Cerebral blood flow and neurocognition in patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis

R. Lazar, T. Myers, T. Gropen, M. Leesar, James Davies, A. Gerstenecker, Amani M. Norling, M. Pavol, R. Marshall, S. Kodali
{"title":"Cerebral blood flow and neurocognition in patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis","authors":"R. Lazar, T. Myers, T. Gropen, M. Leesar, James Davies, A. Gerstenecker, Amani M. Norling, M. Pavol, R. Marshall, S. Kodali","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Aortic valve stenosis (AS) results in higher systolic pressure to overcome resistance from the stenotic valve, leading to heart failure and decline in cardiac output. There has been no assessment of cerebral blood flow (CBF) association with neurocognition in AS, or the effects of valve replacement. The goal was to determine if AS is associated with altered cerebral hemodynamics and impaired neurocognition, and whether transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) improves hemodynamics and cognition.\n \n \n \n In 42 patients with planned TAVR, transcranial Doppler (TCD) assessed bilateral MCA mean flow velocity (MFV); abnormality was < 34.45 cm/sec. The neurocognitive battery assessed memory, language, attention, visual-spatial skills, and executive function, yielding a composite Z-score. Impairment was <1.5 SDs below the normative mean.\n \n \n \n The mean age was 78 years, 59%M, and the mean valve gradient was 46.87mm/Hg. Mean follow-up was 36 days post-TAVR (range 27 - 55). Pre-TAVR, the mean MFV was 42.36 cm/sec (SD=10.17), and the mean cognitive Z-score was -0.22 SD’s (range -1.99 to 1.08) below the normative mean. Among the 34 patients who returned after TAVR, the MFV was 41.59 cm/sec (SD=10.42), not different from baseline (p=0.66, 2.28-3.67). Post-TAVR average Zscores were 0.05 SDs above the normative mean, not meeting the pre-specified threshold for a clinically significant 0.5 SD change.\n \n \n \n Among patients with severe AS, there was little impairment of MFV on TCD and no correlation with cognition. TAVR did not affect MFV or cognition. Assumptions about diminished CBF and improvement after TAVR were not supported.\n","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) results in higher systolic pressure to overcome resistance from the stenotic valve, leading to heart failure and decline in cardiac output. There has been no assessment of cerebral blood flow (CBF) association with neurocognition in AS, or the effects of valve replacement. The goal was to determine if AS is associated with altered cerebral hemodynamics and impaired neurocognition, and whether transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) improves hemodynamics and cognition. In 42 patients with planned TAVR, transcranial Doppler (TCD) assessed bilateral MCA mean flow velocity (MFV); abnormality was < 34.45 cm/sec. The neurocognitive battery assessed memory, language, attention, visual-spatial skills, and executive function, yielding a composite Z-score. Impairment was <1.5 SDs below the normative mean. The mean age was 78 years, 59%M, and the mean valve gradient was 46.87mm/Hg. Mean follow-up was 36 days post-TAVR (range 27 - 55). Pre-TAVR, the mean MFV was 42.36 cm/sec (SD=10.17), and the mean cognitive Z-score was -0.22 SD’s (range -1.99 to 1.08) below the normative mean. Among the 34 patients who returned after TAVR, the MFV was 41.59 cm/sec (SD=10.42), not different from baseline (p=0.66, 2.28-3.67). Post-TAVR average Zscores were 0.05 SDs above the normative mean, not meeting the pre-specified threshold for a clinically significant 0.5 SD change. Among patients with severe AS, there was little impairment of MFV on TCD and no correlation with cognition. TAVR did not affect MFV or cognition. Assumptions about diminished CBF and improvement after TAVR were not supported.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受 TAVR 治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的脑血流量和神经认知能力
主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)导致更高的收缩压以克服狭窄瓣膜的阻力,导致心力衰竭和心输出量下降。目前还没有评估脑血流量(CBF)与AS患者神经认知的关系,也没有评估瓣膜置换术的效果。目的是确定AS是否与脑血流动力学改变和神经认知受损有关,以及经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)是否改善血流动力学和认知。在42例计划TAVR患者中,经颅多普勒(TCD)评估双侧MCA平均血流速度(MFV);异常< 34.45 cm/sec。神经认知电池评估记忆、语言、注意力、视觉空间技能和执行功能,得出综合z分数。损伤值低于标准平均值<1.5 SDs。平均年龄78岁,59%M,平均瓣膜梯度46.87mm/Hg。平均随访时间为tavr后36天(范围27 - 55天)。tavr前,平均MFV为42.36 cm/sec (SD=10.17),平均认知Z-score比标准平均值低-0.22 SD(范围-1.99 ~ 1.08)。在34例TAVR术后返回的患者中,MFV为41.59 cm/sec (SD=10.42),与基线无差异(p=0.66, 2.28-3.67)。tavr后平均zscore比规范平均值高0.05个标准差,未达到预先设定的具有临床意义的0.5个标准差变化阈值。在严重AS患者中,MFV对TCD的损害很小,与认知无关。TAVR不影响MFV或认知。不支持TAVR后脑血流减少和改善的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The incidence of atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorders: a comparison between patients with and without embolic stroke of undetermined source. Intra-individual variability in lipoprotein(a): the value of a repeat measure for reclassifying individuals at intermediate risk. New data allow to better understand the secrets of lipoprotein(a): is that for sure? Correction to: Correlates and consequences of atrial fibrillation in a prospective study of 25 000 participants in the China Kadoorie Biobank. Colchicine for cardiovascular and limb risk reduction in Medicare beneficiaries with peripheral artery disease: emulation of target trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1