Is the mechanism of synchronous cardiocerebral infarction (CCI) different from that of metachronous CCI?

Q4 Nursing Journal of Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.18700/jnc.230029
Seonjeong Kim, Hyein Chung, Yoonkyung Lee, Byeol-A Yoon, D. Kim, Jin-Heon Jeong, Jae-Kwan Cha
{"title":"Is the mechanism of synchronous cardiocerebral infarction (CCI) different from that of metachronous CCI?","authors":"Seonjeong Kim, Hyein Chung, Yoonkyung Lee, Byeol-A Yoon, D. Kim, Jin-Heon Jeong, Jae-Kwan Cha","doi":"10.18700/jnc.230029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiocerebral infarction (CCI) is the simultaneous occurrence of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and myocardial infarction (MI) at the same time (synchronous), or one after another (metachronous). This study aimed to investigate the differences in the underlying mechanisms between synchronous and metachronous CCI. Methods: This study analyzed patients with AIS registered in the Clinical Research Collaboration for Stroke in Korea Prospective Registry at a single Stroke Center from January 2019 to December 2022. Patients with synchronous and metachronous CCI (MI within 72 hours after AIS) were included. Severity at admission and modified Rankin Scale scores 3 months after treatment were assessed. Results: Among 3,319 AIS patients, 12 (0.36%) were diagnosed with acute CCI (male, 8; mean age, 69.6±14.0 years). Of these, six (0.18%) had synchronous CCI, while the other six had metachronous CCI. The synchronous CCI group exhibited lower neurological severity at admission than the metachronous CCI group (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 3.5 vs. 12.5). Among the 12 patients, seven (58%) had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with five (83%) of the synchronous CCI cases presenting as STEMI. Two cases of new-onset atrial fibrillation occurred exclusively in patients with synchronous CCI. Also, one case with synchronous CCI had a thrombus in the left ventricle. Conclusion: Acute CCI is rare and manifests with varying degrees of severity. Our study suggests that AIS in synchronous CCI may be secondary to embolism caused by a preceding MI. In contrast, metachronous CCI exhibits diverse mechanisms, including secondary myocardial injury resulting from a preceding severe AIS.","PeriodicalId":33246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurocritical Care","volume":"58 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18700/jnc.230029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiocerebral infarction (CCI) is the simultaneous occurrence of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and myocardial infarction (MI) at the same time (synchronous), or one after another (metachronous). This study aimed to investigate the differences in the underlying mechanisms between synchronous and metachronous CCI. Methods: This study analyzed patients with AIS registered in the Clinical Research Collaboration for Stroke in Korea Prospective Registry at a single Stroke Center from January 2019 to December 2022. Patients with synchronous and metachronous CCI (MI within 72 hours after AIS) were included. Severity at admission and modified Rankin Scale scores 3 months after treatment were assessed. Results: Among 3,319 AIS patients, 12 (0.36%) were diagnosed with acute CCI (male, 8; mean age, 69.6±14.0 years). Of these, six (0.18%) had synchronous CCI, while the other six had metachronous CCI. The synchronous CCI group exhibited lower neurological severity at admission than the metachronous CCI group (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 3.5 vs. 12.5). Among the 12 patients, seven (58%) had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with five (83%) of the synchronous CCI cases presenting as STEMI. Two cases of new-onset atrial fibrillation occurred exclusively in patients with synchronous CCI. Also, one case with synchronous CCI had a thrombus in the left ventricle. Conclusion: Acute CCI is rare and manifests with varying degrees of severity. Our study suggests that AIS in synchronous CCI may be secondary to embolism caused by a preceding MI. In contrast, metachronous CCI exhibits diverse mechanisms, including secondary myocardial injury resulting from a preceding severe AIS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同步性心脑梗塞(CCI)的发病机制与非同步性心脑梗塞(CCI)的发病机制是否不同?
背景:心脑梗死(CCI)是急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)和心肌梗死(MI)同时发生(同步)或相继发生(异时性)。本研究旨在探讨同步型和异时型CCI在潜在机制上的差异。方法:本研究分析了2019年1月至2022年12月在单一卒中中心的韩国卒中临床研究合作前瞻性登记处登记的AIS患者。同时性和异时性CCI患者(AIS后72小时内的MI)被纳入研究。入院时的严重程度和治疗后3个月的改良Rankin量表评分进行评估。结果:3319例AIS患者中,12例(0.36%)被诊断为急性CCI(男性8例;平均年龄(69.6±14.0岁)。其中,6个(0.18%)具有同步CCI,而其他6个具有异时CCI。同步CCI组入院时的神经系统严重程度低于非同步CCI组(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表中位数,3.5比12.5)。在12例患者中,7例(58%)为st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),其中5例(83%)为同步CCI。2例新发心房颤动仅发生在同步CCI患者中。同时,1例同步CCI患者左心室有血栓。结论:急性CCI是罕见的,表现为不同程度的严重程度。我们的研究表明,同步CCI中的AIS可能继发于先前心肌梗死引起的栓塞。相反,非同步CCI表现出多种机制,包括先前严重AIS引起的继发性心肌损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurocritical Care
Journal of Neurocritical Care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accessory posterior cerebral artery (PCA): a rare variant of PCA Basilar artery hypoplasia with persistent fetal circulations misinterpreted as basilar artery occlusion in a non-invasive angiography A case report of pitfall of fever and altered mental status: cerebral malaria due to Plasmodium falciparum in an adult traveler returning from Congo Extremely elevated international normalized ratio in a patient using dabigatran etexilate: a case report Management strategies for refractory status epilepticus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1