Efficiency Comparison of Prediction Methods and Analysis of Factors Affecting Savings of People in the Central Region of Thailand

IF 1.7 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1155/2023/1388200
Achara Phaeobang, Saichon Sinsomboonthong
{"title":"Efficiency Comparison of Prediction Methods and Analysis of Factors Affecting Savings of People in the Central Region of Thailand","authors":"Achara Phaeobang, Saichon Sinsomboonthong","doi":"10.1155/2023/1388200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inarguably, saving is very important for the life of a senior citizen. Artificial neural network (ANN) and multiple linear regression (MLR) analyses have been successfully used to predict and analyze factors affecting the savings of people in several regions of the world. Many studies concluded that ANN is more efficient than MLR. However, some studies concluded that MLR is more efficient. To investigate this issue further, this study directly compared the efficiencies of unoptimized ANN and MLR in predicting and analyzing factors affecting the savings of people in the central region of Thailand in 2019, based on secondary data from a household socioeconomic survey, i.e., the National Statistical Staff Household Income Survey. The data were collected from January 2019 to December 2019 from questionnaires distributed to samples of households. The savings of people in the 25 provinces of Thailand were investigated with MLR and unoptimized ANN. Their prediction efficiencies were compared in terms of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R2), and processing time. The results showed that for all categories of savings—savings of low-, middle-, and high-income households—MLR was faster in processing time. It also provided a lower RMSE and a higher R2 than the unoptimized ANN. Nevertheless, unoptimized ANN provided a lower MAE than MLR for the savings of low- and high-income household data. The most important factor affecting the savings of low-, middle-, and high-income households was the factor of deposit interest, bond, share dividends, and other types of investment.","PeriodicalId":15716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering","volume":"54 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1388200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inarguably, saving is very important for the life of a senior citizen. Artificial neural network (ANN) and multiple linear regression (MLR) analyses have been successfully used to predict and analyze factors affecting the savings of people in several regions of the world. Many studies concluded that ANN is more efficient than MLR. However, some studies concluded that MLR is more efficient. To investigate this issue further, this study directly compared the efficiencies of unoptimized ANN and MLR in predicting and analyzing factors affecting the savings of people in the central region of Thailand in 2019, based on secondary data from a household socioeconomic survey, i.e., the National Statistical Staff Household Income Survey. The data were collected from January 2019 to December 2019 from questionnaires distributed to samples of households. The savings of people in the 25 provinces of Thailand were investigated with MLR and unoptimized ANN. Their prediction efficiencies were compared in terms of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R2), and processing time. The results showed that for all categories of savings—savings of low-, middle-, and high-income households—MLR was faster in processing time. It also provided a lower RMSE and a higher R2 than the unoptimized ANN. Nevertheless, unoptimized ANN provided a lower MAE than MLR for the savings of low- and high-income household data. The most important factor affecting the savings of low-, middle-, and high-income households was the factor of deposit interest, bond, share dividends, and other types of investment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测方法的效率比较及影响泰国中部地区居民储蓄的因素分析
毫无疑问,储蓄对老年人的生活非常重要。人工神经网络(ANN)和多元线性回归(MLR)分析已成功地用于预测和分析影响世界几个地区人们储蓄的因素。许多研究得出结论,人工神经网络比MLR更有效。然而,一些研究得出结论,MLR更有效。为了进一步研究这一问题,本研究基于家庭社会经济调查(即国家统计人员家庭收入调查)的二手数据,直接比较了未优化的ANN和MLR在预测和分析2019年泰国中部地区居民储蓄影响因素方面的效率。这些数据是从2019年1月至2019年12月通过向家庭样本分发的问卷收集的。采用MLR和未优化人工神经网络对泰国25个省的居民储蓄进行了调查。从均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、决定系数(R2)和处理时间等方面比较其预测效率。结果表明,对于所有类别的储蓄-低收入,中等收入和高收入家庭的储蓄- mlr在处理时间上更快。与未优化的人工神经网络相比,它还提供了更低的RMSE和更高的R2。然而,对于低收入和高收入家庭数据的储蓄,未优化的人工神经网络提供了比MLR更低的MAE。影响低收入、中等收入和高收入家庭储蓄的最重要因素是存款利息、债券、股票股息和其他类型的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering
Journal of Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in several areas of engineering. The subject areas covered by the journal are: - Chemical Engineering - Civil Engineering - Computer Engineering - Electrical Engineering - Industrial Engineering - Mechanical Engineering
期刊最新文献
Study on the Safety Thickness of Three Zones against Fault Water Inrush: Case Study and Model Development Design and Maintenance Optimisation of Substation Automation Systems: A Multiobjectivisation Approach Exploration Effect of Source Type on Pore Structure and Properties of Aerated Geopolymer Concrete Improving Press Bending Production Quality through Finite Element Simulation: Integration CAD and CAE Approach Assessment of Traditional Asphalt Mixture Performance Using Natural Asphalt from Sulfur Springs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1