The Nexus of farmers’ Sustainable agriculture potential and readiness for more organic use in rice farming: Insights from resilience theory

IF 2.3 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Environment Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1080/27658511.2023.2273619
S. M. W. P. K. Ariyarathna, Kgm Nanayakkara, S. C. Thushara
{"title":"The Nexus of farmers’ Sustainable agriculture potential and readiness for more organic use in rice farming: Insights from resilience theory","authors":"S. M. W. P. K. Ariyarathna, Kgm Nanayakkara, S. C. Thushara","doi":"10.1080/27658511.2023.2273619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sustainable Agriculture (SA) and the readiness of farmers to implement SA practices are broader discussions in global forums today. However, to date, there has been relatively little focus on holistically developed frameworks to assess farmers’ SA potential or their linkage to farmers’ readiness for SA practices such as adopting more organics in farming, particularly in Sri Lanka. To address this gap, we developed a conceptual model to determine farmers’ resilience in implementing more organic use in farming. The model developed was a philosophical combination of ecosystem resilience theory, the rural livelihood assessment framework, and the dimensions of personal readiness to commit to or experience an action. We derived composite indicators to explain the variances of these constructs through a detailed literature review, followed by pre-testing indicators. Data were collected from 386 participants using a structured questionnaire consisting of 119 items. Partial least squares structural equation modelling techniques were used to analyze the variables and path coefficients of the model. Farmers’ sustainable agricultural potential (SAP) was found to be moderately strong in this rice cultivation region. This potential positively influences their readiness for adapting more organics in farming. Some farmers perceived government support as effective. However, this support has not yet been transformed into organic adaptation. Natural capital was identified as the most influential factor in organic farming. Farmers’ education, gender, the extent of sowing, farming methods, and agro-input type were moderating factors between SAP and their readiness for organic matter. Farmers did not deny organic adaptation and understood the need to reduce the use of chemicals.","PeriodicalId":29858,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Environment","volume":"1 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2023.2273619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sustainable Agriculture (SA) and the readiness of farmers to implement SA practices are broader discussions in global forums today. However, to date, there has been relatively little focus on holistically developed frameworks to assess farmers’ SA potential or their linkage to farmers’ readiness for SA practices such as adopting more organics in farming, particularly in Sri Lanka. To address this gap, we developed a conceptual model to determine farmers’ resilience in implementing more organic use in farming. The model developed was a philosophical combination of ecosystem resilience theory, the rural livelihood assessment framework, and the dimensions of personal readiness to commit to or experience an action. We derived composite indicators to explain the variances of these constructs through a detailed literature review, followed by pre-testing indicators. Data were collected from 386 participants using a structured questionnaire consisting of 119 items. Partial least squares structural equation modelling techniques were used to analyze the variables and path coefficients of the model. Farmers’ sustainable agricultural potential (SAP) was found to be moderately strong in this rice cultivation region. This potential positively influences their readiness for adapting more organics in farming. Some farmers perceived government support as effective. However, this support has not yet been transformed into organic adaptation. Natural capital was identified as the most influential factor in organic farming. Farmers’ education, gender, the extent of sowing, farming methods, and agro-input type were moderating factors between SAP and their readiness for organic matter. Farmers did not deny organic adaptation and understood the need to reduce the use of chemicals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农民的可持续农业潜力与在水稻种植中更多使用有机物的准备程度之间的联系:复原力理论的启示
可持续农业(SA)和农民实施可持续农业实践的意愿是当今全球论坛上广泛讨论的话题。然而,迄今为止,相对较少关注整体开发框架,以评估农民的可持续发展潜力或其与农民对可持续发展实践的准备程度的联系,例如在农业中采用更多的有机产品,特别是在斯里兰卡。为了解决这一差距,我们开发了一个概念模型来确定农民在农业中实施更多有机使用的弹性。该模型是生态系统恢复力理论、农村生计评估框架和个人承诺或经历行动的准备程度的哲学结合。我们通过详细的文献回顾推导出复合指标来解释这些结构的差异,然后是预测试指标。从386名参与者中收集数据,使用包含119个项目的结构化问卷。采用偏最小二乘结构方程建模技术对模型的变量和路径系数进行了分析。该水稻种植区农民的可持续农业潜力(SAP)中等偏强。这种潜力积极影响了他们在农业中适应更多有机作物的意愿。一些农民认为政府的支持是有效的。然而,这种支持尚未转化为有机适应。自然资本是影响有机农业的主要因素。农民的教育程度、性别、播种程度、耕作方法和农业投入类型是SAP与他们对有机质的准备程度之间的调节因素。农民并不否认有机适应,也明白减少化学品使用的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Environment
Sustainable Environment ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Exploring loss and damage from climate change and global perspectives that influence response mechanism in vulnerable communities Exploring knowledge, attitudes and practices of farmers at the edge of Budongo forest on agrochemicals usage Pesticides in use, their application and risks on human health and ecosystems: A case of Fogera District, Ethiopia Hidden hazards in urban soils: A meta-analysis review of global heavy metal contamination (2010-2022), sources and its Ecological and health consequences Do innovation, financial development and institutional quality matter in managing carbon risk?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1