Evaluating consistency of physical activity and exercise prescription in the UK for people with diabetes – a Delphi study

Clare Strongman, Francesca Cavallerio, Matthew A. Timmis, Andrew Morrison
{"title":"Evaluating consistency of physical activity and exercise prescription in the UK for people with diabetes – a Delphi study","authors":"Clare Strongman, Francesca Cavallerio, Matthew A. Timmis, Andrew Morrison","doi":"10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1278597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased physical activity is recommended as a cost-effective measure to tackle long-term management of people with diabetes, but research on interventions lacks consistency in terms of effective duration and modality. The aim of this study was to evaluate expert consensus on exercise and physical activity prescription via a three-round Delphi study conducted with 45 UK-based health and fitness professionals experienced in prescribing exercise or physical activity to people with diabetes.The majority of items put forward to the panel reached consensus with 70% or above voting these items as important, but the details of the type, duration and/or modality of exercise or physical activity prescription within these items often contradicted each other, suggesting that patients are receiving inconsistent advice. The range of different exercise prescription found in this study suggests that patients are being given inconsistent and potentially confusing advice, which may affect their participation in exercise and long-term lifestyle change.More consistent promotion of advice from healthcare and fitness professionals may help with increasing physical activity in this participant group and achieving long term behavior change, reducing patient symptoms as well as reducing the cost to the National Health Service (NHS).","PeriodicalId":73075,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","volume":"33 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1278597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increased physical activity is recommended as a cost-effective measure to tackle long-term management of people with diabetes, but research on interventions lacks consistency in terms of effective duration and modality. The aim of this study was to evaluate expert consensus on exercise and physical activity prescription via a three-round Delphi study conducted with 45 UK-based health and fitness professionals experienced in prescribing exercise or physical activity to people with diabetes.The majority of items put forward to the panel reached consensus with 70% or above voting these items as important, but the details of the type, duration and/or modality of exercise or physical activity prescription within these items often contradicted each other, suggesting that patients are receiving inconsistent advice. The range of different exercise prescription found in this study suggests that patients are being given inconsistent and potentially confusing advice, which may affect their participation in exercise and long-term lifestyle change.More consistent promotion of advice from healthcare and fitness professionals may help with increasing physical activity in this participant group and achieving long term behavior change, reducing patient symptoms as well as reducing the cost to the National Health Service (NHS).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估英国糖尿病患者体育锻炼和运动处方的一致性--德尔菲研究
增加身体活动被推荐为解决糖尿病患者长期管理问题的一种具有成本效益的措施,但有关干预措施的研究在有效持续时间和方式方面缺乏一致性。本研究的目的是通过一项三轮德尔菲研究来评估专家对运动和体育活动处方的共识,该研究由45名英国健康和健身专业人士进行,他们在为糖尿病患者开运动或体育活动处方方面经验丰富。提交给专家组的大多数项目都达成了共识,70%或以上的人认为这些项目很重要,但这些项目中关于运动或体育活动处方的类型、持续时间和/或方式的细节往往相互矛盾,表明患者接受了不一致的建议。在这项研究中发现的各种不同的运动处方表明,患者得到的建议不一致,甚至可能令人困惑,这可能会影响他们参与运动和长期改变生活方式。更一致地推广医疗保健和健身专业人员的建议可能有助于增加这一参与者群体的身体活动,实现长期的行为改变,减轻患者的症状,并减少国家卫生服务(NHS)的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilization of basic diabetes mellitus services among adult patients with diabetes mellitus at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital diabetes clinic, Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Optimizing glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: the impact of the GLIDE program's personalized digital health intervention. Metabolic syndrome among type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Novel antidiabetic therapies in patients with peripheral artery disease: current perspective. Editorial: Gestational diabetes: where are we and where are we going?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1