{"title":"Exploring ‘Future three’ curriculum scenarios in practice: Learning from the GeoCapabilities project","authors":"T. Béneker, G. Bladh, D. Lambert","doi":"10.1002/curj.240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper has its origins in the EU Comenius funded GeoCapabilities project. From its outset, the project developed and researched the notion of powerful disciplinary knowledge (PDK) as an underlying principle of curriculum making in the context of secondary school geography teaching. The work, led from the UCL Institute of Education and involving school teachers, teacher educators and other stakeholders across eight mainly European jurisdictions, was framed by Young and Muller's ‘three educational scenarios’ (Young & Muller, European Journal of Education, 45, 2010 and 11). The three futures heuristic is discussed as a means to distinguish qualities of curriculum thought. Future 3 scenarios, which posit teachers as curriculum makers with responsibility to engage in essential ‘knowledge work’, provide a principled platform on which to develop ambitious educational classroom encounters. Knowledge working with PDK and (as we go on to argue) other powerful ways of knowing the world, is seen as a bridge between social realist epistemological principles and practical classroom content selections. This opens the possibility of responding to Deng's (Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54, 2022) call for developing practical theories of content with teachers. Although the authors are geographers in education drawing on different international perspectives and traditions, the paper addresses matters of interest applicable to a variety of specialist subject domains across the secondary school curriculum.","PeriodicalId":93147,"journal":{"name":"The curriculum journal","volume":"27 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The curriculum journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper has its origins in the EU Comenius funded GeoCapabilities project. From its outset, the project developed and researched the notion of powerful disciplinary knowledge (PDK) as an underlying principle of curriculum making in the context of secondary school geography teaching. The work, led from the UCL Institute of Education and involving school teachers, teacher educators and other stakeholders across eight mainly European jurisdictions, was framed by Young and Muller's ‘three educational scenarios’ (Young & Muller, European Journal of Education, 45, 2010 and 11). The three futures heuristic is discussed as a means to distinguish qualities of curriculum thought. Future 3 scenarios, which posit teachers as curriculum makers with responsibility to engage in essential ‘knowledge work’, provide a principled platform on which to develop ambitious educational classroom encounters. Knowledge working with PDK and (as we go on to argue) other powerful ways of knowing the world, is seen as a bridge between social realist epistemological principles and practical classroom content selections. This opens the possibility of responding to Deng's (Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54, 2022) call for developing practical theories of content with teachers. Although the authors are geographers in education drawing on different international perspectives and traditions, the paper addresses matters of interest applicable to a variety of specialist subject domains across the secondary school curriculum.
本文起源于欧盟夸美纽斯资助的地理能力项目。从一开始,该项目就发展和研究了强大学科知识(PDK)的概念,将其作为中学地理教学背景下课程制定的基本原则。这项工作由伦敦大学学院教育研究所领导,涉及八个主要欧洲司法管辖区的学校教师,教师教育工作者和其他利益相关者,由Young和Muller的“三种教育情景”(Young和Muller,欧洲教育杂志,45,2010和11)构成。探讨了三种未来启发式作为区分课程思想品质的一种手段。未来三种情景,假设教师是课程制定者,有责任参与基本的“知识工作”,提供了一个原则性的平台,在这个平台上发展雄心勃勃的教育课堂相遇。与PDK一起工作的知识,以及(正如我们继续论证的)其他认识世界的有力方式,被视为社会现实主义认识论原则与实际课堂内容选择之间的桥梁。这开启了回应邓(Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54,2022)关于与教师一起发展内容实践理论的呼吁的可能性。虽然作者是教育领域的地理学家,借鉴了不同的国际视角和传统,但本文涉及的问题适用于中学课程中的各种专业学科领域。