Bryan J. Ranger, E. Bradburn, Qingchao Chen, Micah Kim, J. A. Noble, Aris T. Papageorghiou
{"title":"Portable ultrasound devices for obstetric care in resource-constrained environments: mapping the landscape","authors":"Bryan J. Ranger, E. Bradburn, Qingchao Chen, Micah Kim, J. A. Noble, Aris T. Papageorghiou","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.15088.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The WHO’s recommendations on antenatal care underscore the need for ultrasound assessment during pregnancy. Given that maternal and perinatal mortality remains unacceptably high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), these guidelines are imperative for achieving better outcomes. In recent years, portable ultrasound devices have become increasingly popular in LMICs due to their cost-effectiveness, useability, and adoptability in resource-constrained settings. This desk review presents the capabilities and costs of currently available portable ultrasound devices, and is meant to serve as a resource for clinicians and researchers in the imaging community. Methods A list of ideal technical features for portable ultrasound devices was developed in consultation with subject matter experts (SMEs). Features included image acquisition modes, cost, portability, compatibility, connectivity, data storage and security, and regulatory certification status. Information on each of the devices was collected from publicly available information, input from SMEs and/or discussions with company representatives. Results 14 devices were identified and included in this review. The output is meant to provide objective information on ideal technical features for available ultrasound systems to researchers and clinicians working in obstetric ultrasound in LMICs. No product endorsements are provided. Conclusions This desk review provides an overview of the landscape of low-cost portable ultrasound probes for use in obstetrics in LMICs, and provides a description of key capabilities and costs for each. Methods could be applied to mapping the landscape of portable ultrasound devices for other clinical applications, or may be extended to reviewing other types of healthcare technologies. Further studies are recommended to evaluate portable ultrasound devices for usability and durability in global field settings.","PeriodicalId":12593,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.15088.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background The WHO’s recommendations on antenatal care underscore the need for ultrasound assessment during pregnancy. Given that maternal and perinatal mortality remains unacceptably high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), these guidelines are imperative for achieving better outcomes. In recent years, portable ultrasound devices have become increasingly popular in LMICs due to their cost-effectiveness, useability, and adoptability in resource-constrained settings. This desk review presents the capabilities and costs of currently available portable ultrasound devices, and is meant to serve as a resource for clinicians and researchers in the imaging community. Methods A list of ideal technical features for portable ultrasound devices was developed in consultation with subject matter experts (SMEs). Features included image acquisition modes, cost, portability, compatibility, connectivity, data storage and security, and regulatory certification status. Information on each of the devices was collected from publicly available information, input from SMEs and/or discussions with company representatives. Results 14 devices were identified and included in this review. The output is meant to provide objective information on ideal technical features for available ultrasound systems to researchers and clinicians working in obstetric ultrasound in LMICs. No product endorsements are provided. Conclusions This desk review provides an overview of the landscape of low-cost portable ultrasound probes for use in obstetrics in LMICs, and provides a description of key capabilities and costs for each. Methods could be applied to mapping the landscape of portable ultrasound devices for other clinical applications, or may be extended to reviewing other types of healthcare technologies. Further studies are recommended to evaluate portable ultrasound devices for usability and durability in global field settings.