Performance Assessment of Pile Models Chemically Grouted by Low-Pressure Injection Laboratory Device for Improving Loose Sand

IF 1.7 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Pub Date : 2023-12-02 DOI:10.31026/j.eng.2023.12.08
Mohammed Saleh Mohammed, M. D. Ahmed
{"title":"Performance Assessment of Pile Models Chemically Grouted by Low-Pressure Injection Laboratory Device for Improving Loose Sand","authors":"Mohammed Saleh Mohammed, M. D. Ahmed","doi":"10.31026/j.eng.2023.12.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity and partially defined nature of jet grouting make it hard to predict the performance of grouted piles. So the trials of cement injection at a location with similar soil properties as the erecting site are necessary to assess the performance of the grouted piles. Nevertheless, instead of executing trial-injected piles at the pilot site, which wastes money, time, and effort, the laboratory cement injection devices are essential alternatives for evaluating soil injection ability. This study assesses the performance of a low-pressure laboratory grouting device by improving loose sandy soil injected using binders formed of Silica Fume (SF) as a chemical admixture (10% of Ordinary Portland Cement OPC mass) to different (W/C) water/cement ratios (by mass materials) mixes. Trial grouting processes were executed to optimize the practical ranges of the operating factors of the laboratory device to obtain consistent grouted model pile samples. The paper examined the relations of the binders' W/C ratios with the densities, elasticity modulus (E), and Uniaxial Compression Stress (UCS) of the grouted piles. The investigation results show that as the binder W/C ratio rises, the grouted pile samples' dry density, E, and UCS values decrease. For the binder injected with a W/C ratio of one and 10% SF additive by weight of cement mass, the highest values of the grouted pile for density, E, and UCS were about 2.32 g/cm3, 23 MPa, and 2000 MPa, respectively. The UCS of the grouted pile proved that the binders' W/C ratios and the SF addition have an evident effect on the investigated factors of the grouted piles.\n ","PeriodicalId":15716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2023.12.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complexity and partially defined nature of jet grouting make it hard to predict the performance of grouted piles. So the trials of cement injection at a location with similar soil properties as the erecting site are necessary to assess the performance of the grouted piles. Nevertheless, instead of executing trial-injected piles at the pilot site, which wastes money, time, and effort, the laboratory cement injection devices are essential alternatives for evaluating soil injection ability. This study assesses the performance of a low-pressure laboratory grouting device by improving loose sandy soil injected using binders formed of Silica Fume (SF) as a chemical admixture (10% of Ordinary Portland Cement OPC mass) to different (W/C) water/cement ratios (by mass materials) mixes. Trial grouting processes were executed to optimize the practical ranges of the operating factors of the laboratory device to obtain consistent grouted model pile samples. The paper examined the relations of the binders' W/C ratios with the densities, elasticity modulus (E), and Uniaxial Compression Stress (UCS) of the grouted piles. The investigation results show that as the binder W/C ratio rises, the grouted pile samples' dry density, E, and UCS values decrease. For the binder injected with a W/C ratio of one and 10% SF additive by weight of cement mass, the highest values of the grouted pile for density, E, and UCS were about 2.32 g/cm3, 23 MPa, and 2000 MPa, respectively. The UCS of the grouted pile proved that the binders' W/C ratios and the SF addition have an evident effect on the investigated factors of the grouted piles.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过低压喷射实验室装置进行化学灌浆以改善松散砂质的桩模型性能评估
射流注浆的复杂性和不完全定性给注浆桩的性能预测带来了困难。因此,有必要在与桩身土体性质相近的位置进行注浆试验,以评估注浆桩的性能。然而,与其在试验点进行试验注入桩,浪费金钱、时间和精力,实验室水泥注入装置是评估土壤注入能力的重要替代方案。本研究通过使用硅粉(SF)作为化学混合物(普通波特兰水泥OPC质量的10%)形成的粘合剂与不同(W/C)水/水泥比(按质量材料)混合物注入松散的沙土,来评估低压实验室注浆装置的性能。通过试验注浆工艺,优化实验装置操作因素的适用范围,以获得一致的注浆模型桩样。研究了粘结剂的W/C比与注浆桩密度、弹性模量(E)和单轴压应力(UCS)的关系。研究结果表明,随着粘结剂W/C比的增大,灌注桩样的干密度、E、UCS值均减小;当胶结剂注入水泥质量W/C比为1和10%的SF时,注浆桩的密度、E和UCS的最大值分别约为2.32 g/cm3、23 MPa和2000 MPa。注浆桩的单轴受力分析表明,粘结剂的W/C比和SF的加入量对注浆桩的各因素有明显的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering
Journal of Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in several areas of engineering. The subject areas covered by the journal are: - Chemical Engineering - Civil Engineering - Computer Engineering - Electrical Engineering - Industrial Engineering - Mechanical Engineering
期刊最新文献
Study on the Safety Thickness of Three Zones against Fault Water Inrush: Case Study and Model Development Design and Maintenance Optimisation of Substation Automation Systems: A Multiobjectivisation Approach Exploration Effect of Source Type on Pore Structure and Properties of Aerated Geopolymer Concrete Improving Press Bending Production Quality through Finite Element Simulation: Integration CAD and CAE Approach Assessment of Traditional Asphalt Mixture Performance Using Natural Asphalt from Sulfur Springs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1