Investigating risk of public–private partnerships (PPPs) for smart transportation infrastructure project development

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Built Environment Project and Asset Management Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1108/bepam-03-2023-0053
Tiep Nguyen, Leonie Hallo, Indra Gunawan
{"title":"Investigating risk of public–private partnerships (PPPs) for smart transportation infrastructure project development","authors":"Tiep Nguyen, Leonie Hallo, Indra Gunawan","doi":"10.1108/bepam-03-2023-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to rank critical risks and determine major categories of risks to be considered by public–private partnerships (PPPs) investors when investing in “smart” transportation infrastructure. Such investment is sorely needed in many mega cities around the world currently suffering from serious impacts of traffic congestion, pollution and lack of usability of transport systems.Design/methodology/approachThe study used literature review focused upon smart transportation infrastructure projects financed by PPP arrangements to create a questionnaire which was refined by subject matter experts and then completed by 126 experienced respondents. Exploratory factor analysis was used to create major categories emerging from the collected data. Interviews with ten experts were used to validate the findings.FindingsThe most highly major ranked risks shared by these participants were lack of expertise in complex project implementation, political interference, lack of PPP project data and lack of a collaboration mechanism between government and private sectors. Factor analysis showed that in terms of risk likelihood, stakeholder engagement, implementation process issues, the natural environment, data-sharing and technology complexity emerged. In terms of risk impact, major factors were stakeholder engagement, trust versus resistance issues, the natural environment and factors concerning uncertainty.Originality/valueThis paper addresses a somewhat unexplored area, the risks involved in investing in PPP smart transportation infrastructure. Such infrastructure projects are embedded in their environments, and approaches using a complexity lens can emerge overriding risk concerns for investors when undertaking such projects.","PeriodicalId":46426,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-03-2023-0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to rank critical risks and determine major categories of risks to be considered by public–private partnerships (PPPs) investors when investing in “smart” transportation infrastructure. Such investment is sorely needed in many mega cities around the world currently suffering from serious impacts of traffic congestion, pollution and lack of usability of transport systems.Design/methodology/approachThe study used literature review focused upon smart transportation infrastructure projects financed by PPP arrangements to create a questionnaire which was refined by subject matter experts and then completed by 126 experienced respondents. Exploratory factor analysis was used to create major categories emerging from the collected data. Interviews with ten experts were used to validate the findings.FindingsThe most highly major ranked risks shared by these participants were lack of expertise in complex project implementation, political interference, lack of PPP project data and lack of a collaboration mechanism between government and private sectors. Factor analysis showed that in terms of risk likelihood, stakeholder engagement, implementation process issues, the natural environment, data-sharing and technology complexity emerged. In terms of risk impact, major factors were stakeholder engagement, trust versus resistance issues, the natural environment and factors concerning uncertainty.Originality/valueThis paper addresses a somewhat unexplored area, the risks involved in investing in PPP smart transportation infrastructure. Such infrastructure projects are embedded in their environments, and approaches using a complexity lens can emerge overriding risk concerns for investors when undertaking such projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)在智能交通基础设施项目开发中的风险
本文的目的是对关键风险进行排名,并确定公私合作伙伴关系(ppp)投资者在投资“智能”交通基础设施时需要考虑的主要风险类别。世界上许多大城市目前正遭受交通拥堵、污染和交通系统缺乏可用性的严重影响,迫切需要这种投资。设计/方法/方法本研究采用文献综述的方法,重点关注由PPP安排资助的智能交通基础设施项目,并制作了一份问卷,由主题专家进行了完善,然后由126名经验丰富的受访者完成。探索性因子分析用于从收集的数据中创建主要类别。与10位专家的访谈被用来验证研究结果。调查结果这些参与者共同面临的排名最高的风险是缺乏复杂项目实施方面的专业知识、政治干预、缺乏PPP项目数据以及缺乏政府和私营部门之间的合作机制。因子分析表明,在风险可能性、利益相关者参与、实施过程问题、自然环境、数据共享和技术复杂性方面出现了差异。在风险影响方面,主要因素是利益相关者参与、信任与抵制问题、自然环境和不确定性因素。原创性/价值本文探讨了一个尚未开发的领域,即投资PPP智能交通基础设施所涉及的风险。这类基础设施项目嵌入其环境中,在开展此类项目时,使用复杂性视角的方法可能会出现投资者最关注的风险问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Application of lean principles for building refurbishment projects in Sri Lanka Unraveling consumer behavioral intentions to adopt solar water heaters in India using UTAUT model Ex ante required rates of return and related factors in Indonesian PPP infrastructure projects Benefits and challenges of implementing green building development in Nigeria Developing a framework for building information modelling (BIM) adoption in New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1