Breastfeeding among parous women offered home-visit by a midwife after early discharge following planned cesarean section: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.18332/ejm/173089
A. R. Kruse, F. Lauszus, Axel Forman, U. Kesmodel, Marie Bender Rugaard, Randi Karkov Knudsen, Eva-Kristina Persson, I. Sundtoft, Niels Uldbjerg
{"title":"Breastfeeding among parous women offered home-visit by a midwife after early discharge following planned cesarean section: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial","authors":"A. R. Kruse, F. Lauszus, Axel Forman, U. Kesmodel, Marie Bender Rugaard, Randi Karkov Knudsen, Eva-Kristina Persson, I. Sundtoft, Niels Uldbjerg","doi":"10.18332/ejm/173089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Early discharge holds several advantages and seems safe after planned cesarean section among low-risk women. However, breastfeeding rates are lower after cesarean section. Thus, concern has been raised that early discharge among these women may affect breastfeeding even further. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effect of early discharge the day after planned cesarean section on breastfeeding, among parous women when a home-visit by a midwife was provided the day after discharge. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Parous women (n=143) planned for cesarean section were allocated to either discharge within 28 hours after planned cesarean section followed by a home visit the day after (early discharge) or discharge at least 48 hours after planned cesarean section (standard care). The participants filled in questionnaires approximately 2 weeks before delivery and 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 months postpartum. RESULTS The proportions of women initiating breastfeeding were 84% versus 87% (early discharge vs standard care). After 6 months, 23% versus 21% were exclusively breastfeeding, while 29% versus 42% were partially breastfeeding. The mean duration of exclusive breastfeeding was 3.4 months (SD=2.3) in both groups. None of these differences was statistically significant. In both groups, the women’s breastfeeding self-efficacy score before cesarean section correlated with the duration of breastfeeding. After 4 weeks, low-score rates were 28% versus 30%. CONCLUSIONS Early discharge with follow-up home visits by a midwife after planned cesarean section in parous women is feasible without compromising breastfeeding.","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/173089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Early discharge holds several advantages and seems safe after planned cesarean section among low-risk women. However, breastfeeding rates are lower after cesarean section. Thus, concern has been raised that early discharge among these women may affect breastfeeding even further. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effect of early discharge the day after planned cesarean section on breastfeeding, among parous women when a home-visit by a midwife was provided the day after discharge. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Parous women (n=143) planned for cesarean section were allocated to either discharge within 28 hours after planned cesarean section followed by a home visit the day after (early discharge) or discharge at least 48 hours after planned cesarean section (standard care). The participants filled in questionnaires approximately 2 weeks before delivery and 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 months postpartum. RESULTS The proportions of women initiating breastfeeding were 84% versus 87% (early discharge vs standard care). After 6 months, 23% versus 21% were exclusively breastfeeding, while 29% versus 42% were partially breastfeeding. The mean duration of exclusive breastfeeding was 3.4 months (SD=2.3) in both groups. None of these differences was statistically significant. In both groups, the women’s breastfeeding self-efficacy score before cesarean section correlated with the duration of breastfeeding. After 4 weeks, low-score rates were 28% versus 30%. CONCLUSIONS Early discharge with follow-up home visits by a midwife after planned cesarean section in parous women is feasible without compromising breastfeeding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计划剖宫产术后提前出院的准妈妈在助产士家访后的母乳喂养情况:随机对照试验的二次分析
在低风险妇女中,计划剖宫产术后提前出院有几个好处,而且似乎是安全的。然而,剖宫产后母乳喂养率较低。因此,人们担心这些妇女过早出院可能会进一步影响母乳喂养。因此,我们的目的是评估在计划剖宫产后第二天提前出院对母乳喂养的影响,在分娩妇女中,助产士在出院后第二天提供家访。方法:我们对一项随机试验进行了二次分析。计划剖宫产的产妇(n=143)被分配在计划剖宫产后28小时内出院,并在第二天进行家访(提前出院)或在计划剖宫产后至少48小时出院(标准护理)。参与者大约在分娩前2周以及产后1周、4周和6个月填写问卷。结果开始母乳喂养的妇女比例为84%对87%(早期出院vs标准护理)。6个月后,23%对21%完全母乳喂养,29%对42%部分母乳喂养。两组平均纯母乳喂养时间为3.4个月(SD=2.3)。这些差异都没有统计学意义。两组产妇剖宫产前母乳喂养自我效能感评分均与母乳喂养持续时间相关。4周后,低评分率分别为28%和30%。结论:在不影响母乳喂养的情况下,计划剖宫产后经助产士随访家访的产妇早期出院是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Could a simple manual technique performed by a midwife reduce the incidence of episiotomy and perineal lacerations? A non-randomized pilot study. Impact of obstetric physiotherapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain management and gastrointestinal function following cesarean birth: A randomized controlled trial. Impact of fetal spine alignment according to maternal lateralization during early labor on maternal comfort and birth outcomes: A prospective cohort study in Kelantan, Malaysia. Immersive Virtual Reality (VR) when learning anatomy in midwifery education: A pre-post pilot study. Non-allergic factors that influence asthma control in pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1