Surgical salvage for recurrent vestibular schwannoma after primary stereotactic radiosurgery

José Orlando de Melo Junior, Victor H. C. Benalia, J. Landeiro
{"title":"Surgical salvage for recurrent vestibular schwannoma after primary stereotactic radiosurgery","authors":"José Orlando de Melo Junior, Victor H. C. Benalia, J. Landeiro","doi":"10.25259/sni_875_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe management of vestibular schwannoma has evolved over the past hundred years. In the last decades, surgery has been gradually replaced by radiation therapy as a primary treatment modality, particularly for small tumors, due to the less invasive nature and the compared reported outcomes in tumor control and hearing preservation. However, irradiation sometimes fails to stop tumor growth. In a long-term follow-up after primary fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, the rate of treatment failure was reported as 3% and needed surgical salvage. For single-fraction modality, Hasegawa et al. reported salvage treatment after primary Gamma Knife radiosurgery in 8%, where 90% of these underwent surgery and 50% of those who were treated with a second gamma knife surgery required surgical intervention later. An increase in tumor volume by more than 10–20%, tumor growth after three years, and no return to pretreatment volume after transient swelling have been considered as tumor recurrence rather than pseudoprogression, a transient increase in tumor volume after radiotherapy that occurs up to 30% of cases. It has been reported that microsurgery after radiotherapy is more difficult, with most authors reporting a loss of defined arachnoid planes and worse cranial nerve outcomes, especially for hearing and facial nerve function.\n\n\n\nA 43-year-old female patient was incidentally (asymptomatic) diagnosed on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan harboring a left vestibular schwannoma, grade T2 (Hannover classification), in 2015. Neurologic examination was unremarkable, and audiometry testing was normal. She was initially treated with observation. Three years later, in 2018, the lesion had enlarged, becoming a grade T3a and reaching the cistern of the cerebellopontine angle. The tumor was then treated with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (5 sessions of 5 Gy). MRI scans in 2019 and 2020 showed slight tumor growth. This enlargement was attributed to a pseudoprogression after radiosurgery, and only observation was advocated. In 2022, 4 years later, after radiosurgery, the tumor was still growing, and the patient began to suffer from hearing loss. A failure treatment was considered, and microsurgery was indicated. The patient was counseled about the risk of functional nerve impairment, and surgical consent was obtained. A retro sigmoid approach was planned. A gross total resection was attempted due to the clear subperineural plane during tumor dissection and because it was the only option that would provide a cure for the patient. The adjacent neurovascular structures were firmly adhered to the tumor capsule, which represented a major challenge for microdissection. The tumor was soft, without significant bleeding. A total resection was achieved, and the facial nerve was anatomically preserved. The patient developed facial paresis (House-Brackmann III) in the immediate postoperative period, which improved at the 6-month follow-up. Hearing loss did not improve. Postoperative MRI showed total resection.\n\n\n\nMicrosurgery after radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma is challenging in terms of indication, when to indicate, resection target, difficulty in dissection due to local changes, and outcome. Gross total resection may be considered, as it is the only treatment that may provide a cure for the patient. However, the patient should be counseled about the risks.\n","PeriodicalId":38981,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Neurology International","volume":"3 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_875_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The management of vestibular schwannoma has evolved over the past hundred years. In the last decades, surgery has been gradually replaced by radiation therapy as a primary treatment modality, particularly for small tumors, due to the less invasive nature and the compared reported outcomes in tumor control and hearing preservation. However, irradiation sometimes fails to stop tumor growth. In a long-term follow-up after primary fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, the rate of treatment failure was reported