Effects of the Number of Classes and Pressure Map Resolution on Fine-Grained In-Bed Posture Classification

IF 1.9 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computation Pub Date : 2023-12-02 DOI:10.3390/computation11120239
Luís Fonseca, F. Ribeiro, J. Metrôlho
{"title":"Effects of the Number of Classes and Pressure Map Resolution on Fine-Grained In-Bed Posture Classification","authors":"Luís Fonseca, F. Ribeiro, J. Metrôlho","doi":"10.3390/computation11120239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In-bed posture classification has attracted considerable research interest and has significant potential to enhance healthcare applications. Recent works generally use approaches based on pressure maps, machine learning algorithms and focused mainly on finding solutions to obtain high accuracy in posture classification. Typically, these solutions use different datasets with varying numbers of sensors and classify the four main postures (supine, prone, left-facing, and right-facing) or, in some cases, include some variants of those main postures. Following this, this article has three main objectives: fine-grained detection of postures of bedridden people, identifying a large number of postures, including small variations—consideration of 28 different postures will help to better identify the actual position of the bedridden person with a higher accuracy. The number of different postures in this approach is considerably higher than the of those used in any other related work; analyze the impact of pressure map resolution on the posture classification accuracy, which has also not been addressed in other studies; and use the PoPu dataset, a dataset that includes pressure maps from 60 participants and 28 different postures. The dataset was analyzed using five distinct ML algorithms (k-nearest neighbors, linear support vector machines, decision tree, random forest, and multi-layer perceptron). This study’s findings show that the used algorithms achieve high accuracy in 4-posture classification (up to 99% in the case of MLP) using the PoPu dataset, with lower accuracies when attempting the finer-grained 28-posture classification approach (up to 68% in the case of random forest). The results indicate that using ML algorithms for finer-grained applications is possible to specify the patient’s exact position to some degree since the parent posture is still accurately classified. Furthermore, reducing the resolution of the pressure maps seems to affect the classifiers only slightly, which suggests that for applications that do not need finer-granularity, a lower resolution might suffice.","PeriodicalId":52148,"journal":{"name":"Computation","volume":"39 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/computation11120239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In-bed posture classification has attracted considerable research interest and has significant potential to enhance healthcare applications. Recent works generally use approaches based on pressure maps, machine learning algorithms and focused mainly on finding solutions to obtain high accuracy in posture classification. Typically, these solutions use different datasets with varying numbers of sensors and classify the four main postures (supine, prone, left-facing, and right-facing) or, in some cases, include some variants of those main postures. Following this, this article has three main objectives: fine-grained detection of postures of bedridden people, identifying a large number of postures, including small variations—consideration of 28 different postures will help to better identify the actual position of the bedridden person with a higher accuracy. The number of different postures in this approach is considerably higher than the of those used in any other related work; analyze the impact of pressure map resolution on the posture classification accuracy, which has also not been addressed in other studies; and use the PoPu dataset, a dataset that includes pressure maps from 60 participants and 28 different postures. The dataset was analyzed using five distinct ML algorithms (k-nearest neighbors, linear support vector machines, decision tree, random forest, and multi-layer perceptron). This study’s findings show that the used algorithms achieve high accuracy in 4-posture classification (up to 99% in the case of MLP) using the PoPu dataset, with lower accuracies when attempting the finer-grained 28-posture classification approach (up to 68% in the case of random forest). The results indicate that using ML algorithms for finer-grained applications is possible to specify the patient’s exact position to some degree since the parent posture is still accurately classified. Furthermore, reducing the resolution of the pressure maps seems to affect the classifiers only slightly, which suggests that for applications that do not need finer-granularity, a lower resolution might suffice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类别数量和压力图分辨率对精细床内姿势分类的影响
床上姿势分类已经引起了相当大的研究兴趣,并具有显著的潜力,以提高医疗保健应用。最近的工作一般使用基于压力图的方法,机器学习算法,主要集中在寻找解决方案,以获得较高的姿态分类精度。通常,这些解决方案使用具有不同数量传感器的不同数据集,并对四种主要姿势(仰卧、俯卧、朝左和朝右)进行分类,或者在某些情况下,包括这些主要姿势的一些变体。因此,本文主要有三个目标:对卧床者的姿势进行细粒度检测,识别大量的姿势,包括微小的变化——考虑28种不同的姿势,有助于更好地识别卧床者的实际位置,准确率更高。在这种方法中,不同姿势的数量远远高于任何其他相关工作中使用的姿势;分析压力图分辨率对姿态分类精度的影响,这也是其他研究尚未解决的问题;并使用PoPu数据集,该数据集包括60名参与者和28种不同姿势的压力图。数据集使用五种不同的机器学习算法(k近邻、线性支持向量机、决策树、随机森林和多层感知机)进行分析。本研究的结果表明,所使用的算法在使用PoPu数据集的4姿态分类中达到了很高的准确率(在MLP的情况下高达99%),而在尝试更细粒度的28姿态分类方法时准确率较低(在随机森林的情况下高达68%)。结果表明,由于父母的姿势仍然是准确分类的,因此在更细粒度的应用程序中使用ML算法可以在某种程度上指定患者的确切位置。此外,降低压力图的分辨率似乎对分类器的影响很小,这表明对于不需要更细粒度的应用程序,降低分辨率可能就足够了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computation
Computation Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
201
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Computation a journal of computational science and engineering. Topics: computational biology, including, but not limited to: bioinformatics mathematical modeling, simulation and prediction of nucleic acid (DNA/RNA) and protein sequences, structure and functions mathematical modeling of pathways and genetic interactions neuroscience computation including neural modeling, brain theory and neural networks computational chemistry, including, but not limited to: new theories and methodology including their applications in molecular dynamics computation of electronic structure density functional theory designing and characterization of materials with computation method computation in engineering, including, but not limited to: new theories, methodology and the application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) optimisation techniques and/or application of optimisation to multidisciplinary systems system identification and reduced order modelling of engineering systems parallel algorithms and high performance computing in engineering.
期刊最新文献
Analytical and Numerical Investigation of Two-Dimensional Heat Transfer with Periodic Boundary Conditions Enhancement of Machine-Learning-Based Flash Calculations near Criticality Using a Resampling Approach Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction Models: A Comparative Study for the Construction Sector in Greece Analysis of Effectiveness of Combined Surface Treatment Methods for Structural Parts with Holes to Enhance Their Fatigue Life A New Mixed Fractional Derivative with Applications in Computational Biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1