An inpatient fall risk assessment tool: Application of machine learning models on intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors

Sonia Jahangiri, Masoud Abdollahi, Rasika Patil, Ehsan Rashedi, Nasibeh Azadeh-Fard
{"title":"An inpatient fall risk assessment tool: Application of machine learning models on intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors","authors":"Sonia Jahangiri,&nbsp;Masoud Abdollahi,&nbsp;Rasika Patil,&nbsp;Ehsan Rashedi,&nbsp;Nasibeh Azadeh-Fard","doi":"10.1016/j.mlwa.2023.100519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to identify the most impactful set of intrinsic and extrinsic fall risk factors and develop a data-driven inpatient fall risk assessment tool (FRAT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The dataset used for the study comprised in-hospital fall records from 2012 to 2017. Four machine learning (ML) algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (Gboost), and Deep Neural Network (DNN) were utilized to predict the inpatient fall risk level. To enhance the performance of the prediction models, two approaches were implemented, including (1) feature selection to identify the optimal feature set and (2) the development of three distinct shift-wise models. Furthermore, the optimal feature sets in the shift-wise models were extracted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>According to the results, DNN outperformed other methods by reaching an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.71, 0.8, 0.6, and 0.7, respectively, considering the full set of features. The performance of the models was further improved (by 3-5 %) by conducting a feature selection process for all models. Specifically, the DNN model achieved an accuracy of 0.74 while considering the optimal set of predictors. Moreover, the shift-wise RF models demonstrated higher accuracies (by 4-10 %) compared to the same model using a full feature set.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study's outcome confirms ML models' compelling capability in developing an inpatient FRAT while considering intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The insight from such models could form a foundation to (1) monitor the inpatients’ fall risk, (2) identify the major factors involved in inpatient falls, and (3) create subject-specific self-care plans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74093,"journal":{"name":"Machine learning with applications","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666827023000725/pdfft?md5=4a2d470f18c0e62a81481dcea8beab5f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666827023000725-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine learning with applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666827023000725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to identify the most impactful set of intrinsic and extrinsic fall risk factors and develop a data-driven inpatient fall risk assessment tool (FRAT).

Methods

The dataset used for the study comprised in-hospital fall records from 2012 to 2017. Four machine learning (ML) algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (Gboost), and Deep Neural Network (DNN) were utilized to predict the inpatient fall risk level. To enhance the performance of the prediction models, two approaches were implemented, including (1) feature selection to identify the optimal feature set and (2) the development of three distinct shift-wise models. Furthermore, the optimal feature sets in the shift-wise models were extracted.

Results

According to the results, DNN outperformed other methods by reaching an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.71, 0.8, 0.6, and 0.7, respectively, considering the full set of features. The performance of the models was further improved (by 3-5 %) by conducting a feature selection process for all models. Specifically, the DNN model achieved an accuracy of 0.74 while considering the optimal set of predictors. Moreover, the shift-wise RF models demonstrated higher accuracies (by 4-10 %) compared to the same model using a full feature set.

Conclusions

This study's outcome confirms ML models' compelling capability in developing an inpatient FRAT while considering intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The insight from such models could form a foundation to (1) monitor the inpatients’ fall risk, (2) identify the major factors involved in inpatient falls, and (3) create subject-specific self-care plans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院病人跌倒风险评估工具:将机器学习模型应用于内在和外在风险因素
背景本研究旨在确定一组最有影响的内在和外在跌倒风险因素,并开发一种数据驱动的住院病人跌倒风险评估工具(FRAT)。研究采用了四种机器学习(ML)算法:支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)、梯度提升(Gboost)和深度神经网络(DNN)来预测住院病人跌倒风险水平。为提高预测模型的性能,采用了两种方法,包括(1)特征选择以确定最佳特征集;(2)开发三种不同的移位模型。结果根据结果,考虑到全套特征,DNN 的准确度、灵敏度、特异度和 AUC 分别达到 0.71、0.8、0.6 和 0.7,优于其他方法。通过对所有模型进行特征选择,模型的性能得到了进一步提高(提高了 3-5%)。具体来说,DNN 模型在考虑最优预测因子集时,准确率达到了 0.74。此外,与使用完整特征集的同一模型相比,移位 RF 模型的准确率更高(4-10%)。此类模型的洞察力可为以下工作奠定基础:(1) 监控住院病人的跌倒风险;(2) 识别住院病人跌倒的主要因素;(3) 制定针对特定对象的自我护理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Machine learning with applications
Machine learning with applications Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
98 days
期刊最新文献
Document Layout Error Rate (DLER) metric to evaluate image segmentation methods Supervised machine learning for microbiomics: Bridging the gap between current and best practices Playing with words: Comparing the vocabulary and lexical diversity of ChatGPT and humans A survey on knowledge distillation: Recent advancements Texas rural land market integration: A causal analysis using machine learning applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1