as 3% and needed surgical salvage. For single-fraction modality, Hasegawa et al. reported salvage treatment after primary Gamma Knife radiosurgery in 8%, where 90% of these underwent surgery and 50% of those who were treated with a second gamma knife surgery required surgical intervention later. An increase in tumor volume by more than 10–20%, tumor growth after three years, and no return to pretreatment volume after transient swelling have been considered as tumor recurrence rather than pseudoprogression, a transient increase in tumor volume after radiotherapy that occurs up to 30% of cases. It has been reported that microsurgery after radiotherapy is more difficult, with most authors reporting a loss of defined arachnoid planes and worse cranial nerve outcomes, especially for hearing and facial nerve function. A 43-year-old female patient was incidentally (asymptomatic) diagnosed on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan harboring a left vestibular schwannoma, grade T2 (Hannover classification), in 2015. Neurologic examination was unremarkable, and audiometry testing was normal. She was initially treated with observation. Three years later, in 2018, the lesion had enlarged, becoming a grade T3a and reaching the cistern of the cerebellopontine angle. The tumor was then treated with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (5 sessions of 5 Gy). MRI scans in 2019 and 2020 showed slight tumor growth. This enlargement was attributed to a pseudoprogression after radiosurgery, and only observation was advocated. In 2022, 4 years later, after radiosurgery, the tumor was still growing, and the patient began to suffer from hearing loss. A failure treatment was considered, and microsurgery was indicated. The patient was counseled about the risk of functional nerve impairment, and surgical consent was obtained. A retro sigmoid approach was planned. A gross total resection was attempted due to the clear subperineural plane during tumor dissection and because it was the only option that would provide a cure for the patient. The adjacent neurovascular structures were firmly adhered to the tumor capsule, which represented a major challenge for microdissection. The tumor was soft, without significant bleeding. A total resection was achieved, and the facial nerve was anatomically preserved. The patient developed facial paresis (House-Brackmann III) in the immediate postoperative period, which improved at the 6-month follow-up. Hearing loss did not improve. Postoperative MRI showed total resection. Microsurgery after radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma is challenging in terms of indication, when to indicate, resection target, difficulty in dissection due to local changes, and outcome. Gross total resection may be considered, as it is the only treatment that may provide a cure for the patient. However, the patient should be counseled about the risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性立体定向放射外科手术后复发前庭分裂瘤的手术抢救
前庭神经鞘瘤的治疗在过去的一百年里不断发展。在过去的几十年里,手术已经逐渐被放射治疗取代,成为主要的治疗方式,特别是对于小肿瘤,因为放射治疗的侵入性较小,并且在肿瘤控制和听力保护方面的报道结果比较好。然而,照射有时不能阻止肿瘤的生长。在初次分割立体定向放疗后的长期随访中,治疗失败率为3%,需要手术挽救。对于单部分模式,Hasegawa等人报道了8%的初次伽玛刀放射手术后的抢救治疗,其中90%的患者接受了手术,50%的患者接受了第二次伽玛刀手术后需要手术干预。肿瘤体积增加超过10-20%,三年后肿瘤生长,一过性肿胀后体积没有恢复到治疗前的水平,被认为是肿瘤复发而不是假进展,在放疗后肿瘤体积一过性增加的病例高达30%。据报道,放射治疗后的显微手术更加困难,大多数作者报告了明确的蛛网膜平面的丧失和更差的颅神经预后,特别是听力和面神经功能。一名43岁女性患者于2015年偶然(无症状)在磁共振成像(MRI)扫描中被诊断为左侧前庭神经鞘瘤,T2级(汉诺威分级)。神经学检查无异常,听力测试正常。她最初接受观察治疗。三年后,即2018年,病变扩大,达到T3a级,并到达桥小脑角池。然后用立体定向放射手术治疗肿瘤(5次5 Gy)。2019年和2020年的核磁共振扫描显示肿瘤轻微增长。这种增大归因于放射手术后的假性进展,只提倡观察。4年后的2022年,放疗后肿瘤仍在生长,患者开始出现听力损失。考虑治疗失败,建议显微手术治疗。患者被告知功能性神经损伤的风险,并获得手术同意。计划逆行乙状结肠入路。由于肿瘤解剖过程中神经下平面清晰,也因为这是治愈患者的唯一选择,所以我们尝试了全切除。邻近的神经血管结构牢固地粘附在肿瘤囊上,这是显微解剖的主要挑战。肿瘤柔软,无明显出血。手术完全切除,解剖上保留了面神经。患者术后立即出现面部轻瘫(House-Brackmann III型),6个月随访时改善。听力损失没有改善。术后MRI显示全切除。前庭神经鞘瘤放射治疗后显微手术在适应证、何时提示、切除目标、局部改变导致解剖困难、预后等方面具有挑战性。可以考虑大体全切除,因为这是唯一可以治愈患者的治疗方法。然而,患者应该被告知风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊最新文献
Cauda equina syndrome due to posttraumatic syringomyelia in conus medullaris – A case report Patients with meningioma hemorrhage should undergo an autopsy if they die from it despite successful surgery Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of residual parasellar growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma in a patient with kissing internal carotid arteries: Technical nuances Microsurgery resection of giant cervicothoracic spinal ependymoma: Two-dimensional operative video Non-granulomatous meningoencephalitis with Balamuthia mandrillaris mimicking a tumor: First confirmed case from Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1