18名患者(60%)与对照组的4名患者(40%)相比,磁共振成像结果(WMCs)异常,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.300)。在不同严重程度组别中,严重程度І、П和Ш组分别有4名(33.3%)、11名(78.6%)和3名(75%)患者出现异常磁共振成像结果。在皮层下和胼胝体区域,患者与对照组之间存在统计学差异,分别为 p = 0.007 和 0.38,但在脑室周围或深部白质高密度方面没有差异。蒙特利尔认知评估、贝克抑郁量表-II评分和疲劳严重程度量表在患者组和对照组之间均显示出显著的统计学差异。AHI与MoCA评分呈显著负相关,AHI与BDI-П呈显著正相关,AHI与FSS也呈显著正相关,P分别为0.005、0.016和0.008。在我们的患者中,额叶受影响最严重,其次是顶叶。核磁共振成像结果异常组患者的 AHI 平均值(分别为 45.42 ± 19.29 和 32.06 ± 19.82 事件/小时)明显高于核磁共振成像结果正常组,P = 0.010。两组患者的比较结果显示:磁共振成像结果异常组患者的MoCA评分均值(分别为17.89±3.64和24.08±4.44)明显低于磁共振成像结果正常组,P < 0.001。在 BDI-П 和 FSS 方面,磁共振成像结果异常患者组的平均值高于磁共振成像结果正常组(分别为(33.83 ± 7.94)对(32 ± 7.39)和(58.39 ± 4.82)对(55.17 ± 7.12)),但差异无统计学意义,分别为 p = 0.529 和 p = 1.000。总体而言,患者和对照组在白质密度方面没有明显差异,但在皮层下和胼胝体白质高密度方面存在明显差异。额叶受影响最大。与对照组相比,OSA 患者的神经认知功能、抑郁和疲劳受到明显影响。伴有WMCs的OSA患者的AHI明显升高,MoCA评分明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severity, mortality, and incidence of venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients Accuracy of convex probe EBUS-TBNA versus FDG-PET/CT imaging in diagnosis and mediastinal staging of lung cancer patients; an Egyptian Experience Role of pleural manometry and transthoracic ultrasonography to predict entrapped lung Comparing the outcome of using high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure The role of screening of patients proved to have gastroesophageal reflux disease by upper gastrointestinal endoscope for early detection of interstitial lung diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1