Domestic colonisation: The centrality of the home in experiences of home-takeovers and hate relationships

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1111/tran.12660
John Clayton, Catherine Donovan, Stephen J. Macdonald
{"title":"Domestic colonisation: The centrality of the home in experiences of home-takeovers and hate relationships","authors":"John Clayton, Catherine Donovan, Stephen J. Macdonald","doi":"10.1111/tran.12660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we introduce the concept of ‘domestic colonisation’ as a contribution to the literature on critical geographies of home. This provides a lens to focus on the ways in which domestic spaces might be exploited and/or dominated though familiar relationships. With reference to two research projects in North East England, we explore everyday occupations and sieges of home-spaces by neighbours as a means of reinforcing positions of relative social advantage. We show how these experiences become overwhelming through the intrusion of home-spaces and (with it) the life worlds of already structurally vulnerable(ised) communities. Domestic colonisation allows us to think through both the damage done through/to the home and connections beyond those spaces. To do this we focus on ‘home takeovers’ (or ‘cuckooing’) and ‘hate relationships’. Our work on cuckooing shows how the occupation and control of the home by those who re-produce and seize upon structurally vulnerable(ised) people, is a process which re-configures the home as an exploitable resource. Understandings of home and intimate social relationships as ‘private’, combined with complexities regarding culpability, conceal the damage done in contexts of diminished social infrastructure. With reference to our work on hate relationships, we outline how homes are a means of identifying and targeting those who become subjected to a range of hateful acts. This produces everyday spaces of siege and entrapment that control, immobilise and are difficult to escape. Formal interventions are unable to adequately support those victimised through lack of recognition, misrecognition as atomised disputes and a tendency to (re)move those victimised. We end by questioning how we might better address the needs of those subjected to such harms, with an emphasis on the relational production of the home.","PeriodicalId":48278,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers","volume":"196 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we introduce the concept of ‘domestic colonisation’ as a contribution to the literature on critical geographies of home. This provides a lens to focus on the ways in which domestic spaces might be exploited and/or dominated though familiar relationships. With reference to two research projects in North East England, we explore everyday occupations and sieges of home-spaces by neighbours as a means of reinforcing positions of relative social advantage. We show how these experiences become overwhelming through the intrusion of home-spaces and (with it) the life worlds of already structurally vulnerable(ised) communities. Domestic colonisation allows us to think through both the damage done through/to the home and connections beyond those spaces. To do this we focus on ‘home takeovers’ (or ‘cuckooing’) and ‘hate relationships’. Our work on cuckooing shows how the occupation and control of the home by those who re-produce and seize upon structurally vulnerable(ised) people, is a process which re-configures the home as an exploitable resource. Understandings of home and intimate social relationships as ‘private’, combined with complexities regarding culpability, conceal the damage done in contexts of diminished social infrastructure. With reference to our work on hate relationships, we outline how homes are a means of identifying and targeting those who become subjected to a range of hateful acts. This produces everyday spaces of siege and entrapment that control, immobilise and are difficult to escape. Formal interventions are unable to adequately support those victimised through lack of recognition, misrecognition as atomised disputes and a tendency to (re)move those victimised. We end by questioning how we might better address the needs of those subjected to such harms, with an emphasis on the relational production of the home.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭殖民化:家庭在家庭接管和仇恨关系经历中的中心地位
在本文中,我们引入了 "家庭殖民化 "的概念,作为对批判性家庭地理学文献的贡献。这为我们提供了一个视角,聚焦于通过熟悉的关系利用和/或支配家庭空间的方式。通过参考英格兰东北部的两个研究项目,我们探讨了邻居对家庭空间的日常占用和围攻,以此来巩固相对的社会优势地位。我们展示了这些经历是如何通过侵入家庭空间以及(随之而来的)已经结构脆弱的社区的生活世界而变得不堪重负的。家庭殖民化使我们能够思考通过/对家庭造成的损害以及这些空间之外的联系。为此,我们重点关注 "家庭接管"(或 "布谷鸟")和 "仇恨关系"。我们在 "布谷鸟 "方面的研究表明,那些重新生产和攫取结构性弱势人群的人对家的占领和控制,是如何将家重新配置为一种可开发资源的过程。将家庭和亲密的社会关系理解为 "私人",再加上罪责的复杂性,掩盖了在社会基础设施减少的背景下所造成的损害。参照我们在仇恨关系方面的工作,我们概述了家庭是如何成为识别和锁定那些成为一系列仇恨行为对象的手段的。这就形成了日常的围困空间,使人受到控制,动弹不得,难以逃脱。由于缺乏认识、被误认为是孤立的争端以及倾向于(重新)转移受害者,正式的干预措施无法为受害者提供充分的支持。最后,我们将质疑如何才能更好地满足那些受到此类伤害的人的需求,并将重点放在家庭的关系生产上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Transactions is one of the foremost international journals of geographical research. It publishes the very best scholarship from around the world and across the whole spectrum of research in the discipline. In particular, the distinctive role of the journal is to: • Publish "landmark· articles that make a major theoretical, conceptual or empirical contribution to the advancement of geography as an academic discipline. • Stimulate and shape research agendas in human and physical geography. • Publish articles, "Boundary crossing" essays and commentaries that are international and interdisciplinary in their scope and content.
期刊最新文献
Metabolic politics: A comparative synthesis Losing control: REF 2029 and the downgrading of academic outputs Mapping, geography Geographies of slavery in the Les Malouines/Las Malvinas/Falklands Islands: The Maroon connection The joy of maps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1